United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX 1989 vs. Sarokeys BCP

An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the Sarokeys BCP switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When exploring the world of mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and Sarokeys BCP present two appealing yet distinct options for enthusiasts seeking a linear experience. The HMX 1989, part of the HMX Film switch series, is celebrated for its deep, thocky sound, making it an excellent choice for gamers and typists who prioritize a satisfying acoustic feedback alongside a smooth actuation. In contrast, the Sarokeys BCP, inspired by the iconic Black Cherry Pies, offers a unique, creamy typing feel characterized by its bouncy and elastic nature, which many users find delightful for both gaming and prolonged typing sessions. While the BCPs deliver a signature poppy and clacky sound, reminiscent of their storied predecessors, the 1989 focuses more on a subdued thock that appeals to those who prefer a less invasive auditory experience. Ultimately, both switches have their advocates, each suited to different preferences in feel and sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the ideal switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

51g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

57g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.30 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

T5

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

Single-staged 20mm lengthened spring

Housing materials

The HMX 1989 and the Sarokeys BCP feature distinct top housing materials that result in contrasting auditory experiences when typing. The HMX 1989 utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its crisp and sharp sound profile. This is primarily due to polycarbonate's rigidity, which enables a clearer and more resonant sound when a key is pressed. Furthermore, polycarbonate's translucent nature pairs exceptionally well with RGB lighting, creating a visually striking effect that enhances the overall aesthetic of the keyboard. In contrast, the Sarokeys BCP employs a nylon top housing, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon's softer composition absorbs more sound energy than polycarbonate, resulting in a more subdued auditory experience that favors a rounder and duller tone. This fundamental difference in material choice affects the acoustic characteristics of the switches, leading to distinct user experiences.

On the bottom housing front, both keyboards utilize nylon material, which serves to reinforce the sound profiles generated by each keyboard. The nylon bottom housing, present in both the HMX 1989 and the Sarokeys BCP, produces a similar deeper and fuller sound due to its sound-absorbing properties. This unanimity in bottom housing material means that while the top housings create varied soundscapes, the foundational auditory qualities that come from the bottom housing remain consistent. When a key is pressed down, the nylon of the bottom housing plays a crucial role in how the sound is felt due to its ability to dampen and modify sound waves. As a result, both switches can provide a satisfying bottom-out feeling that resonates with users, even if the overall experience differs based on the top material.

In terms of user experience, the combination of differing top housings and identical bottom housings creates a unique synergy in both keyboards. While the HMX 1989’s polycarbonate top delivers a lively and vibrant auditory response during key releases, the Sarokeys BCP’s nylon top housing envelops the user in a warmer sound environment. The bottom housings ensure that both keyboards retain a compatibility in depth and fullness of sound, regardless of how the top materials perform. Ultimately, the choice between these keyboards may come down to personal preference regarding the desired auditory feedback and tactile sensation while typing, illustrating how housing materials fundamentally shape the mechanical keyboard experience.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Sarokeys BCP linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 switch has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Sarokeys BCP switch features a heavier actuation force of 51 grams and a bottom out force of 57 grams. This indicates that the BCP requires slightly more effort to actuate and bottom out compared to the HMX 1989, resulting in a more substantial feel during typing. For those who favor lighter switches for extended use, the HMX 1989 may be the better choice, as it allows for easier typing over long periods, making it ideal for work or gaming. Conversely, users who prefer a stronger, more tactile experience may lean towards the BCP, benefiting from its heavier resistance. Ultimately, these differences in actuation force and bottom out force will greatly influence the typing experience, catering to individual preferences.

Travel distance

The HMX 1989 linear switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Sarokeys BCP linear switch has a shorter travel distance of 3.2 mm. This significant difference indicates that the HMX 1989 provides a deeper, more traditional feel when pressed, which can appeal to users who appreciate tactile feedback and a more pronounced keystroke depth. In contrast, the BCP’s shorter travel distance aligns with the growing trend towards quicker response times favored by gamers, who often prefer a snappier feel for rapid key presses. Ultimately, those who seek a more responsive experience may gravitate towards the BCP switch, while users desiring a more substantial keystroke may find the longer travel distance of the HMX 1989 to be preferable.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.

The Sarokeys BCP has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the BCP for $4.85.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When considering the sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch, it is essential to note that additional details regarding its auditory characteristics are not provided. However, in contrast, the Sarokeys BCP linear switch is noted for its distinctively clacky sound. This clackiness offers a sharp and snappy auditory sensation with crisp, bright, and percussive notes resonating with each keystroke. While the 1989’s sound qualities are unknown, it is worth keeping in mind that the overall sound experience is influenced by factors such as the keyboard's construction and the choice of keycaps. Where one switch might excel in sound dampening or resonance, the other may not, leading to different auditory experiences in practical use.

In terms of tactile feedback, the HMX 1989 lacks specific descriptors for its feel, leaving a gap in direct comparison. The Sarokeys BCP switch, however, is characterized by a bouncy and creamy sensation. Featuring a bounce-back effect akin to a spring, the BCPs provide an enjoyable and lively experience upon keystrokes. The creamy aspect grants a smooth, almost buttery typing experience that enhances the overall feel for users who value fluidity in their keystrokes. Given that no descriptions are available for the HMX 1989, it remains uncertain whether its tactile feedback could match or differ significantly from the appealing characteristics of the BCPs.

In conclusion, while the HMX 1989 linear switch lacks explicit sound and feel descriptors, the Sarokeys BCP linear switch showcases a unique clacky auditory profile accompanied by a delightful bouncy and creamy tactile sensation. If you prefer a thocky auditory experience similar to the BCP’s signature sound, you might achieve it by experimenting with the right board and keycaps with the HMX 1989, although the exact experience may differ. Ultimately, the BCPs offer a well-defined experience, making them an appealing choice for newcomers drawn to engaging auditory and tactile keyboard interactions.

Conclusion

To sum up, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Sarokeys BCP linear switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences regarding sound and feel during typing or gaming sessions. If you seek a switch that delivers a deeper and "thocky" sound profile, coupled with a medium-light feel at 53 grams of bottom out force, the HMX 1989 is your go-to option. It’s particularly well-suited for those who appreciate a satisfying auditory feedback that complements their keystrokes. Conversely, if you favor a lively, bouncy response with a distinctive clacky sound, the Sarokeys BCP switch is the way to go. With its 57 grams bottom out force, it not only provides an elastic, spring-like feel but also offers a creamy typing experience, making it enjoyable for both casual typing and gaming enthusiasts. Additionally, if you appreciate the aesthetics of sound in your typing experience, the BCP's sharp and snappy auditory feedback will enhance that connection. Ultimately, your decision will reflect your typing needs and the atmosphere you wish to create, ensuring that your keyboard setup is perfectly tailored to your liking.

Mentioned in this article