United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Game1989 vs. Durock Mamba

An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Durock Mamba switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and Durock Mamba offer distinct experiences for typists and gamers alike, both categorized as linear switches. The HMX 1989 is well-regarded for its deep and thocky sound profile, making it an excellent choice for those who value a satisfying auditory feedback while typing. Its robust construction lends itself to a more pronounced tactile experience, perfect for users who enjoy the feel of a solid keystroke. On the other hand, the Durock Mamba pays homage to the late Kobe Bryant with its smooth typing sensation and polished sound, delivering a velvety experience that many find ideal for prolonged typing sessions. While the Mamba emphasizes a gliding motion and creamy auditory quality, the 1989 shines with its rich thock and depth. Ultimately, your choice may hinge on whether you prefer a tactile punch or a seamless glide. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

T5

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polymer nylon and UHMWPE blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

Extended long spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Durock Mamba, it becomes clear that both switches utilize distinct materials for their constructions, resulting in varied sound profiles. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This translucency not only enhances the acoustic properties of the switch but also allows RGB lighting to shine through effectively, thereby elevating the aesthetics of the keyboard. In contrast, the Durock Mamba employs a unique blend of polymer nylon and UHMWPE for its top housing, delivering a pleasant and slightly brighter sound profile that avoids the harshness often associated with sharper materials. While both switches aim for clarity in sound, the HMX 1989's approach is focused on producing a more resonant sound due to the rigidity of polycarbonate, while the Mamba balances sound with aesthetic design through its innovative polymer blend.

The bottom housing of the two switches also diverges significantly, contributing further to their unique sound characteristics. The HMX 1989 utilizes a nylon bottom housing, well-regarded for generating a deeper and fuller sound profile. This quality arises from nylon's softer nature, which absorbs sound more effectively, leading to a rounder sound when typing. On the other hand, the Durock Mamba features a POM bottom housing, which is lauded for producing a muted yet deeply satisfying sound. POM, being a more solid material, provides a different tactile feedback and auditory experience compared to the softer nylon. Regardless of their differences, both sets of bottom housing materials enhance typing experiences in a way that complements the top housing’s acoustics and overall performance.

Ultimately, both the HMX 1989 and the Durock Mamba offer distinct yet potentially complementary sound profiles stemming from their chosen materials. The combination of the stiffer polycarbonate top and softer nylon bottom in the 1989 cultivates a sharper upper frequency with a fuller base, while the Mamba's blend of polymer nylon and UHMWPE at the top paired with POM below creates a harmonious, muted experience overall. By splitting the qualities of sound and feel between the top and bottom housing, each switch offers users a unique experience. Despite their differences, enthusiasts can expect to achieve enjoyable and distinct auditory feedback from both switches, making them appealing choices for diverse typing preferences.

Weight

The actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Mamba linear switch present some distinct differences. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams, which is considered medium-light, whereas the actuation force for the Durock Mamba is unknown. However, the Mamba has a bottom out force of 60 grams, which is heavier compared to the HMX 1989's bottom out force of 53 grams. This means that while the HMX 1989 requires less force to actuate, resulting in a lighter feel that may be more comfortable for prolonged typing or gaming sessions, the Durock Mamba, with its heavier bottom out force, could provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer stronger feedback. Thus, for users seeking a lighter switch, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice, while those looking for a heftier feel may gravitate towards the Durock Mamba despite the unknown actuation force.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Mamba linear switch, significant differences emerge. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with traditional key switch designs, providing a deeper and more tactile experience. In contrast, the Durock Mamba has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, catering to those who prefer quicker response times typical in gaming scenarios. This reduced distance can enhance typing speed and responsiveness, appealing to gamers seeking competitive advantages. Ultimately, if you favor the more substantial feel of a switch, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice due to its longer travel distance, while the Durock Mamba may suit those who favor a more brisk, albeit potentially less tactile experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.

The Durock Mamba has an MSRP of $6.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mamba for $5.17.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by its thocky nature, producing a deep and rich auditory experience that is satisfying with every keystroke. This "thock" creates a distinct auditory feedback that can enhance the typing experience, making it engaging and pleasurable. The sound is reminiscent of a soft knock, resonating well and providing an immersive feel while typing. Conversely, the Durock Mamba switch offers a more neutral sound profile, suitable for various environments, as it strikes a balance between volume and clarity. While it possesses a thocky aspect as well, it may not be as pronounced as that of the 1989 switch, leading to a richer and creamier sound experience ideal for both typing and casual gaming.

When it comes to the feel, the HMX 1989 switch is noted for its deep and thocky touch, delivering a satisfying tactile journey that appeals to enthusiasts who enjoy a robust typing sensation. In contrast, the Mamba linear switch provides a mild and polished typing experience, characterized by a gentle touch that makes it accessible for typists of all skill levels. The smoothness associated with the Mamba, derived from its materials and factory lubing, allows for reduced friction and effortless key travel, enhancing comfort during long typing sessions. This polished feel can be especially appealing for users seeking a more refined experience without compromising the satisfaction that comes from a linear switch.

In conclusion, the HMX 1989 and Durock Mamba linear switches offer distinct auditory and tactile experiences that cater to different preferences. The 1989 switch excels in delivering a deeper, thocky sound along with a robust and engaging feel, making it perfect for those who appreciate a more pronounced feedback. Meanwhile, the Mamba switch provides a smoother, mild typing experience with a nuanced sound that is versatile for both work and leisure. While one may gravitate toward the immersive depth of the HMX 1989, others may find the comfort and polish of the Durock Mamba equally satisfying, leading to personal choices based on individual typing styles and environments.

Conclusion

To conclude, selecting between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Durock Mamba linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you favor a lighter touch and enjoy a sound profile that is both thocky and satisfying, the HMX 1989 may be the perfect fit for you. Its lower actuation force of 53 grams makes it ideal for those who appreciate a faster response time, making it a strong choice for gamers or individuals who prioritize quick typing. On the other hand, if you seek a more moderate actuation force along with a polished and mild typing experience, the Durock Mamba could be your go-to switch. The 60-gram bottom out force provides a solid tactile feedback while offering a rich auditory experience that is enjoyable for both work and casual typing. Ultimately, both switches are excellent choices, so consider your typing style, the sound and feel you prefer, and how you plan to use your keyboard before making a decision.

Mentioned in this article