HMX Game1989 vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 stand out as two promising linear options, each with its own unique characteristics. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for delivering a deep and thocky sound profile, reminiscent of classic gaming experiences, making it an appealing choice for those who prioritize auditory feedback and a satisfying keystroke feel. Its construction emphasizes a substantial bottom-out experience that can enhance the gaming and typing experience for enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2, while lacking specific accolades, offers a smooth linear typing experience that appeals to users who favor consistency and minimal resistance in their keystrokes. With each switch catering to different preferences—whether it's the tactile enjoyment of the HMX 1989 or the seamless feel of the Lotus V2—potential buyers will want to weigh these factors carefully. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, it's essential to note that they utilize different top housing materials, which substantially affects the overall sound profile of each switch. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, known for its crisp and resonant sound due to its stiffer plastic composition. This material not only enhances the clarity of the sound but also allows for effective light diffusion when RGB lighting is employed, making it visually appealing. In contrast, the Lotus V2 utilizes POM (polyoxymethylene) for its top housing, which leads to a deeper, more muted sound profile. The use of POM minimizes higher frequencies, resulting in a more rounded auditory experience. This fundamental difference in top housing material indicates that while both switches aim to provide enjoyable sound qualities, their auditory signatures will vary—one will be sharper and clearer, while the other leans toward a softer, more subdued tone.
However, the bottom housing materials of both switches introduce some similarities in their sound profiles. The HMX 1989 incorporates nylon for its bottom housing, famed for producing a deeper and fuller sound. Its softer composition allows it to absorb sound more effectively, leading to a rounder audio experience when typing. The Lotus V2, on the other hand, utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housings, reinforcing the deeper and more muted sound signature that characterizes the Lotus V2. Despite the differences in top housing, the nylon bottom of the HMX 1989 and POM bottom of the Lotus V2 share a goal of enhancing the overall auditory experience during use. Both materials create a typing experience that feels solid and substantial, but the switch's auditory response will differ due to the contrasting materials used at the top.
The interplay of differing materials in the top and bottom housings highlights the nuanced sound that can emerge from switches with varying configurations. In the case of the HMX 1989, its polycarbonate top adds a sharper tone, while the softer nylon bottom tempers it, creating a balanced sound profile. Conversely, the Lotus V2 achieves uniformity with its POM housings, promoting a singular, deep sound throughout. Ultimately, while both switches deliver enjoyable auditory experiences, they do cater to different preferences, where the HMX 1989 leans toward clarity and brightness, and the Lotus V2 opts for depth and warmth. The distinction in materials also suggests that users can expect different tactile and acoustic sensations, influenced significantly by the respective housing choices.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch to the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, we find that both switches share the same actuation force of 45 grams. This equal actuation force means that users can expect a similar initial keystroke sensitivity when typing or gaming, making either switch suitable for those looking for a light touch in their typing experience. However, the significant difference arises in their bottom out forces; the HMX 1989 has a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the bottom out force for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 is unknown, leaving us without a direct comparison. As it stands, the 1989 is the heavier option overall due to its higher bottom out force, which might provide a more substantial feel for those who prefer a firmer typing experience. Thus, while both switches offer a light actuation feel, the 1989’s weightier bottom out could appeal to users looking for that extra resistance when typing extensively.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, the HMX 1989 stands out with a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Lotus V2 is slightly shorter at 3.4 mm. The 4 mm distance of the HMX 1989 aligns with the traditional switch specifications, providing users with a more substantial feel and depth during key presses. In contrast, the 3.4 mm travel of the Lotus V2 caters to those who prefer quicker response times, often favored by gamers looking for a more immediate tactile feedback. Ultimately, if you're seeking a more responsive experience, the Lotus V2 would be the better choice, whereas those who appreciate a deeper keypress may find the HMX 1989 more satisfying. Therefore, while both switches serve different preferences in feel and functionality, they distinctly showcase how travel distance can impact the typing or gaming experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deep and thocky sound signature, which provides a satisfying auditory feedback during typing. This makes it particularly enjoyable for those who appreciate a rich sound profile, enhancing the overall experience when gaming or typing. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch does not have a well-defined sound characterization available, leaving its acoustic qualities somewhat ambiguous. It’s important to remember that the actual sound produced by any switch can also be influenced by the keyboard's construction, choice of keycaps, and even the surface on which the keyboard is placed.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 offers a plush and smooth keystroke that contributes to a comfortable typing experience. The weight and resistance of the switch play a significant role in how it feels under the fingers, making it a top choice for long typing sessions or gaming marathons. Meanwhile, specific attributes of the feel of the Lotus V2 are not detailed, so it's difficult to make a direct comparison. However, in general, linear switches are typically known for their absence of tactile bumps, meaning that if the Lotus V2 is also a linear switch, you may experience a smoother feel similar to that of the 1989.
In conclusion, while the HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep, thocky sound and plush feel, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 lacks definitive descriptions in both categories, making it hard to fully gauge its qualities. If you're drawn to the 1989's acoustic profile and tactile sensation, you’ll likely enjoy a comparable experience if the Lotus V2 embodies typical linear characteristics, although the exact nuances remain uncertain. It's advisable to test both switches if possible to determine which one aligns best with your personal preferences in sound and feel.
Conclusion
To sum up, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences for typing feel and sound. If you prefer a switch that offers a medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams and is renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, the 1989 would be an excellent choice, especially for gaming and typing scenarios where tactile feedback and sound quality are important to you. On the other hand, if you seek a switch that is less established and doesn’t have defined specifications, the Lotus V2 may appeal to those who are curious to explore uncharted territory in keyboard switches, although you may find the lack of concrete performance metrics challenging for decision-making. Therefore, if you value reliability and established characteristics in your keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 should be your go-to option, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 might intrigue those looking for a unique experience despite its currently undefined qualities.
Mentioned in this article
