HMX 1989 vs. KTT F2
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the KTT F2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the ideal mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and the KTT F2 linear switches each offer unique characteristics that can enhance your typing or gaming experience. The HMX 1989, renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, provides a satisfying auditory feedback that many users find appealing, especially in gaming scenarios where immersion is key. Its heavier actuation force suits those who prefer a more deliberate keystroke. On the other hand, the KTT F2 switches introduce a distinct hollow sound signature that distinguishes them in terms of auditory feedback. With a medium-light weight and a lightly textured feel, the F2 switches embody a comfortable typing experience, striking a balance that feels just right for both typing and gaming. Although both switches fall under the linear category, their unique auditory and tactile qualities set them apart. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX 1989 and KTT F2 switches both incorporate polycarbonate for the top housing, which results in the same sound characteristics: a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This commonality is significant, as polycarbonate is known for its stiffness and ability to create a clearer resonance. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate enhances the aesthetic appeal of these switches when employed with RGB lighting, allowing for an eye-catching illumination effect that is often sought after by users. Since both switches utilize this material in their top housings, the auditory experience generated from these presses will be quite similar, enabling users to expect like performance when it comes to the top-out sound.
In contrast, the bottom housings of the two switches diverge in material choice, with the HMX 1989 utilizing nylon and the KTT F2 equipped with polycarbonate. The nylon used in the 1989’s bottom housing contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile, as it absorbs more sound due to its softer consistency. This quality leads to a dulled and rounded acoustic experience that contrasts with the clearer tones produced by the stiffer polycarbonate material present in the KTT F2’s bottom housing. Consequently, the tactile feedback and bottom-out sound when pressing a key differ notably, with the 1989 offering a more muted response compared to the crisper sound associated with the KTT F2.
The differences in bottom housing materials, therefore, influence the overall switch experience, particularly in how sound and feel are perceived when a user interacts with the switches. For the HMX 1989, the softer nylon bottom provides a sound signature that leans towards a warmer, muted output, while the polycarbonate bottom housing of the KTT F2 ensures a more vibrant and resonant sound profile. This distinction illustrates how important the bottom housing is in shaping the tactile and auditory sensation of each switch, culminating in a user experience that is less comparable than their top housings might suggest. Overall, while their top components yield similar sonic qualities, the bottom materials cause a divergence that could appeal to different preferences among mechanical switch users.
Weight
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT F2 linear switch exhibit similarities and differences in their actuation and bottom out forces that may influence user preference. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams, while the KTT F2 is slightly lighter at 43 grams, making the F2 the better option for those seeking a lighter typing experience. Both switches share the same bottom out force of 53 grams, indicating that, while the KTT F2 requires a slightly lower force to activate a keystroke, both switches have the same feel when pressing down all the way. Users who type for extended periods or engage in lengthy gaming sessions may find that the lighter actuation force of the KTT F2 provides a more comfortable experience. However, those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may gravitate towards the HMX 1989 due to its slightly heavier actuation force. Overall, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation force and typing experience.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT F2 linear switch, there is a notable difference. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with the traditional measurement and may offer a more substantial feel with a hearty depth for users who prefer a tactile experience. In contrast, the KTT F2 has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, appealing to those who seek faster response times, particularly favored by gamers. This shorter distance may provide a more immediate actuation, although some users might find it feels too abrupt. Ultimately, if you prioritize responsiveness, the KTT F2 is the better option, whereas those who enjoy a deeper pressing experience might prefer the HMX 1989.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by its deep and thocky quality, which often resonates well with enthusiasts seeking a rich acoustic experience. This robust sound profile gives it a unique status within the HMX Film switch series, enhancing the tactile joy of each keystroke. On the other hand, the KTT F2 linear switch features a distinctly hollow sound signature, delivering a more neutral and subdued auditory experience. The F2's sound is neither overly loud nor entirely silent, making it a versatile option for various environments, whether you're in an office setting or at home. The complemented sound quality of both switches highlights how personal preferences and context can guide users in choosing the right switch based on sound.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 is not explicitly described but is often associated with an enjoyable typing experience given its thocky quality, which typically implies a satisfying resistance and engagement with every stroke. Contrarily, the KTT F2 linear switch is known for its feathery lightness and mild, subtle characteristics. This results in a comfortable typing experience with minimal exertion required, ideal for prolonged use in gaming or typing tasks. The tactile nuance of the lightly textured F2 switch elevates the engagement during typing, making it approachable for users who may prefer less aggressive feedback.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 and KTT F2 linear switches present distinct yet appealing qualities, catering to different preferences. While the 1989 excels in delivering a deep sound and potentially satisfying tactile feedback, the F2’s hollow sound signature and light, nuanced feel make it suitable for long-term use and a more subdued auditory experience. Choosing between the two will largely depend on your priorities: whether you seek a thocky sound profile or a lightweight, comfortable typing experience. Each switch offers unique characteristics that can lead to enjoyment and efficiency in your typing endeavors, making personal preference and usage context key drivers in the decision-making process.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT F2 linear switch ultimately depends on your preferences for sound, feel, and overall usage environment. If you prioritize a deep thocky sound and enjoy a more substantial auditory experience while typing or gaming, the HMX 1989 is your best bet, especially if you appreciate a medium-light actuation force that balances comfort with responsiveness. However, if you're looking for a more subdued and neutral sound profile that accommodates both quieter environments and social spaces, the KTT F2 will serve you well. Its distinctively hollow sound adds a unique auditory experience, while the feathery and mild feel makes it an excellent option for extended typing sessions, reducing finger fatigue. In essence, choose the 1989 for a richer sound and tactile experience, and the F2 for a gentle touch and versatility in shared spaces. Your choice should reflect not just your typing style but also the environment in which you plan to use your keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
