HMX Game1989 vs. HMX Jelly
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the HMX Jelly switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and HMX Jelly offer two appealing options for enthusiasts who prefer linear switches, each with its own distinctive characteristics. The HMX 1989 is renowned for its deep and pronounced thock, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize auditory feedback and a satisfying bottom-out feel while typing or gaming. On the other hand, the HMX Jelly stands out with its super smooth operation, enhanced by exceptional factory lubrication and a lightweight actuation force of just 42 grams, making it ideal for those who value a nimble and responsive typing experience. While both switches provide a linear feel, the HMX 1989 appeals to those who enjoy a more robust sound profile, whereas the HMX Jelly attracts users seeking a sleek and effortless keystroke. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that meets your specific preferences and needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
48g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
T2
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm extended single-stage spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the HMX Jelly showcase distinct differences in their top housing materials, which greatly influence their sound profiles during use. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, renowned for its rigidity and strength. This material creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound that many enthusiasts find desirable, especially for applications involving RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the HMX Jelly utilizes a nylon top housing, which produces a deeper, fuller sound profile. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs sound rather than reflecting it, resulting in a more warm and rounded acoustic output. This dichotomy in materials provides users with two unique auditory experiences, with the 1989 favoring brightness and clarity, while the Jelly offers a more muted and softer overall sound.
Interestingly, both the HMX 1989 and HMX Jelly share similarities in their bottom housing materials, as both employ nylon. This shared construction means that regardless of the top housing differences, users can expect a consistent foundational sound quality characterized by a fuller acoustic response. The nylon bottom housing effectively absorbs sound and produces a deeper bottoming-out experience, contributing to a harmonious typing sound profile throughout different keystrokes. Therefore, even though the top housings differ, the inclusion of nylon in the bottom housing helps create a balanced auditory experience for both switches by instilling a sense of depth and fullness.
In practice, the combined effects of these materials mean that one can achieve varied typing experiences and sound profiles through just a single aspect of the switch design—the housing. When pressed, the qualities of the different top and bottom housings interact dynamically; the polycarbonate top of the HMX 1989 enhances the sound when keys are released, while the nylon bottom supports a resonant and full sound when keys are pressed. Conversely, the Jelly's entirely nylon structure maintains that deeper sound but alters the dynamics of responsiveness. Therefore, while each switch may produce its unique characteristics, the influence of the bottom housing is a constant factor ensuring a pleasant typing experience in each case.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Jelly linear switch, notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as a medium-light switch. In contrast, the HMX Jelly features a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, making it a better choice for users who prefer a softer touch. Consequently, the Jelly is the lighter switch overall, appealing to those who type for extended periods or engage in long gaming sessions without the fatigue that can accompany heavier switches. Meanwhile, the 1989’s heavier actuation and bottom out forces provide a more substantial typing experience for users who favor a firmer response. Both switches will yield similar results in terms of key travel feel, but the HMX Jelly’s lighter specifications can offer a more effortless typing experience.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Jelly linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. This difference signifies that the 1989 offers a more pronounced feel as you press down on the key, catering to those who appreciate a hearty depth in their switch experience. On the other hand, the Jelly, with its shorter 3.8 mm distance, is designed for those who favor a more responsive touch, making it particularly appealing to gamers seeking quicker actuation and faster response times. Therefore, if you prefer a longer travel distance for a more substantial keystroke, the 1989 would be the better choice, while the Jelly's shorter distance may suit users who enjoy a snappier feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Jelly has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Jelly for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, both the HMX 1989 and the HMX Jelly linear switches produce a deep, thocky sound signature, reflecting their design intentions to deliver a satisfying auditory feedback. The 1989 is renowned for its profound and resonance-laden acoustics, making it one of the most thocky options in the HMX Film switch series. Similarly, the Jelly switches also maintain a low-pitched sound profile, ensuring that users experience a rich auditory feedback. However, while both switches align on the deeper thocky characteristic, the ultimate sound quality may vary based on factors such as the keyboard plate material and the type of keycaps used.
When it comes to the feel of the switches, the HMX 1989 is known for its deep and cushioned keystroke, often highlighted for providing an exceptionally plush typing experience. This density contributes to an overall weighted sensation that many gamers and typists find satisfying. Conversely, the Jelly switches are engineered for a lighter touch, featuring a 42g actuation force that promotes effortless typing flow. Though the Jelly may not provide the same level of density as the 1989, its smoothness is enhanced by excellent factory lubrication, making it a dream for those who prefer a lighter, gliding feel. Ultimately, this means that while both switches have their unique tactile experiences, the 1989 offers a heavier, more solid feel, while the Jelly caters to those seeking lighter, effortless keystrokes.
In conclusion, while the HMX 1989 and HMX Jelly linear switches share some auditory characteristics, they diverge when it comes to feel — the 1989's deeper and denser keystrokes contrast with the Jelly's smooth and lightweight touch. Both switches excel in creating a rich audio backdrop, appealing to users who appreciate a thocky sound profile. Ultimately, your choice between the two will hinge on your preference for either a more substantial tactile feel or a lighter, gliding experience, with each option delivering unique benefits tailored to different typing styles and preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Jelly linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing or gaming style. If you prioritize a slightly heavier feel with a bottom out force of 53 grams and enjoy a thocky sound signature that adds depth to your typing experience, then the HMX 1989 would be a great fit for you. This switch excels in providing a tactile satisfaction that many typists and gamers find appealing, especially if you prefer a more pronounced response with each keystroke. On the other hand, if you lean towards a lighter touch with a bottom out force of 48 grams, the HMX Jelly is engineered for a super smooth experience due to its excellent factory lube. Its low-pitched, deep sound signature adds to the sensory pleasure, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy a more effortless typing feel and prefer a more muted sound profile. In summary, your decision may hinge on whether you value a thockier sensation and a slightly heavier resistance with the 1989 or the ultra-light, smooth feel of the Jelly.
Mentioned in this article
