HMX 1989 vs. Aflion Iceberg

Overview

When exploring mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts often gravitate towards options that reflect their typing style and preferences. The HMX 1989, hailed for its "thocky" deep sound, stands out in the HMX Film switch series as a true contender for gamers and typists seeking a rich auditory feedback while typing. Its robust build and satisfying depth can provide a grounded experience that many users find satisfying. In contrast, the Aflion Iceberg offers a more modern take with its snappy, high-pitched qualities, thanks to its two-stage spring design that delivers a smooth and fulfilling tactile experience. Aflion, though a newcomer to the switch manufacturing scene, has quickly gained recognition for producing high-quality switches, with the Iceberg being a strong representation of this. While both switches fall into the linear category and promise pleasurable typing experiences, they embody distinct characteristics that cater to different user preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX 1989 Linear

Aflion Iceberg Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$3.50

$3.07 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

Both the HMX 1989 and the Aflion Iceberg utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, and this contributes significantly to the auditory characteristics of each switch. The use of polycarbonate, known for its stiffness, results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This similarity in materials leads to analogous responses in terms of sound quality, especially when RGB lighting is employed. The translucency of polycarbonate enhances its aesthetic value, allowing light to pass through and illuminate the switch, which can heighten the visual experience for users. Therefore, both switches can achieve similarly radiant and defined sound signatures under RGB lighting conditions.

In contrast, the bottom housing of both switches is made from nylon, a material famed for its softer composition compared to polycarbonate. This results in a deeper and fuller sound profile, as nylon tends to absorb sound waves rather than reflect them. The combination of the nylon bottom housing with the polycarbonate top housing in both models creates a balanced auditory experience, with the nylon dampening higher frequencies and the polycarbonate accentuating them. When typing, the feel of the switch is informed primarily by the nylon, which contributes to a softer and more rounded audible feedback during key presses, making the user experience more enjoyable and less harsh.

By examining both the HMX 1989 and the Aflion Iceberg, it becomes evident that despite the use of different materials for their bottom housings, the shared polycarbonate top housing leads to a crisp and clear sound profile in both switches. The nylon bottom housing enhances the overall sound experience with its warmth and depth, establishing a unique auditory balance between the two materials. Thus, while both switches share core characteristics due to their common materials, the divergence in design allows each to deliver its own distinctive touch to the key-press experience, ensuring users enjoy a rich and fulfilling encounter with either switch.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Iceberg linear switch, there is a notable difference in both actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 requires an actuation force of 45 grams and has a bottom out force of 53 grams, positioning it as a medium-light option. In contrast, the Aflion Iceberg boasts a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. This makes the Iceberg more suitable for users who prefer a lighter typing experience, ideal for extended usage or lengthy gaming sessions. The HMX 1989, being heavier, offers a more substantial push feel, which some users may prefer for a more tactile typing experience. Ultimately, those seeking a lighter switch should opt for the Aflion Iceberg, while those who enjoy a firmer feedback might lean towards the HMX 1989.

Travel distance

Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Iceberg linear switch exhibit the same travel distance of 4 mm, meaning that users will experience a similar tactile response when pressing down on the keys of either switch. Since both switches have identical travel distances, users can expect a comparable feel and actuation when typing or gaming, ensuring consistency in their experience across both types. This equal measurement indicates that the switches may perform similarly in terms of feedback and responsiveness, making either choice suitable for individuals seeking uniform key travel.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When comparing the sound characteristics of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Iceberg linear switch, the differences are apparent. The HMX 1989 is renowned for its deep and thocky acoustics, which create a satisfying auditory experience that some users find reminiscent of the resonant tones produced by higher-quality linear switches. In contrast, the Aflion Iceberg is characterized by its clacky and high-pitched sound profile. This sharp and snappy sound can be quite distinct during typing, appealing to those who prefer a brighter and crisper auditory feedback. However, it's crucial to note that the overall sound experience can still vary depending on the keyboard build and keycap material chosen.

Turning to the feel of these switches, the HMX 1989 showcases a rich tactile feedback, but specific descriptors for its feel are not available in this comparison. On the other hand, the Aflion Iceberg is recognized for its snappy responsiveness, aided by a two-stage spring that enhances the typing experience. This switch type also boasts a feathery feel, requiring minimal effort to actuate, which can significantly decrease finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. Additionally, it offers subtle resistance, creating a light but satisfying typing experience that may be more appropriate for shared environments due to its quieter sound profile.

In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 and Aflion Iceberg linear switches possess unique qualities that cater to different preferences. While the 1989 offers a deep and thocky sound paired with an unspecified feel, the Iceberg provides a bright and percussive auditory feedback with a snappy and feathery tactile experience. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you prioritize sound or feel, as well as how those qualities align with your typing habits and environment.

Conclusion

To summarize, choosing between the HMX 1989 and the Aflion Iceberg linear switch ultimately boils down to your personal preferences and intended use. If you prefer a heavier switch that offers a deeper and more "thocky" sound, the HMX 1989 might be your ideal choice. This switch is particularly suited for users who appreciate a more substantial feel when typing or gaming, making it a noteworthy option for those seeking a tactile and resonant feedback experience. Conversely, if you lean towards a lighter typing experience with a responsiveness that feels alive, the Aflion Iceberg would be more appropriate. Its lighter bottom-out force and snappy feel are perfect for long typing sessions or fast-paced gaming, reducing finger fatigue while delivering a crisp, high-pitched sound that stands out. Ultimately, the choice between these switches should reflect your typing style, the environment you’ll be using them in, and how much weight you prefer in your key presses.

Mentioned in this article

HMX 1989 Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

Aflion Iceberg Linear

$3.50

$3.07 per 10

Learn more