HMX Game1989 vs. KTT Darling
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the KTT Darling switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and the KTT Darling stand out as two intriguing options in the realm of linear switches, each offering unique characteristics that may cater to different preferences. The HMX 1989, celebrated for its deep and 'thocky' sound profile, provides a satisfying typing experience that many gamers appreciate for its durability and responsiveness. This switch shines in gaming scenarios where quick keystrokes and reliability are paramount. On the other hand, the KTT Darling brings a delightful feel to the table with its chewy sensation and pronounced bounciness, offering a typing experience that some users find more substantial and enjoyable for prolonged use. The Darling's high-pitched, resonant acoustics not only contribute a lively auditory element but also enhance the tactile feedback of each press, making it a fun choice for those who enjoy engaging feedback while typing. While both switches possess their advantages, they cater to slightly different user needs and preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the KTT Darling both feature polycarbonate as the material for their top housings, which results in a shared sound profile characterized by clarity and resonance. The use of polycarbonate—a stiffer plastic—contributes to producing a sharper, higher-pitched sound when keys are pressed. This distinctive sonic attribute stems from polycarbonate’s ability to transmit sound waves efficiently, making it particularly advantageous for enthusiasts who value the auditory feedback from their switches. Additionally, both switches leverage the translucency of polycarbonate to enhance the visual experience, especially when RGB lighting is incorporated, further merging aesthetics with audio performance.
Conversely, the bottom housings of both the HMX 1989 and KTT Darling are crafted from nylon, another common material choice in switch design. Unlike polycarbonate’s firm nature, nylon is a softer plastic that tends to absorb sound waves more effectively, leading to a sound profile that is deeper and fuller. This results in a noticeable difference in the overall typing experience; users will notice that the bottoming-out sound from these switches feels rounder and less harsh. The incorporation of nylon in the bottom housing of both switches creates a harmonious contrast, allowing the softer, warmer characteristics of the nylon to complement the sharper tones produced by the polycarbonate tops.
While both switches incorporate the same materials for their respective housings, the interplay between the stiffer polycarbonate top and the softer nylon bottom creates a multifaceted auditory experience. Since the qualities of the top and bottom housings combine to influence the tactile and acoustic feedback during use, both switches yield similar results in terms of performance, albeit with nuanced differences. The clearer, more resonant top helps ensure a pronounced auditory response when keys are released, while the deeper sound of the nylon base contributes richness during the key press. This combination showcases how different materials can work together to achieve a balanced and appealing performance profile in mechanical switches.
Weight
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Darling linear switch share identical specifications in both actuation force and bottom out force, with each requiring a force of 45 grams to trigger a keystroke and 53 grams to bottom out. This means users of either switch can expect a similar typing experience characterized by a medium-light touch, making both options suitable for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons without significant fatigue. Given their equal weights, neither switch is classified as significantly lighter or heavier than the other; thus, users looking for a light feel while typing or gaming can confidently choose either switch without worrying about a difference in actuation or bottom out forces.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Darling linear switch, there is a noticeable difference. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the KTT Darling has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the HMX 1989 provides a more traditional, deeper feel, which can be ideal for those who prefer a heavier keypress that offers more substantial feedback during typing. In contrast, the KTT Darling's 3.5 mm travel distance may be preferable for gamers or users seeking faster response times, as shorter travel distances are typically associated with quicker actuation. Thus, if responsiveness is a priority, the KTT Darling would be the better choice, whereas those valuing a more robust typing experience might lean towards the HMX 1989.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The KTT Darling has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Darling for $3.90.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by a deep, thocky tone that is prominent within the HMX Film switch series, providing a rich auditory experience that many typists and gamers find satisfying. In contrast, the KTT Darling offers a very different sound profile; it produces a clacky and high-pitched sound that is crisp and bright, resembling a sharp, snappy note upon actuation. This resonant quality enhances the typing experience with an immersive auditory feedback that may appeal to those who appreciate a more engaging sound while typing. However, it’s essential to consider that the final sound output can be influenced by the choice of keyboard plate and keycaps, which can either amplify or dampen these characteristics.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 has not been explicitly detailed; however, the KTT Darling linear switch is known for its bouncy and elastic feedback, offering a lively sensation with each keystroke. Users will experience a delightful rebound that adds to the engagement of typing, making it feel rewarding and dynamic. Without detailed information on the HMX 1989 feel, it is challenging to compare directly, but it may provide a similarly satisfying experience if geared towards responsive linear switches.
Considering all the provided information, the HMX 1989 and KTT Darling linear switches are positioned to cater to different preferences in auditory enjoyment and tactile feedback. The deep, thocky sound of the 1989 offers a contrasting experience to the bright, resonant qualities of the Darling, while the bouncy feedback of the Darling provides a unique typing sensation. Ultimately, if you prefer a more substantial and tactile experience, the KTT Darling may be the ideal choice. Nonetheless, both switches have their merits, and individuals seeking similar results in feel or sound might experience satisfaction depending on their unique typing style and preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Darling linear switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences for sound and feel. If you're seeking a switch known for its deep, thocky acoustics and a more subtle typing experience, the HMX 1989 could be the right fit for you, especially if you prefer a switch that maintains a balanced sound profile without being overly sharp. This switch, with its medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams, is ideal if you enjoy a solid yet unobtrusive typing experience. On the other hand, if you want a switch that offers an engaging auditory experience combined with a pronounced tactile sensation, the KTT Darling is the way to go. Its chewy and substantial feel, paired with a bouncy feedback and clacky, high-pitched sound, provides a vibrant typing atmosphere that many users find exhilarating. This switch also features the same medium-light bottom-out force, making it comfortable for prolonged use, but it truly excels in delivering a lively, responsive feel. Ultimately, consider what aspects of a switch matter most to you—whether it's the acoustics and a more subdued tapping experience of the HMX 1989 or the lively, bouncy feedback and crisp sound profile of the KTT Darling—and make your choice accordingly.
Mentioned in this article
