HMX Game1989 vs. HMX EMO
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the HMX EMO switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and the HMX EMO offer distinct experiences despite both being classified as linear switches. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep and thocky acoustics, making it an excellent choice for gamers and typists who appreciate a more substantial feel and sound during key presses. In contrast, the HMX EMO switches feature a lively, clacky character with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force that promises an effortless and bouncy typing experience. This switch is exceptionally factory-lubed, which enhances the smoothness of each keystroke, making it ideal for those who prioritize speed and comfort in their typing. While both switches cater to users seeking linear action, they provide unique tactile and auditory experiences that may appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
46g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX EMO, it is evident that both switches utilize the same materials, specifically polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing. The polycarbonate top housing in both models contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, as the stiffer plastic enhances clarity and resonance. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate allows for optimal light diffusion in RGB setups, adding aesthetic value to both switches. Consequently, users can expect a similar auditory experience when utilizing either switch, particularly if they favor RGB lighting effects while gaming or typing.
On the other hand, the bottom housings in both models are equipped with nylon, a material known for its softer properties that absorb sound, resulting in a deeper, fuller auditory experience. This characteristic is crucial for sound profiles, as typing on switches featuring nylon produces a more rounded and less sharp sound. Although both models share this material, the subjective typing experience may vary due to other factors such as switch design or mechanics. Nevertheless, both the HMX 1989 and the HMX EMO will provide users with a sound signature that reflects the qualities of nylon, distinguished by its ability to dampen sound and provide a satisfying thock when bottoming out.
In summary, the HMX 1989 and the HMX EMO share identical housing materials, leading to consistent auditory results and a cohesive user experience. The combination of polycarbonate and nylon in both models yields a blend of crispness from the top housing and warmth from the bottom housing, illustrating the importance of material selection in keyboard design. Users can expect that the richness and clarity of sound produced by these switches stem from their shared materials, ensuring that both options deliver a similarly enjoyable typing and gaming experience.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX EMO linear switch, there are noticeable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light, while the HMX EMO has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 46 grams. This means that the EMO requires less force to trigger a keystroke, making it more suitable for long typing sessions or extended gaming, where less strain is preferred. In contrast, the heavier actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX 1989 provide a more substantial feel, appealing to users who enjoy a stronger push when typing. Overall, while both switches offer a quality experience, the HMX EMO is the lighter option, ideal for those who prioritize comfort over prolonged use, whereas the HMX 1989 delivers a firmer feedback for those seeking a more robust typing experience.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX EMO linear switch, there is a noticeable difference: the HMX 1989 features a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX EMO has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that when pressing down on the keys, users will experience a more pronounced depth with the 1989 switch, which may appeal to those who prefer a hearty feel and a traditional typing experience. Conversely, the shorter 3.5 mm travel of the EMO switch caters to gamers and users looking for quicker response times, allowing for swifter key presses. Therefore, if responsiveness is a priority, the HMX EMO would be the preferred choice, while those who favor a deeper engagement with their keys might opt for the HMX 1989.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The HMX EMO has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EMO for $2.79.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When considering the sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch compared to the HMX EMO linear switch, the 1989 is best known for its deep and thocky acoustic signature, providing a satisfying bassy experience that many enthusiasts appreciate. This switch will resonate a rich, low-end sound when pressed, making it enjoyable for those who prefer a fuller auditory feedback while typing or gaming. In contrast, the HMX EMO switch delivers a high-pitched, sharp, and crisp sound, appealing to users who favor a more lively and bright auditory experience. The distinct sound characteristics of the EMO add a layer of excitement to each keystroke, though the prominence of these qualities can also depend on the keyboard’s build and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch tends to offer a different tactile sensation than the EMO. While detailed subjective qualities for the 1989 are not specified, the EMO is characterized by its bouncy feedback, polished smoothness, and an easy-to-press action that minimizes finger fatigue. The bouncy nature of the EMO provides a spring-like sensation, allowing for a fun and responsive typing experience. Its factory lubrication contributes to a seamless key travel, promoting a slick typing feel that is both effortless and enjoyable. For those who prioritize ease and comfort over tactile feedback, the EMO might prove to be the better option.
Overall, both the HMX 1989 and EMO linear switches offer unique auditory and tactile experiences catering to diverse preferences. If you enjoy a deeper, bass-heavy sound along with a potentially different tactile feel, the 1989 could be your choice. Conversely, the EMO offers a light and lively typing experience complemented by a pleasant high-pitched sound. Ultimately, users can expect satisfaction from either switch, but their individual sound and feel signatures will guide your ultimate preference.
Conclusion
In conclusion, choosing between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX EMO linear switch ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prefer a medium-light feel with a heavier bottom-out force of 53 grams, the HMX 1989 might be the right choice for you, especially if you enjoy a deeper, thocky typing experience that provides a satisfying tactile feedback. On the other hand, if you seek a lighter touch with a bottom-out force of just 46 grams, the HMX EMO offers a bouncy, lively feel that promotes an effortless typing experience. With its polished finish and high-pitched sound profile, the EMO could be ideal for those who favor a more energetic and crisp auditory experience. If you’re engaged in fast-paced gaming or typing sessions that require quick actions and minimal finger fatigue, the EMO's easy-to-press nature may serve you well. Ultimately, consider your typing habits and what characteristics matter most to you—the solid, deeper resonance of the 1989 or the lively, refined feedback of the EMO—as both switches provide a unique experience tailored to different preferences.
Mentioned in this article
