United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Bsun Tomcat vs. Wuque Studio WS POM+

An in-depth look at the Bsun Tomcat and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switches can significantly influence your typing experience, and two intriguing contenders are the Bsun Tomcat and the Wuque Studio WS POM+. Both linear switches offer distinct advantages for typists and gamers alike. The Tomcat is celebrated for its Ly stems, which provide an exceptionally smooth typing experience, complemented by a resonant sound profile that enhances its appeal. On the other hand, the WS POM+ boasts an all-POM construction, delivering a deep, satisfying "thock" sound signature and a buttery-smooth keystroke that many users find irresistible. Each switch has its own unique charm, making it crucial to weigh their characteristics based on personal preference and usage. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

54g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

1.95 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

Ly

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Extended spring

Spring

22mm extended double-stage spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Bsun Tomcat and the Wuque Studio WS POM+, it's evident that both switches utilize a combination of different plastics, resulting in distinct sound profiles and tactile experiences. The Tomcat features a polycarbonate top housing that creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, benefitting from polycarbonate's stiffness and translucency, which enhances RGB lighting effects. In contrast, the WS POM+ utilizes a POM (polyoxymethylene) top housing, which is known for generating a lower, more muted sound. This different sound characteristic stems from POM's unique properties, which evoke a distinct auditory experience, catering to users who prefer a deeper tone. The varying acoustics produced by these materials signify that users seeking specific sound profiles may have distinct preferences between the two switches.

In terms of the bottom housing, the differences continue to become more pronounced. The Tomcat utilizes a nylon bottom housing which, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound to create a fuller and deeper sound profile. This contributes to a softer bottom-out feel and a rounder auditory experience when keys are pressed. Meanwhile, the WS POM+ features a POM bottom housing, similarly noted for its ability to deliver a deep and muted sound. While both switches enjoy a pleasant sound from their bottom housings, the textile results of the Tomcat's nylon compared to the WS POM+'s POM introduce nuances in how these switches perform when pressed down upon. Users may find that while both switches offer deep sound profiles, the textures and resonance can differ significantly.

Ultimately, the combination of the top and bottom housing materials in both the Bsun Tomcat and Wuque Studio WS POM+ highlights how each switch's design choices lead to unique auditory experiences. For users who may prioritize a specific sound profile, the polycarbonate housing of the Tomcat may offer a sharper high end with a resonance that complements RGB lighting, while the complete POM housing of the WS POM+ provides a more muted and deep auditory experience. However, by acknowledging that both sets of materials can interact variably, it becomes clear that users can achieve similar pleasing results depending on their preferences for sound clarity and depth. In practice, one may favor the intricate nuances of the Tomcat's polycarbonate and nylon combination or the robust and muted character of the WS POM+'s completely POM construction, ultimately shaping the typing experience based on individual taste.

Weight

The Bsun Tomcat linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch exhibit similar actuation forces, both requiring 45 grams to trigger a keystroke; this means users will have an equally light typing experience with both switches, making them suitable for long typing sessions and extended gaming without significant fatigue. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, the Tomcat switch has a slightly lower force of 54 grams compared to the 55 grams of the WS POM+. This difference suggests that while both switches are in the medium-light range, the Tomcat provides a marginally softer experience at the bottom of the key press. Ultimately, the Tomcat can be considered the lighter option overall, while the WS POM+ is the heavier of the two, appealing to those who prefer a more substantial feel in their keystrokes.

Travel distance

Both the Bsun Tomcat linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch feature an identical travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that users will experience the same key travel when pressing down on either switch, resulting in similar tactile feedback and actuation feel during use. Consequently, either switch would be suitable for those who prefer a consistent and uniform key travel experience in their typing or gaming activities. Since both switches have the same travel distance, they are equally likely to deliver a comparable performance overall.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the Bsun Tomcat comes in at $2.99, whereas the Wuque Studio WS POM+ comes in at $3.90.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch features a resonant sound profile that can create a pleasing acoustics experience while typing. Although specific sound descriptors are not provided, we can infer that its construction likely leans towards a clean, smooth delivery without the harshness found in tactile or clicky switches. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS POM+ offers a distinctive deep and satisfying "thock" sound, characterized as low-pitched and somewhat subdued. This gives it a rich auditory signature that many enthusiasts find appealing, especially those who enjoy deeper, bass-heavy tones. While the Tomcat may produce a more neutral sound profile, both switches contribute to a more subdued typing experience compared to higher-pitched variants.

When it comes to feel, the Tomcat switch is noted for its use of Ly stems, which typically provide a super smooth typing experience. While the specifics aren’t detailed, this characteristic suggests a focus on fluidity with minimal friction. The WS POM+, on the other hand, is described using terms such as buttery and silky, indicating an exceptionally smooth keystroke experience. This implies not only effortless key presses but also a heightened sense of uniformity throughout the typing journey. Both switches prioritize a smooth and seamless feel, ensuring that typists experience comfort and efficiency regardless of the specific switch chosen.

Considering the overall attributes, both the Bsun Tomcat and Wuque Studio WS POM+ switches are designed to deliver high-quality typing experiences, with tactile smoothness being a key focus. The Tomcat leans towards a resonant and neutral sound profile, while the WS POM+ excels in offering a rich, thocky sound that many users adore. In terms of feel, the Tomcat's super smooth experience complements the buttery and silky sensations of the WS POM+, making both excellent choices for those seeking a linear switch. Ultimately, your choice may come down to personal sound preference; if you appreciate a deeper auditory experience, the WS POM+ might be ideal, while those who prefer a more straightforward, clean sound may gravitate towards the Tomcat.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the Bsun Tomcat linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, it's essential to consider your typing preferences and sound experience. If you prioritize a super smooth typing experience with an overall resonant sound profile, the Tomcat might be your ideal choice. Its medium-light actuation force provides a comfortable typing environment, ideal for those who spend long hours at the keyboard, while its unique design features help reduce any friction during keystrokes. On the other hand, the WS POM+ excels in delivering a deep, satisfying "thock" sound and an incredibly smooth keystroke. If you enjoy a richer auditory feedback during your typing sessions and appreciate a buttery and silky feel, this switch will likely enhance your typing experience. Ultimately, your choice should reflect whether you favor the subtle smoothness of the Tomcat or the thocky satisfaction offered by the WS POM+. Consider your typing style, sound preferences, and overall aesthetic when making your final decision.

Mentioned in this article