KTT Strawberry vs. Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile
An in-depth look at the KTT Strawberry and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Strawberry and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile stand out as popular choices among enthusiasts. The KTT Strawberry is a linear switch known for its smooth actuation, comfortable feel, and reliable performance. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switches by Wuque Studio offer a tactile bump along with a neutral sound signature, providing a different typing experience. While the Strawberry is lauded for its low-pitched, frictionless, and buttery feel, the WS Light Tactile is appreciated for its stepped, easy-to-press nature. Each switch has its own unique characteristics that may appeal to different users based on their preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
62g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated
Spring
15.4mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
Both the KTT Strawberry and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the material's stiffness. This makes them ideal for switches with RGB lighting, as the translucency of polycarbonate allows light to shine through. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile stands out with its nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound compared to the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Strawberry.
While the top housings of both the KTT Strawberry and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile are made of polycarbonate, their bottom housings differ, showcasing the unique characteristics of each material. The stiffer polycarbonate used in the bottom housing of the Strawberry contributes to a clearer and resonant sound profile, which can be felt more prominently during the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch. In contrast, the nylon bottom housing of the WS Light Tactile offers a softer and more muted sound, creating a different typing experience with a deeper sound profile. The choice of bottom housing material can significantly impact the overall sound and feel of the switch.
Ultimately, the housing materials of the KTT Strawberry and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile play a crucial role in shaping the sound and feel of the switches. While both switches feature polycarbonate top housings for a sharp and clear sound profile, their differences lie in the bottom housings. The KTT Strawberry's polycarbonate bottom housing provides a more resonant typing experience, while the WS Light Tactile's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound. Understanding how each material influences the overall sound and feel of the switches can help users make informed decisions based on their preferences for typing experience.
Weight
The actuation force of the KTT Strawberry linear switch is 43 grams, while the actuation force of the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch is 45 grams. The bottom out force of the Strawberry is 62 grams, and the bottom out force of the WS Light Tactile is 50 grams. This makes the Strawberry switch heavier in both actuation and bottom out force compared to the WS Light Tactile switch. The lighter actuation and bottom out force of the WS Light Tactile switch make it ideal for those who prefer a lighter typing experience, suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions. On the other hand, the heavier actuation and bottom out force of the KTT Strawberry switch provide a more substantial typing experience for users who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Strawberry linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, we find that both switches have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when pressing down on either key, the distance traveled by the switch will be identical, resulting in a similar tactile experience for the user. Therefore, in terms of travel distance, both the KTT Strawberry and the WS Light Tactile switches offer the same level of key press feedback.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT Strawberry comes in at $4.91, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile comes in at $4.20.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Strawberry offers a low-pitched tone that gives a bass-heavy and mellow sound, providing a soothing typing experience. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile features a neutral sound signature, which is moderate and suitable for various uses without being too overwhelming or too quiet. Both switches excel in different aspects of sound, but ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on personal preference and the overall set up of the keyboard.
Moving on to feel, the KTT Strawberry is praised for its frictionless, silky, buttery, and polished properties, providing an exceptionally smooth and seamless typing experience. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile offers a stepped feel, making it feel like the keystroke has two distinct stages, along with being easy-to-press for minimal resistance. While the Strawberry focuses on providing a luxurious and effortless typing feel, the WS Light Tactile aims to offer a tactile experience with a bit of resistance for precision typing. Again, the choice between the two would depend on the individual's preference for typing feel.
In conclusion, both the KTT Strawberry linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Strawberry provides a low-pitched sound with a smooth typing experience, while the WS Light Tactile offers a neutral sound signature and a stepped tactile feel. Ultimately, whether one prefers a mellow typing experience or a more tactile and responsive feel, both switches deliver quality performance in their respective categories. Depending on personal preferences and typing needs, users can expect a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience with either of these switches.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Strawberry linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, consider your preferences and needs. If you prioritize a medium bottom out force with a smooth actuation and comfortable feel, the Strawberry switch may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force with a snappy tactile bump and a neutral sound signature, the WS Light Tactile switch could be more suited to your typing style. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you value smoothness and reliability or a distinct tactile feedback and lighter keypresses. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing preferences to enhance your overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
