HMX SU vs. Jwick Taro
An in-depth look at the HMX SU and the Jwick Taro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the choice between the HMX SU and the Jwick Taro involves weighing the benefits of a linear switch against those of a tactile option. The HMX SU is ideal for users who appreciate a smooth, uninterrupted keystroke, making it perfect for fast typists or gamers seeking swiftness and precision. Its full PA12 housing combined with a T5 stem creates a subtle yet rich sound profile, enhancing the overall typing experience. In contrast, the Jwick Taro switches offer a delightful tactile feel, providing a snappy feedback with each keystroke. Users who prefer a more engaging typing experience may find the medium-level tactility and crisp clacks of the Taro switches particularly satisfying, providing a cozy and inviting atmosphere. While both switches cater to different preferences, they each hold unique allure for keyboard enthusiasts. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX SU and the Jwick Taro, a notable difference lies in the top housing. The SU features a nylon top housing, which is revered for its ability to create a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softness of nylon absorbs sound waves effectively, leading to a rounder sound when typing. Conversely, the Taro has a polycarbonate top housing, known for producing a sharper and crisper acoustic response. The rigidity of polycarbonate enhances the clarity of sound, resulting in a higher-pitched noise upon keystroke. This fundamental difference in acoustic properties reflects the distinct experiences that users may have while typing, with nylon offering a warmer tone while polycarbonate caters to those who prefer a clearer and more vibrant sound.
In contrast, both the HMX SU and Jwick Taro utilize nylon for their bottom housing. This consistency in material results in a similar auditory experience, given that nylon's softer characteristics play a significant role in creating a deeper and more resonant sound profile. As the bottom housing is more influential in the bottom-out sound and feel, both switches provide a unified typing experience with that expected fullness and depth. This shared nylon material makes both switches appealing for users who appreciate a more muted and rounded sound when bottoming out, emphasizing the compatibility of sound characteristics even amidst their differing top housing materials.
Ultimately, the interaction of materials in the SU and Taro results in a distinctive yet complementary sound profile. The nylon bottom housing in both switches assures that users will experience a consistent depth in sound, while the varying top housings—nylon in the SU and polycarbonate in the Taro—will differentiate the overall typing experience and sound quality. Thus, while users of the SU may find comfort in the warmth of nylon, those favoring the Taro can enjoy a clearer, brighter sound without compromising the fundamental auditory experience provided by the nylon bottom housing. Overall, this interplay of materials highlights how both switches can cater to diverse preferences while still providing exceptional performance.
Weight
When comparing the HMX SU linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch based on their actuation and bottom-out forces, there are notable differences. The HMX SU features a relatively light actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom-out force of 50 grams, making it a suitable choice for those who prioritize typing comfort over extended periods, such as during work or long gaming sessions. In contrast, the Jwick Taro does not have a specified actuation force, but it carries a significantly heavier bottom-out force of 67 grams. This indicates that while the force required to register a keystroke for the Taro is unknown, it likely provides a more substantial typing experience which some users may prefer. Overall, the HMX SU is the lighter option, catering to users who favor a gentler touch, while the Jwick Taro is heavier, appealing to those who enjoy a firmer push.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX SU linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, the SU measures 3.6 mm, while the Taro comes in at 3.7 mm. This makes the SU the shorter option, providing a more responsive feel, which can be advantageous for gamers or those who prefer quicker key actuations. In contrast, the Taro’s travel distance, being slightly longer, may offer a more substantial depth that some users appreciate for its tactile feedback and a less abrupt feel. Both switches fall within the range of contemporary designs, with travel distances that are notably shorter than the traditional 4.0 mm, catering to varied preferences in key feel and response. Thus, the subtle difference in travel distance can influence the user experience, depending on whether one values speed or a fuller key press sensation.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX SU has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the SU for $3.29.
The Jwick Taro has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taro for $4.25.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX SU linear switch is known for its subtle, deep sound profile, which tends to create a more muted and understated acoustic experience while typing. This characteristic may appeal to users looking for a quieter keyboard that doesn't disturb others in the same space. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro tactile switch offers a sound profile that is sharper and crisper, producing acute clacks that can bring a satisfying auditory feedback to each keystroke. The neutral nature of the Taro's sound makes it versatile for both home and office settings, appealing to those who prefer a sound that is neither too loud nor too soft. Ultimately, while both switches can provide a distinct typing experience, the SU leans towards a deep resonance, whereas the Taro delivers bright and percussive sounds.
When it comes to feel, users of the SU switch can expect a smooth and linear keystroke experience, which is typical for linear switches and allows for seamless typing without any tactile interruption. This promotes a fluid typing experience that many users find effortless. Conversely, the Taro switch features a combination of buttery smoothness with a stepped tactile sensation. The snappy, medium-level tactility offers a pronounced bump at actuation, providing users with physical feedback that enhances the typing experience. This two-stage feel can help typists know when their keystroke has registered without needing to bottom out the key, catering particularly well to touch typists who appreciate tactile feedback.
In conclusion, while both the HMX SU linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch have their unique characteristics, they cater to different preferences in sound and feel. The SU emphasizes a deeper, quieter sound with a fluid typing experience, making it ideal for those who prefer a more subdued approach. In contrast, the Taro engages users with a crisp sound and a tactile response that enhances typing feedback. Depending on individual typing style and sound preferences, users can choose either switch to achieve a satisfying and enjoyable mechanical keyboard experience, knowing that both offer distinct qualities that can suit various needs.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the HMX SU linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you favor a lightweight keystroke with a subtle yet deep sound profile, the HMX SU switch is an excellent choice, making it particularly well-suited for environments where noise control is important, such as in an office setting or when you are sharing your space with others. Its smooth and uninterrupted feel can enhance your typing experience, especially if you prioritize speed over tactile feedback. On the other hand, if you enjoy a bit more resistance and tactile sensation while typing, the Jwick Taro switch would be the better option. With its medium-heavy actuation force and snappy, buttery feel, you can expect crisp, satisfying clacks that resonate with each keystroke, which can be very gratifying for typing enthusiasts. Furthermore, the Taro's stepped tactility provides a unique experience as it blends a tactile bump with a smooth transition, making it ideal for those who enjoy feedback while typing without overwhelming resistance. In summary, consider your typing style, comfort, and environment when choosing between these two switches to ensure the best fit for your mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
