HMX Game1989 vs. HMX Hibiscus
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the HMX Hibiscus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch for your typing or gaming experience, the HMX 1989 and HMX Hibiscus are two compelling choices, each with its unique characteristics. The HMX 1989 is renowned for its depth and thocky sound, making it a fantastic option for those who appreciate a more robust and resonant keypress. This switch is particularly well-suited for gamers and typists who prefer a more tactile feedback, anchoring their strikes with a satisfying thud. On the other hand, the HMX Hibiscus boasts an ultra-light actuation force that exceeds that of 80% of other switches, delivering an exceptionally smooth typing experience. Its clacky, poppy, and crispy sound profile appeals to those who enjoy an auditory reward with each keystroke, making it ideal for typists who value both lightness and sound in their keyboard experience. Each switch presents compelling reasons for selection, but as we delve deeper into their specific attributes, you'll be better equipped to determine the best switch for your personal style and usage needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
48g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
T3
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the HMX Hibiscus exhibit distinct characteristics in their top housing materials, with the former utilizing polycarbonate and the latter employing nylon. The polycarbonate top housing of the 1989 is particularly notable for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, attributed to the stiffer properties of polycarbonate. This material's translucency enhances the effectiveness of RGB lighting setups, making it aesthetically appealing for users who prioritize visual enhancements in their mechanical keyboards. Conversely, the nylon top housing of the Hibiscus generates a deeper, fuller sound profile. As a softer plastic, nylon absorbs more sound, creating a darker resonance that contrasts with the brightness of polycarbonate. Consequently, while both switches can deliver unique auditory experiences, the 1989 is more oriented toward clarity and brightness, whereas the Hibiscus emphasizes warmth and depth.
In terms of bottom housing, both the HMX 1989 and the HMX Hibiscus feature nylon materials, resulting in a shared attribute of deeper sound profiles. This similarity in bottom housing contributes to a consistent bottom-out sound and tactile experience when keys are pressed. The characteristics of nylon—its softer nature and sound absorption—mean that both models have an underlying warmth in their auditory feedback when bottoming out. While the top housings diverge in tonality, the shared use of nylon in the bottom housing helps to unify the overall sound experience for both switches. This aspect illustrates that while the tonal qualities provided by the top housing may differ, the foundational characteristics of both switches remain connected through their nylon lower sections.
When considering the overall playing experience with these switches, the differences in top housing materials will impact the audible and tactile feedback during key presses and releases. The 1989’s polycarbonate top housing will provide a clear, sharp sound when releasing keys, contributing to a more pronounced auditory experience. In contrast, the Hibiscus will produce a sound that is more rounded and full, creating a softer auditory profile upon release. However, since both switches share the same nylon bottom housing, they will maintain a congruent foundational feel, allowing users to experience certain similarities in terms of sound and tactile feedback. Thus, while the switches offer different auditory aesthetics, relying on a common bottom housing material ensures that key characteristics remain alike, providing a cohesive typing experience across both models.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Hibiscus linear switch, notable differences in actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the HMX Hibiscus has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, placing it in the light category. This means that the Hibiscus provides a more effortless keystroke, potentially making it more comfortable for extended typing sessions. The lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Hibiscus may appeal to users who prioritize ease of use, such as those who type for long periods or engage in extended gaming sessions. On the other hand, the 1989's higher weights may deliver a more substantial typing experience for users who prefer a stronger push feel. Overall, users looking for a lighter switch would likely gravitate towards the HMX Hibiscus, whereas those who enjoy a heavier touch might prefer the HMX 1989.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Hibiscus linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means the 1989 provides a more substantial keystroke feel, which some users may prefer for its depth and feedback, offering a traditional typing experience. In contrast, the Hibiscus, with its shorter 3.5 mm travel distance, caters to those who desire quicker response times, making it an appealing choice for gamers and users who favor speed over depth. The difference in travel distance highlights the distinct preferences that users may have, with the HMX Hibiscus being the shorter option and the HMX 1989 offering a more pronounced key travel. If you're looking for a balance between responsiveness and key travel feel, the choices between these switches will ultimately depend on your personal preference.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Hibiscus has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hibiscus for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deep, thocky quality, which provides a solid and resonant auditory experience that many enthusiasts find pleasing. This sound signature is often likened to a bass-heavy rumble, making it particularly satisfying for those who appreciate a more pronounced acoustic feedback. On the other hand, the HMX Hibiscus offers a distinctly different auditory profile characterized by a clackier, poppy, and crispy sound. This switch’s sound is more high-pitched and lively, delivering a bright, sharp auditory cue with each keystroke. It's important to note that the final sound can still depend heavily on the keyboard build and keycap material, meaning users may experience variations in both switches when placed in different setups.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 switch is recognized for its robust and substantial typing experience, which is often reinforced by its thocky sound profile. The feedback it provides can enhance a sense of stability while typing, making it a favorite for gamers and typists seeking tactile satisfaction. In contrast, the HMX Hibiscus switch boasts an ultra-light actuation force, which sets it apart by promoting effortless key presses. This switch is designed with a smoothness that enables quick and comfortable typing, creating a gentle and responsive sensation under the fingers, ideal for those who prioritize speed and fluidity over resistance.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 and HMX Hibiscus switches offer unique yet enjoyable experiences that cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard users. The 1989 emphasizes a deeper sound and satisfying stability in feel, while the Hibiscus excels in its crisp sound signature and ultra-light, smooth actuation. Depending on your typing style and auditory preferences, you can achieve distinct yet enjoyable results with either switch. For users interested in experimentation, the auditory experience can be tailored further through the choice of keyboard and keycaps, allowing for a customized typing environment regardless of the switch chosen.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Hibiscus linear switch, your personal preferences and usage scenarios will ultimately guide your choice. If you find yourself gravitating toward a switch that offers a medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams, along with a deep and thocky feel, the HMX 1989 will likely suit you well, especially for gaming purposes where a responsive yet firm actuation is desirable. Its sound profile adds to the experience, giving a satisfying thock that many users appreciate. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch with a bottom-out force of just 48 grams, the HMX Hibiscus switch shines with its ultra-smooth actuation and clacky sound signature, making it an excellent choice for typing enthusiasts who favor a poppy and crispy feedback. Ultimately, if you seek a tactile and deeper keystroke experience while gaming, lean towards the 1989; conversely, if you want a delightful and refined typing experience with a lighter touch, the Hibiscus would be the way to go.
Mentioned in this article
