United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

TTC Venus vs. KTT Wine Red

An in-depth look at the TTC Venus and the KTT Wine Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

The TTC Venus and KTT Wine Red are both linear mechanical keyboard switches, but they offer distinct features that cater to different preferences. The Venus is praised for its unique internal configuration, providing a smooth and captivating typing experience with a matte sensation and muted sound signature. On the other hand, the Wine Red is beloved for its pillowy light feel and deep, rich sound profile. While the Venus offers a buttery and gummy typing feel, the Wine Red provides a bassy and low-pitched sound. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

44g

Bottom-out force

52g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Lengthened 20.5mm spring

Spring

Progressive spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the TTC Venus and the KTT Wine Red both utilize polycarbonate in their top and bottom housings, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a relatively stiffer plastic, which leads to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate allows for RGB lighting to shine through, enhancing the aesthetics of the switches. Despite both switches using polycarbonate in their housing materials, the sound profile may vary slightly due to other factors such as the design and construction of the switches.

While the TTC Venus features a POM top housing, which creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, the KTT Wine Red utilizes a polycarbonate top housing for a sharper and higher-pitched sound. This difference in material results in a distinct sound profile between the two switches. However, both switches share the use of polycarbonate in their bottom housings, emphasizing the consistent and crisp sound quality that this material provides. The choice between a POM top housing and a polycarbonate top housing ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound and feel.

Overall, the housing materials of the TTC Venus and the KTT Wine Red play a crucial role in shaping the sound profile and overall performance of the switches. The use of polycarbonate in both switches ensures a clear and resonant sound, with the top housing influencing the sound upon key release and the bottom housing impacting the bottom-out sound and feel. While the Venus offers a POM top housing for a deeper sound, the Wine Red's polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper tone. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound and aesthetics.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the TTC Venus linear switch and the KTT Wine Red linear switch, we can see that the Venus has a slightly lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Wine Red's 44 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Venus is 52 grams, while the Wine Red has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 55 grams. Both switches fall under the category of medium-light when it comes to force requirements. The Venus provides a lighter typing experience overall, which may be preferred for longer typing sessions or gaming, while the Wine Red offers a slightly stronger push feel for those seeking a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The TTC Venus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the KTT Wine Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Wine Red has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Venus. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, with the Venus being even shorter than the more common 4.0mm distance. Gamers looking for faster response times may prefer the Venus with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial feel when pressing down on a key may lean towards the Wine Red. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the feel of the switch during use.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The TTC Venus has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Venus for $5.09.

The KTT Wine Red comes in at $2.71 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the TTC Venus linear switch is characterized by a low-pitched, muted, neutral, subdued, and thocky sound profile. This means that it produces a softer and bass-heavy sound signature that is more mellow and dampened compared to other switches, with a satisfyingly deep and rich tone when pressed. On the other hand, the KTT Wine Red linear switch is described as bassy and low-pitched, offering a deeper and richer sound profile during key presses, similar to the depth and richness associated with bass tones. Ultimately, both switches provide a unique auditory experience that can be further influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.

When it comes to feel, the TTC Venus linear switch is known for its buttery, gummy, frictionless, mild, and polished typing experience. This means that it offers a smooth, seamless, and effortless keystroke with minimal resistance or friction, providing a fluid and polished typing sensation that is approachable to most users. On the other hand, information on the feel of the KTT Wine Red linear switch is not provided. However, based on the characteristics of the switches, it can be inferred that the Wine Red switch may offer a pillowy light type feel that is satisfying and comfortable for typing.

Overall, the TTC Venus linear switch stands out for its unique matte sensation, light actuation, and muted sound signature that creates a smooth and engaging typing experience. In contrast, the KTT Wine Red linear switch is praised for its deep and rich sound profile that complements a satisfyingly light type feel. Both switches offer their own set of subjective qualities that cater to different preferences, and choosing between them would ultimately depend on the user's personal typing preferences and priorities.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the TTC Venus linear switch and the KTT Wine Red linear switch, consider the unique features of each. If you prioritize a seamless, nearly frictionless glide coupled with a "Q-texture" sensation reminiscent of chewy mochi, along with a light actuation for rapid typing and a muted sound signature, then the TTC Venus may be the switch for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a pillowy light typing feel, a satisfyingly deep and rich sound profile, and a slightly higher bottom out force, the KTT Wine Red switch could be the better choice. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for typing feel, sound profile, and bottom out force.

Mentioned in this article