HMX 1989 vs. HMX Canglan V2
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the HMX Canglan V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts often seek the perfect blend of sound, feel, and tactile experience. Two noteworthy contenders from the HMX lineup are the HMX 1989 and the HMX Canglan V2, both linear switches that promise unique experiences. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep thocky sound profile, making it an attractive choice for gamers who value auditory feedback during intense gameplay. On the other hand, the HMX Canglan V2 is crafted for those who crave a smooth typing experience combined with a lightweight feel, all while delivering a satisfying acoustic presence. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the 1989 focusing on a robust and resonant feedback, while the Canglan V2 shines with its refined materials and construction that enhance its overall performance. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
48g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
T2
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX Canglan V2, significant differences emerge, particularly with the top housings. The HMX 1989 utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. This is attributed to polycarbonate's stiffness, which enhances sound clarity and resonance. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it an advantageous choice for RGB lighting, allowing light to pass through and illuminate the switch’s interior in an appealing manner. In contrast, the Canglan V2 features a nylon top housing that generates a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon's characteristic softness allows it to absorb some sound waves, resulting in a rounder sound that contrasts with the 1989’s crisper output. Thus, while both switches will produce compelling sound profiles, the HMX 1989 will lean towards brighter tones, while the Canglan V2 will offer a more subdued auditory experience.
Examining the bottom housings of both switches reveals a similarity in materials, as both the HMX 1989 and the Canglan V2 use nylon for their bottom housings. This shared material results in a deeper and more rounded sound profile, attributed to nylon's ability to absorb sound vibrations effectively. The bottom housing plays a crucial role in shaping the overall typing experience, particularly in terms of the bottom-out sound and tactile feel. Regardless of the disparity between top housings, both switches will deliver a consistent depth of sound from the nylon bottom. Hence, users can expect similar feedback and audio characteristics from the bottom section of both switches, which is a crucial aspect of their performance.
In summary, the key distinction between the HMX 1989 and the Canglan V2 lies in the materials used for their top housing, with polycarbonate yielding a sharper sound against nylon's mellower tones. However, both switches share nylon in their bottom housings, which helps create a rich and full auditory experience when typing. Ultimately, the combination of the two types of housings in each model allows for unique sound profiles that can cater to different preferences; thus, users can achieve a satisfying typing experience regardless of the switch they choose. This harmonization of materials demonstrates how the compatibility of different housing types can enhance the acoustics and overall performance of mechanical switches.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Canglan V2 linear switch, key differences in their actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The HMX 1989 requires an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light option suitable for those who appreciate a balance between responsiveness and tactile feedback. In contrast, the Canglan V2 features a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, appealing to users who prefer a less strenuous typing experience, perfect for extended use. While both switches offer smooth linear action, the lighter Canglan V2 is better suited for those who type or game for long periods without fatigue, whereas the 1989 offers a slightly firmer feel for those who enjoy a more substantial push. Overall, the 1989 is heavier in both actuation and bottom out forces compared to the Canglan V2, catering to different preferences in typing dynamics.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Canglan V2 linear switch, we find a notable difference. The HMX 1989 has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is typical of traditional switches and offers a more pronounced feel, appealing to those who prefer a deeper key press. In contrast, the HMX Canglan V2 features a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, a choice increasingly favored by gamers for its quicker response times. While both switches serve different preferences, the 1989's longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying tactile experience for users who enjoy a fuller depth, whereas the Canglan V2 is ideal for those who favor a snappier, more responsive action. Thus, the HMX 1989 stands as the longer option, while the HMX Canglan V2 takes the title for the shorter travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Canglan V2 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Canglan V2 for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is best known for its deep, thocky acoustic profile, making it a standout choice for those who enjoy a pronounced sound during their typing experience. Similarly, the HMX Canglan V2 also boasts a satisfyingly deep sound signature that has captured the attention of enthusiasts, indicating that both switches share a preference for rich auditory feedback. It is important to note that the overall sound can be influenced by various factors, such as the keyboard chassis and keycap materials used, but users can expect a thocky resonance from both switches, which can enhance the tactile satisfaction of typing.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 is recognized for its smoothness and the pleasant tactile experience it provides to the user, contributing to an enjoyable typing rhythm. On the other hand, the HMX Canglan V2 is described as having a smooth, light feel, which may make it particularly appealing for users who prefer a switch that doesn’t require much force to press down. While both switches offer a smooth action, the 1989 might provide a slightly heavier and denser sensation compared to the lighter feel of the Canglan V2, catering to different preferences in tactile feedback and typing comfort.
In conclusion, the HMX 1989 and HMX Canglan V2 linear switches exhibit similar qualities that cater to enthusiasts' desires for a rich sound and smooth operation, each with its unique nuances. Both switches offer a deep, thocky acoustic experience that many users savor, while the tactile feedback varies slightly, catering to diverse preferences with the 1989 potentially offering a denser feel compared to the lighter Canglan V2. Selecting between the two largely depends on individual taste and the specific typing experience one seeks, but either choice promises a delightful typing experience characteristic of HMX switches.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Canglan V2 should hinge on your typing preferences and usage scenarios. If you enjoy a slightly heavier feel with a bottom out force of 53 grams and prioritize a deeper, thocky sound that resonates with the classic gaming experience, the HMX 1989 is your best bet. This switch captures the essence of nostalgia with its thockiest profile, which can enhance both gaming and typing experiences, particularly for those who appreciate tactile feedback on each keystroke. Conversely, if you lean towards a lighter touch with a bottom out force of 48 grams and prefer a smooth, satisfying feel under your fingertips, the Canglan V2 will serve you well. With its refined materials and design that deliver a distinctly deep sound signature while maintaining a whisper-light action, this switch is perfect for prolonged typing sessions or for those who enjoy a rapid key press in gaming without fatigue. Ultimately, your decision is about finding the balance between sound, feel, and the level of resistance that suits your unique typing style.
Mentioned in this article
