HMX Game1989 vs. HMX Lotus (Heavy)
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) present two compelling options, both of which fall into the linear category but offer distinct characteristics. The HMX 1989 switch is best known for its deep, thocky sound profile, making it a fantastic choice for gamers and typists alike who enjoy a resonant feedback on each keystroke, allowing for a satisfying experience during long sessions. On the other hand, the HMX Lotus (Heavy), with its medium-heavy actuation force of 62.5g, provides a super bouncy feel complemented by a bright, resonant sound, appealing to those who prefer an energetic typing experience. While both switches prioritize smooth keypresses without tactile bumps, your choice may hinge on whether you value the unique auditory experience of the 1989 or the lively responsiveness of the Lotus (Heavy). However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your preferences.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
62.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX Lotus (Heavy), notable differences arise in their top components. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its rigidity and translucence. This material contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, making it ideal for configurations that incorporate RGB lighting. The clear nature of polycarbonate not only enhances aesthetic appeal but also amplifies the sound when a key is released, allowing for a more resonant auditory experience. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) utilizes a nylon top housing, which tends to produce a deeper and fuller sound profile. This difference stems from nylon's softer composition, which absorbs sound more effectively than polycarbonate, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Thus, the choice of material for the top housing plays a pivotal role in the auditory characteristics of each switch, with the HMX 1989 leaning towards clarity and brightness while the Lotus embraces warmth and depth.
On a closer look at the bottom housings of both the HMX 1989 and Lotus (Heavy), we find a notable similarity: both switches employ nylon for their bottom housings. Nylon is celebrated for its sound-absorbing qualities, which lend a deeper and fuller sound profile to the switches. This shared material choice means that both models will deliver similar auditory experiences in terms of bottom-out sound and feel, as the softer plastic properties of nylon are conducive to a rounder sound. Therefore, while the top housings differ significantly in their acoustic profiles—polycarbonate emphasizing clarity and nylon enhancing fullness—the bottom housings ensure that the overall sound characteristic remains solidly anchored in the same fuller depth afforded by nylon.
In summary, the combination of the distinct top housing materials in the HMX 1989 and HMX Lotus (Heavy) leads to a varied sound experience when the keys are pressed and released. The polycarbonate top of the 1989 contributes to a bright and resonant sound upon release, while the nylon top of the Lotus (Heavy) offers a warmer, duller response. However, the consistency of nylon in both the bottom housings means that any user engagement with the switches will still evoke a similarly rich and deeper auditory foundation at the point of bottoming out. This interplay between the differing top materials and their matching bottom counterparts creates a nuanced typography of sound that bridges the gap between vibrancy and depth, allowing users to appreciate the distinct character of each model while still enjoying a shared tactile experience.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch, notable differences arise in both actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it more suitable for users who prefer effortless typing during extended work hours or long gaming sessions. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) requires a stronger actuation force of 55 grams and has a higher bottom out force of 62.5 grams, appealing to users who enjoy a more substantial push feel and tactile feedback while typing. While both switches offer unique advantages based on their actuation and bottom out forces, the 1989 is clearly the lighter option, ideal for those seeking a softer key feel, whereas the Lotus (Heavy) is designed for those who favor a firmer resistance. As the forces differ, users can expect distinct typing experiences with these switches, catering to their specific preferences.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch, there is a noticeable difference. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with traditional preferences for a deeper keypress, making it suitable for users who enjoy a more substantial feel when typing. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, catering to those seeking quicker response times, often favored in gaming scenarios. While both switches provide a linear experience, the 1989 lends itself to a more profound keystroke sensation, whereas the Lotus (Heavy) offers a snappier tactile feedback. Therefore, if you prioritize a heartier depth, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice, whereas if you lean toward responsiveness, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) might suit you better, given its shorter travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Lotus (Heavy) has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus (Heavy) for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The HMX 1989 linear switch offers a notably thocky sound that many enthusiasts appreciate, particularly when used with suitable keycaps and a well-paired keyboard casing. This depth of sound contributes to a rich acoustic experience that many gamers and typists find satisfying, especially for those who enjoy a more pronounced auditory feedback with each keystroke. On the other hand, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch produces a bright and resonant sound profile that contrasts with the deeper tone of the 1989. The Lotus switches deliver a more lively auditory feedback that adds a different character to typing or gaming sessions, enriching them with a distinct clarity.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 is characterized by a smooth and consistent travel, which appeals to users looking for a seamless typing experience. Its linear nature means there is no tactile bump, allowing for uninterrupted keystrokes that can enhance both speed and comfort. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) boasts a medium-heavy actuation force of 62.5g, which contributes to its super bouncy feel. This means that while each keystroke may require a little more effort to press down, it rewards the user with a satisfying responsiveness that can make typing feel both invigorating and enjoyable. The differing weights and bounce characteristics create unique tactile feedback, appealing to different user preferences.
In summary, both the HMX 1989 and Lotus (Heavy) linear switches have distinct sound and feel profiles that cater to diverse preferences in mechanical keyboards. The 1989 offers a deeper, thocky sound paired with a smooth linear feel, making it ideal for those who enjoy a rounded auditory experience and fluid keystrokes. Conversely, the Lotus (Heavy) provides a bright and resonant sound, coupled with a bouncy, medium-heavy feel that excites users seeking a more tactile and responsive typing experience. Ultimately, both switches present excellent options, and the choice between them will come down to personal preferences regarding sound and feel, ensuring that enthusiasts can find the perfect match for their desired typing environment.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch largely depends on your specific keyboard preferences and intended use. If you prefer a switch with a medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams that provides a satisfying thocky sound and feel, the 1989 is an excellent option. This switch is particularly suited for gaming or typing for extended sessions where comfort and responsiveness are paramount. On the other hand, if you gravitate towards a firmer typing experience with a heavier bottom-out force of 62.5 grams, the Lotus (Heavy) may be your go-to. Known for its bouncy feel and bright, resonant sound, this switch can enhance your typing experience, especially if you enjoy a weighted keystroke that delivers a tactile feedback with every press. Ultimately, consider your tactile preferences, sound preferences, and whether you’ll primarily be gaming or typing, as these factors will guide you toward the switch that best suits your style.
Mentioned in this article
