HMX 1989 vs. HMX Lotus
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to enhancing your typing or gaming experience, the choice of mechanical keyboard switches plays a pivotal role, and both the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus offer distinct characteristics that cater to different preferences. The HMX 1989, known for its deep and thocky feel, is the go-to switch for those who appreciate a satisfying auditory and tactile response during their activities. This switch embodies the essence of the HMX Film switch series, making it ideal for users who thrive on a thumping sensation with each keystroke. On the other hand, the HMX Lotus brings a vibrant and lively touch to the table with its medium weight of 50g and a bright, resonant sound profile, evoking a super bouncy feeling that makes typing a charmingly delightful experience. For gamers and typists seeking a lively feedback and responsiveness, the Lotus can be the preferred choice. Both switches have their unique strengths that can enhance your overall keyboard experience, but let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus, the most notable difference lies in the top housing. The HMX 1989 utilizes a polycarbonate top housing while the Lotus features a nylon top housing. Polycarbonate is known for its rigid properties, which contribute to a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. This results not only in crisper audio feedback when keys are released, but also enhances the aesthetic appeal of the switch, especially when RGB lighting is involved due to its translucency. In contrast, the nylon top housing of the Lotus produces a deeper, fuller sound due to its softer nature, which absorbs more sound energy and leads to a more rounded acoustic experience. This fundamental distinction in materials will manifest in the auditory feedback and overall typing feel of each keyboard.
However, both models utilize nylon for their bottom housing, leading to a shared acoustic characteristic in that area. The nylon bottom housing in both the HMX 1989 and HMX Lotus evokes a deep, rich sound profile, benefiting from nylon's tendency to be a softer plastic that dampens noise. This means that the bottom-out sound and feel, which is significant during typing, will exhibit similarities between the two switches, regardless of the differing top materials. Hence, when typing on either switch, users can expect a consistent lower-end sound due to the shared nylon bottom housing, creating an inherent cohesiveness in the overall typing experience.
Overall, the contrasting top housing materials create a divergence in the sound profile during key release, while the identical nylon bottom housings ensure a unified auditory experience during the bottoming out phase of key presses. Users looking for a sharper, clearer sound may gravitate toward the HMX 1989 due to its polycarbonate top, whereas those who prefer a deeper, rounder typing sound might find the HMX Lotus more appealing because of its nylon top. Ultimately, these distinct yet complementary material choices reflect varying priorities in acoustic performance and aesthetic design, paving the way for individual keyboard preferences.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Lotus linear switch, both switches share the same actuation force of 45 grams, which contributes to a similar typing experience in terms of triggering keystrokes. However, they differ in bottom out forces, with the 1989 linear switch featuring a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Lotus has a slightly lower bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Lotus is the lighter of the two switches, making it conducive for longer typing sessions without causing as much fatigue. In contrast, the heavier bottom out force of the 1989 might appeal to users who prefer a more substantial push feel while typing. Ultimately, while both switches offer a consistent actuation force, the HMX Lotus provides a lighter overall experience, whereas the HMX 1989 caters to those who favor a firmer response.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Lotus linear switch have distinct travel distances that cater to different user preferences. The 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Lotus has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the 1989 offers a deeper feel when pressed, which some users may prefer for its satisfying tactile feedback. In contrast, the Lotus, with its 3.5 mm travel distance, provides a more responsive experience that can be advantageous for gamers or those who favor quick key presses. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on whether a user values the traditional deeper feel of the 1989 or the quicker, more direct action of the Lotus.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Lotus has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by its deep and thocky sound profile, which creates a satisfying auditory experience often favored by gamers and typists alike. This robust sound can contribute to an immersive typing experience, making each keystroke resonate pleasantly. On the other hand, the HMX Lotus switch produces a bright and resonant sound, offering a more lively auditory feedback that can uplift the typing experience. The contrast in sound profiles means that while both switches deliver a unique acoustic charm, the choice depends on whether one prefers a deeper thock or a sharper, more vibrant note.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 switch provides a solid, substantial keystroke that many users describe as satisfying and luxurious. Its dense feedback encourages confident typing with each press, making it an excellent choice for those who appreciate a more authoritative touch. Conversely, the HMX Lotus switch is designed to be super bouncy, with a medium weight of 50g at bottom-out. This dynamic tactile response can make typing feel almost effortless and is likely to enhance the joy of each key press. Thus, while both switches are linear and smooth, the 1989 leans toward a more robust and weighty sensation, whereas the Lotus offers a light and responsive experience.
Considering both switches, the HMX 1989 excels in delivering deep, thocky sounds and a substantial feel, making it an excellent choice for those who appreciate a more substantial typing experience. In contrast, the HMX Lotus switch shines with its bright sound and bouncy feel, catering to users seeking a more lively and lightweight typist delight. Ultimately, while they differ in subjective qualities, both switches provide a top-tier linear experience that can satisfy a range of preferences, so your choice will hinge on which auditory and tactile characteristics resonate more with you.
Conclusion
To conclude, when you're deciding between the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus linear switches, consider your personal preferences and typing experience. If you prefer a switch with a relatively medium-light bottom-out force that provides a deeper, thockier sound and feel—a true blend of solid feedback and satisfying acoustics—then the HMX 1989 is your best bet. Its unique characteristics make it well-suited for individuals who enjoy a comforting and slightly more pronounced piano-like depth, especially during gaming or heavy typing sessions. On the other hand, if you favor a lighter touch with a more lively, bouncy sensation, and if the sound profile of an inspiringly bright and resonant keystroke excites you, then the HMX Lotus switch will likely meet your needs better. This choice is ideal for those who value a swift and responsive feel that enhances their typing experience, making every keystroke a joy. Ultimately, both switches offer unique attributes tailored to different typing styles and preferences—your decision should align with how they resonate with your own tactile and auditory desires.
Mentioned in this article
