HMX Game1989 vs. Gateron Ink Box Pink
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Gateron Ink Box Pink switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and Gateron Ink Box Pink present distinct, yet appealing options for different typing preferences. The HMX 1989, recognized for its deep, thocky sound profile, is ideal for those who appreciate a more substantial acoustic feedback and a solid typing experience, making it a favorite among gamers and typists who enjoy a pronounced bottom-out sound. On the other hand, the Gateron Ink Box Pink switches stand out for their smooth operation and lighter typing feel, generating a higher-pitched clack that many users find enjoyable, particularly for prolonged typing sessions where quick responsiveness is paramount. While the HMX 1989 offers a rich, low-end sound signature perfect for tactile feedback, the Ink Box Pink entices users with its silky feel and polished quality. Ultimately, the choice between these switches comes down to personal preference, but however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Gateron Ink Box Pink, one can observe distinct differences in both sound profile and material characteristics. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing that is lauded for its ability to create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The rigidity of polycarbonate contributes to a more resonant sound, making it particularly suitable for switches aimed at users who appreciate clarity in their keypress sounds. Furthermore, polycarbonate's translucent nature allows RGB lighting to shine through effectively, adding an aesthetic layer to functionality. In contrast, the Ink Box Pink utilizes a proprietary INK blend for its top housing, which, while also producing a pointed and relatively high-pitched sound, does so without coming across as overly sharp. The Ink Box Pink's sound may be described as clacky, suggesting a playful quality that appeals to different tactile preferences compared to the HMX 1989's crisper output.
Turning to the bottom housings, we again notice a stark contrast in materials and their resulting auditory characteristics. The HMX 1989 employs nylon for its bottom housing, which is a traditional choice known for delivering a deeper, fuller sound profile. As nylon absorbs more sound than stiffer plastics, it results in a more rounded auditory experience that can be more soothing for prolonged typing sessions. On the other hand, the Ink Box Pink also features a proprietary INK blend as its bottom housing, seemingly maintaining a consistency in sound profile similar to the top housing. Such a setup may create a unique auditory signature for the Ink Box Pink that is high-pitched and clacky, differing significantly from the substantial depth provided by the nylon bottom housing of the HMX 1989.
In combining both elements, the overall typing experience exhibited by each switch reflects the interplay between their respective housing materials. For the HMX 1989, the combination of the sharp polycarbonate top and the deep nylon bottom creates a balanced sound that emphasizes clarity when releasing keys and fullness upon bottoming out. Meanwhile, the Ink Box Pink's dual proprietary INK blend housing contributes to a consistently high-pitched sound profile for both keypresses and releases, allowing users to achieve a clacky auditory sensation. While the two switches diverge in their acoustic and tactile experiences due to their varied housing materials, both can yield satisfying results tailored to individual preferences, demonstrating how distinct materials can harmonize within the framework of mechanical keyboard switches.
Weight
When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch, key differences emerge. The 1989 switch has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, positioning it as a medium-light option that could be favored for extended typing or gaming sessions due to its reduced resistance. In contrast, the Ink Box Pink has a heavier actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, categorizing it as a medium-strength option. This difference means that the Ink Box Pink requires more effort to press, making it suitable for those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, users looking for a lighter switch would likely opt for the HMX 1989, while those who appreciate a heavier tactile feedback might lean towards the Gateron Ink Box Pink.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch, a clear difference emerges. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with the traditional standard and provides a more pronounced tactile experience. In contrast, the Gateron Ink Box Pink has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. This difference may appeal more to gamers seeking quicker response times, as the shorter distance allows for faster actuation. However, some individuals might find the abrupt feel of the shorter switch to be less desirable. Ultimately, if you prefer a deeper, more nuanced typing experience, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice, while those looking for efficiency in key presses may find the Gateron Ink Box Pink appealing with its reduced travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Gateron Ink Box Pink has an MSRP of $8.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Ink Box Pink for $7.65.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by a deep and thocky tone, which provides a bass-rich auditory experience that many typists find satisfying. This switch is designed to deliver a low-end presence that contrasts with sharper, higher-pitched sounds, often making it a favorite for gamers and those who appreciate a more substantial acoustic feedback. In comparison, the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch offers a distinctly higher-pitched clack, producing a crisp, bright, and percussive sound that stands out with its snappier quality. This makes the Ink Box Pink more suited for those who prefer a sharper auditory feedback while typing, resulting in a keyboard experience that can feel more lively and engaging.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 is known for its substantial and cushioned keystroke, offering a satisfying resistance that some typists favor for its tactile feedback, although specific details about its feel are not provided. On the other hand, the Ink Box Pink is noted for its silky and polished experience, allowing for an exceptionally smooth typing motion. The reduced friction and refined finish make the Ink Box Pink feel effortless to press, resulting in a more fluid typing experience that can appeal to users who value speed and smoothness.
In conclusion, the HMX 1989 and Gateron Ink Box Pink switches cater to different preferences in sound and feel. The HMX 1989 thrives on a deep and thocky sound with a solid and cushioned feel, perfect for those who enjoy heavier, bass-oriented auditory experiences. Conversely, the Ink Box Pink impresses with its higher-pitched clack and a smooth, effortless typing feel. While both switches offer unique qualities, those seeking a more pronounced punch might lean toward the HMX 1989, while those desiring a lighter, refined typing experience will likely favor the Ink Box Pink. Ultimately, choosing between them will be determined by personal preference and the specific typing experience you wish to achieve.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences for feel, sound, and typing experience. If you lean towards a switch that features a deeper, thockier sound profile and you appreciate a medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams, then the HMX 1989 is likely your best choice. It offers a rich tactile experience that some users find incredibly satisfying, especially for gaming or typing scenarios where a pronounced sound and feel enhance engagement. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother and more polished typing experience, the Gateron Ink Box Pink with its higher bottom-out force of 60 grams and silky feel may be more up your alley. Known for its clacky, high-pitched sound, this switch is ideal for those who enjoy a brighter auditory feedback while typing. Therefore, consider your typing habits and sound preferences: the HMX 1989 excels with a thocky personality while the Ink Box Pink offers a sleek and vibrant typing experience. Each switch caters to different vibes, making them uniquely suitable for various usage scenarios.
Mentioned in this article
