HMX 1989 vs. Akko Dracula
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the Akko Dracula switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing mechanical keyboard switches, two noteworthy options are the HMX 1989 and the Akko Dracula, both of which are linear switches that cater to distinct preferences. The HMX 1989, celebrated for its deep and thocky sound profile, provides an immersive typing experience that many gamers and typists crave, making it ideal for those who appreciate tactile feedback without the clicky noise. On the other hand, the Akko Dracula excels with its innovative use of POK material, offering ultra-smooth keystrokes and enhanced durability; its design features an extra stem hole that promotes improved airflow and overall typing fluidity, appealing to users who prioritize a seamless and responsive feel. While both switches provide linear actuation, your choice might come down to whether you prefer the ‘thocky’ resonance of the HMX 1989 or the smooth, airy typing experience of the Akko Dracula. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the ideal switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POK
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the HMX 1989 and the Akko Dracula, the choice of housing materials plays a significant role in shaping the overall performance and sound profile of each switch. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched sound, attributed to its stiffer nature. This stiffness enhances clarity, providing a more resonant auditory experience, especially when integrated with RGB lighting, enhancing both aesthetics and performance. In contrast, the Akko Dracula opts for a POK top housing, a material renowned for its smoothness and extraordinary durability. While it does not share the same properties as polycarbonate, the added friction reduction and strength of POK contribute to a different, but equally impressive tactile experience, allowing for an enjoyable typing feel that might slightly lean towards a “clacky” sound profile.
The bottom housing of both switches is made from nylon, a classic choice in switch design that brings a deep and full sound profile when typing. Both the HMX 1989 and the Akko Dracula, sharing this nylon base, evoke a similar auditory experience due to nylon's inherent acoustic properties. As a softer plastic, nylon absorbs sound more efficiently than harder materials, leading to a richer and more rounded typing sound. Despite the differences in their top housings, the nylon bottoms create a sense of consistency between the two switches, ensuring that the deeper sound characteristic remains predominant during typing, particularly when the switch bottoms out.
Ultimately, the interplay between the different materials in the top and bottom housings affects how each switch feels and sounds in use. With the polycarbonate top of the HMX 1989 providing a crisp sound upon release and the nylon bottom enhancing the fullness of the typing experience, there is a clear distinction in their overall performance. In comparison, the Akko Dracula marries POK's durability and smoothness with nylon's inviting warmth and richness. While the top housings diverge in material and sound profile, the commonality of the nylon bottom means both switches will elicit similar results in terms of depth and fullness in sound, showcasing how diverse housing choices can impact the overall typing experience while sharing foundational similarities.
Weight
When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Akko Dracula linear switch, notable differences in weight and feel emerge. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, positioning it in the medium-light category. In contrast, the Akko Dracula features a lighter actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it distinctly lighter than its counterpart. This difference means that typists who prefer a lighter switch might find the Akko Dracula more comfortable for extended periods, especially during lengthy typing or gaming sessions. On the other hand, those who appreciate a more substantial typing experience may lean toward the HMX 1989 due to its heavier feel. Ultimately, the lighter actuation force of the Dracula offers a quicker response with less exertion, while the 1989 provides a more tactile resistance that some users may prefer.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Akko Dracula linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. This means that the 1989 is designed for users who prefer a more substantial keypress with a deeper feel, which can enhance typing comfort and precision for those who appreciate a traditional switch experience. In contrast, the Dracula switch's shorter 3.8 mm travel distance caters to gamers and users seeking quicker response times, allowing for faster actuation during rapid keystrokes. For those who prefer a more responsive feel and don't mind the abruptness that comes with shorter travel distances, the Akko Dracula may be the better choice. Overall, if a user favors a hearty depth in their keypress, the HMX 1989 would be preferable due to its longer travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The Akko Dracula has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Dracula for $3.29.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deep and thocky acoustic profile, making it an appealing choice for enthusiasts who value a richer auditory experience while typing or gaming. This thocky sound is often associated with a satisfying bottom-out noise, contributing to a full, resonant feel that can enhance the overall typing experience. Conversely, the Akko Dracula switch, while also a linear option, does not have specific sound characteristics detailed, but its design often suggests a smoother sound profile due to the use of POK material, which tends to dampen higher-pitched noises. However, the overall sound experience will significantly depend on the pairing with different boards and keycaps, so while the 1989 offers a definitive thock, the Dracula may provide a subtler and smoother auditory output.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 switch is celebrated for its deep knife-like actuation, which can deliver a heavier and more solid tactile experience. This weightiness can provide users with a more deliberate typing action, great for intensive gaming or writing sessions. On the other hand, the Akko Dracula linear switch boasts its ultra-smooth typing experience, enhanced by its innovative design that includes an extra stem hole for improved airflow and smoothness. This can translate to a glide-like feel under the fingers, making it appealing for those who prefer a lighter touch and a rapid keypress response. The differences in feel cater to different user preferences, with the 1989 favoring a more pronounced actuation versus the Dracula's silky smoothness.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 and Akko Dracula linear switches offer unique benefits tailored to different typing styles. The 1989's deep thocky sound and solid, deliberate feel cater to users who appreciate a rich auditory experience and robust feedback. In contrast, the Dracula switch prioritizes an ultra-smooth typing experience with its innovative materials and design, appealing to those who value quick and effortless keypresses. Depending on individual preferences for sound and feel, both switches can ultimately deliver satisfying typing experiences, but they shine in different aspects, allowing users to choose according to their specific priorities.
Conclusion
To conclude, when selecting between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Akko Dracula linear switch, your decision should be guided by your specific typing and gaming preferences. If you prefer a moderate level of resistance with a bottom-out force of 53 grams, making it suitable for a combination of typing and gaming with a satisfying thocky feel, the HMX 1989 may be the better choice for you. It excels in providing a deep sound and robust tactile experience, ideal for those who enjoy a pronounced connection with each key press, particularly in gaming scenarios where feedback can enhance your experience. On the other hand, if you are looking for a lighter switch with a bottom-out force of 45 grams that promises ultra-smooth typing and enhanced durability, the Akko Dracula is likely to serve you well. Its innovative design with POK material offers a gentler and smoother touch, making it an excellent option for extended typing sessions, casual gaming, or for those who simply prefer a lighter feel. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on whether you value a firmer, more tactile response over a smoother, lighter touch, tailoring your keyboard experience to suit your unique preferences.
Mentioned in this article
