HMX Game1989 vs. Durock Koala
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Durock Koala switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switches can significantly influence your typing experience, and two popular options are the HMX 1989 and the Durock Koala. The HMX 1989, a linear switch, is celebrated for its deep and thocky sound profile, making it a favorite among gamers and typists who appreciate a smooth and uninterrupted keystroke without tactile bumps. This switch offers a unique auditory experience, ideal for those who prefer the minimalistic feel of a linear switch. On the other hand, the Durock Koala is a tactile switch that strikes a balance for users who enjoy a pronounced bump without overwhelming resistance. Its stepped tactility and polished feel provide just the right amount of feedback, giving users the satisfaction of knowing they've registered a keystroke without an excessively loud sound. While the 1989 excels in smoothness and sound, the Koala shines in providing tactile engagement without overwhelming loudness. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the ideal switch for your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Durock Koala, one notable similarity is the use of polycarbonate for the top housing in both switches. This choice results in a distinct sound profile characterized by sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper audio feedback. Since polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic, it enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound produced when typing. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate allows for optimal RGB lighting effects, making both switches visually appealing for those who prioritize aesthetic functionality in their keyboard setup. The shared elements in their top housing design hint that users can expect a similarly bright auditory experience when interacting with their keyboards, regardless of the brand.
In contrast, while both the HMX 1989 and Durock Koala utilize nylon for their bottom housing, the implications of this softer material create a distinctly different auditory experience. Nylon is known for its ability to absorb sound, leading to a fuller and deeper profile that contrasts with the sharper tones resulting from polycarbonate. Consequently, when users engage with either switch, the nylon bottom housing will dictate the bottom-out sound and feel, contributing to a more rounded auditory experience. As both switches use nylon, users can anticipate a harmonious blend of deeper sounds combined with the crisper tones emerging from the polycarbonate tops, showcasing how different materials complement one another in crafting an overall sound profile.
Ultimately, the combination of polycarbonate in the upper housing and nylon in the lower housing of both switches leads to a unique interplay of sound qualities. Users pressing the keys will experience the polycarbonate's bright resonance upon release, followed by the more subdued, deeper tones produced upon bottoming out due to the nylon. This layered sound experience highlights that while the switches share similar materials, the combination of these materials allows for distinct performance characteristics that dictate how each switch responds to user input. Thus, despite any differences, the resulting auditory experiences remain consistently engaging across the two models, showcasing the effectiveness of these material choices in modern keyboard design.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Koala tactile switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams, making it a medium-light option that's conducive to prolonged typing sessions and gaming, as its lower resistance can ease fatigue. In contrast, the Durock Koala has an unknown actuation force but boasts a heavier bottom-out force of 67 grams. This heavier bottom-out would offer a more substantial typing experience, appealing to those who prefer a firmer feel when keys are fully pressed. Consequently, the 1989 is the lighter option overall, while the Koala could be considered the heavier switch based on its bottoming out characteristics alone. If you're looking for a light touch versus a more forceful keystroke, the HMX 1989 is likely the better choice, whereas the Durock Koala would cater to those who want a more robust typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Koala tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when pressing either switch, you will experience an identical distance as you depress the key from the top to the bottom. As a result, users can expect similar keystroke feedback and responsiveness when using either switch, making both an equally viable option for those who prefer consistent travel distances in their typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Durock Koala has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Koala for $4.21.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is known for its deep and thocky character, creating a rich, resonant acoustic profile that appeals to enthusiasts seeking a satisfying auditory feedback while typing. This gives the switch a robust presence, perfect for those who appreciate the sound of a well-built mechanical keypress. On the other hand, the Durock Koala tactile switch offers a low-pitched and more neutral sound profile. The bass-heavy tone of the Koala switch contributes to a muted yet distinct auditory experience which provides a punchy keystroke without overwhelming noise. Overall, while both switches maintain pleasing acoustic characteristics, the 1989 leans more towards deep resonance, while the Koala provides a balanced tonal quality.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 is celebrated for its lightweight linear response, which promotes a fluid and uninterrupted keystroke. However, the exact subjective qualities are not mentioned here. In contrast, the Durock Koala tactile switch is characterized by a polished and accented feel, offering a smooth typing experience thanks to reduced friction. The stepped design of the Koala allows for a tactile bump that indicates actuation without the overwhelming force associated with hypertactile switches, striking a fine balance for both casual typing and gaming. The stiffness of the Koala adds another layer, requiring a bit more force to actuate, allowing for purposeful typing that some users might prefer.
In conclusion, if you seek a thocky and deep sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch stands out with its resonant qualities, while the Durock Koala tactile switch offers a balanced auditory experience with low-pitched tones. Feeling wise, the 1989 provides a smooth linear travel, although specific attributes enunciate a contrast with the Koala's polished yet stepped tactile response that delivers pronounced feedback without being overwhelming. The choice between these two switches will depend on your preference for sound and tactile feedback, as each caters to different typing styles and experiences, ensuring you can find enjoyment in either option based on your needs.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Koala tactile switch ultimately depends on your typing style and preferences. If you enjoy a gentle, smooth keystroke with a lower actuation force that emphasizes a thocky sound profile, the HMX 1989 may be the ideal switch for you. Its medium-light bottom out force of 53 grams makes it suitable for long typing sessions, offering a satisfying experience, particularly for gamers or those who prioritize rapid key presses without much resistance. Conversely, if you prefer a more pronounced tactile feel and don't mind a heavier actuation force, the Durock Koala, with its medium-heavy bottom out force of 67 grams, could be your top pick. Its stepped tactility provides a satisfying bump without being overwhelming, making it great for typists who appreciate a bit of feedback while typing. Additionally, the Koala’s low-pitched resonance and polished finish ensure a smooth yet engaging experience. Ultimately, by considering your needs for typing comfort, sound preference, and the tactile feedback you crave, you can easily determine which switch will better suit your keyboard setup.
Mentioned in this article
