HMX Game1989 vs. KTT Mallo
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the KTT Mallo switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and KTT Mallo each offer unique experiences suited to different preferences and typing styles. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its impressive depth and pronounced thock, characteristic of linear switches that deliver a smooth keystroke without tactile bumps. This makes it an excellent choice for gamers and typists seeking swift, uninterrupted typing, as the absence of feedback allows for rapid key presses. In contrast, the KTT Mallo is a tactile switch that boasts a gentle and subtle feedback, providing just enough resistance to let typists know when a key has been actuated, which can enhance precision and typing comfort. Its medium-light feel and neutral sound signature make it versatile for various environments, appealing to those who enjoy a bit of tactile nuance without overwhelming auditory feedback. Both switches cater to different aspects of the typing experience: the HMX 1989 prioritizes speed and uninterrupted flow, while the KTT Mallo focuses on finesse and tactile satisfaction. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the KTT Mallo switches are strikingly similar, both featuring polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing. The use of polycarbonate in the top housing of both switches contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is largely due to polycarbonate's inherent stiffness, which allows for greater resonance and clarity in the acoustic output. Furthermore, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it an excellent choice for those who want to showcase RGB lighting, as it effectively diffuses light and enhances visual aesthetics, a quality both switches benefit from.
Conversely, the bottom housing of both switches is made from nylon, which presents a contrasting auditory experience compared to the polycarbonate top. Typing on switches that use nylon tends to yield a deeper, fuller sound profile because nylon absorbs more sound waves, resulting in a more muted and rounded acoustic characteristic. This distinction is critical, as the bottom housing primarily influences the bottom-out sound and feel when the key is pressed down. Thus, while both the HMX 1989 and the KTT Mallo use the same materials, they create different textures and acoustics when engaged in typing.
In summary, despite the identical materials employed in both the HMX 1989 and KTT Mallo—polycarbonate for enhanced brightness in the top housing and nylon for a more subdued tone in the bottom housing—the interaction of these materials yields a nuanced typing experience. The polycarbonate tops enhance clarity and brightness when releasing keys, while the nylon bottoms contribute a rounded and softened sound upon bottoming out. Therefore, although the switches share similar compositions, the synergy of their materials offers a uniquely layered auditory profile that benefits both functionality and design aesthetics.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, we see some interesting differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 features a known actuation force of 45 grams, while the Mallo switch has an unspecified actuation force but a bottom out force of 55 grams. The HMX 1989's bottom out force of 53 grams indicates that it requires slightly less force to fully engage compared to the Mallo's bottom out force, which exceeds the HMX 1989's actuation force by an increment. This makes the HMX 1989 the lighter of the two switches, as it allows for easier actuation and a more comfortable typing experience, particularly for those who type for extended periods or engage in long gaming sessions. Conversely, the KTT Mallo, with its higher bottom out force, may provide a more substantial and pronounced typing feel for users who prefer a heavier switch, though its actuation force remains unknown. Overall, while both switches fall into the medium-light category, the HMX 1989 stands out as the preferable option for those seeking lighter resistance, whereas the Mallo might appeal to those desiring a heavier tactile sensation.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch both have an identical travel distance of 4 mm. This similarity means that users can expect a comparable keypress feel and actuation depth when using either switch. With both switches requiring the same amount of distance to move from the top to the bottom, individuals may find that their typing experience is quite uniform, offering a consistent response across both types. Thus, whether one chooses the HMX 1989 or the KTT Mallo, the travel distance will provide similar results.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is best known for its deep and "thocky" acoustics, delivering a rich auditory experience that resonates during each keystroke. This characteristic is particularly appealing to users who enjoy a more pronounced audio feedback while typing or gaming, enhancing the overall engagement. In contrast, the KTT Mallo tactile switch boasts a neutral sound signature, which allows it to neither overpower nor fade away in busy environments. This means that while the Mallo produces a subdued sound when pressed, it's not entirely silent; it offers a balanced auditory profile that is fitting for both home and professional settings. The choice between the two will essentially depend on whether you prefer a more prominent auditory experience or a neutral sound that blends in seamlessly.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch excels in providing a smooth key press without any tactile bumps, resulting in a consistent, uninterrupted flow when typing. This linear characteristic is often favored for fast-paced gaming and productive typing sessions, as it accommodates quick repetitive actions. On the other hand, the KTT Mallo tactile switch exemplifies a gentle tactility that strikes a balance between being noticeable and not overwhelming. It features a feathery touch, requiring very little exertion, which greatly reduces finger fatigue during extended typing tasks. With its mild and subtle resistance, the Mallo allows users to feel a satisfying response while still ensuring a smooth experience without the agitating tactile feedback that can accompany some more pronounced switches.
In summary, the HMX 1989 linear switch and KTT Mallo tactile switch cater to different user preferences, particularly in sound and feel. The 1989 offers a rich auditory feedback ideal for those who enjoy a thocky sound, while the Mallo provides a more neutral, subdued auditory experience that adapts well to various environments. When it comes to feel, the 1989 delivers a smooth linear typing experience, perfect for fast typing and gaming, whereas the Mallo balances gentle tactility and a light actuation force, making it comfortable for long typing sessions. Ultimately, your choice between these switches will heavily depend on whether you prioritize sound resonance or a more moderated tactile experience while typing.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, consider your specific needs and preferences for typing and gaming. If you prioritize a deeper, thicker sound and feel that can enhance your immersive experience during gaming, the HMX 1989 is the way to go. Its medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams allows for quick, responsive keystrokes, making it ideal for fast-paced gaming environments. However, if you’re looking for a switch that provides subtle feedback with a balanced typing experience, the KTT Mallo would be your better option. With a slightly firmer feel at 55 grams, the Mallo offers a gentle tactility that is perfect for extended typing sessions, whether you're working or gaming. It excels in versatility due to its neutral sound signature and mild characteristics, making it suitable for quieter environments. Therefore, your choice should align with whether you value a pronounced thock and deeper sound or a more nuanced tactile feedback that blends seamlessly with your typing style.
Mentioned in this article
