United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Game1989 vs. KTT MoonRosa

An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the KTT MoonRosa switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and the KTT MoonRosa present two compelling options for enthusiasts seeking linear switches. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep, thocky sound profile, making it ideal for those who appreciate a tactile yet smooth keystroke that resonates with each press, elevating the gaming experience. In contrast, the KTT MoonRosa offers an exceptionally buttery smooth typing experience, thanks to its all-POM construction, along with a neutral sound signature that appeals to users who prefer a more understated auditory feedback while typing or gaming. Both switches cater to different preferences with the 1989 focusing on a robust, resonant feedback, whereas the MoonRosa emphasizes gentle, seamless keystrokes. Ultimately, understanding the nuances of each switch is crucial for making an informed choice; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

37g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

T5

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

22mm spring

Housing materials

When comparing the HMX 1989 and the KTT MoonRosa, the most striking difference lies in the materials used for their top housings. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, known for its stiffness and clarity, which contributes to a sound profile that is sharper and more resonant. This characteristic allows users to enjoy a crisp typing experience, especially when engaging with RGB lighting due to the polycarbonate’s translucency. On the other hand, the MoonRosa utilizes a POM top housing, which is associated with producing a sound profile that skews deeper and more muted. Thus, while the 1989 offers an elevated pitch and clarity, the MoonRosa emphasizes a warmer, softer auditory experience, giving each switch its unique character.

Contrasting the bottom housings reveals a somewhat similar approach, albeit through different materials. The HMX 1989 uses nylon for its bottom housing, which is celebrated for its softer texture that absorbs sound effectively, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This choice enhances the overall auditory experience by providing a rounded depth to the typing sounds. In comparison, the KTT MoonRosa's bottom housing is POM, a material that also contributes to a muted sound quality but in a distinct fashion. Both materials encourage a deeper sound signature, but nylon's softer nature may make the sound even more plush, while POM offers its own unique character. This similarity suggests that typists might achieve comparable auditory results in terms of depth and fullness, albeit through different means.

Ultimately, the combined effects of the top and bottom housing materials in each of these switches dictate their overall sound profiles. The sharper, crisper sound of the HMX 1989's polycarbonate top contrasts with the muted depth of the MoonRosa's POM top. However, the bottom housing plays a significant role in how these qualities manifest during use. For those interested in the impact of both the nylon and POM bottom housings, the HMX 1989 will produce a smooth, warm sound profile, while the MoonRosa's POM bottom will complement the muted top, offering a unique and enjoyable tactile experience. Thus, while the switches differ in their material compositions, they each provide distinct yet pleasing auditory results, inviting users to consider their preferences in sound when choosing between the two.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, significant differences in both actuation and bottom out forces are evident. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light option. In contrast, the MoonRosa offers a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. This makes the MoonRosa not only lighter in terms of actuation force but also in overall usage, as it requires less effort to trigger keystrokes and bottom out. Typists or gamers seeking a more effortless typing experience may prefer the lighter MoonRosa, while those desiring a more substantial feel might gravitate toward the heavier HMX 1989. The difference in bottom out forces further emphasizes this, where the MoonRosa bottoms out at 45 grams against the 1989's 53 grams. Thus, for those prioritizing a lighter switch for extended use, the MoonRosa is the better choice, whereas the HMX 1989 caters to those who appreciate a bit more resistance in their typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, a clear distinction emerges. The HMX 1989 boasts a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with the more traditional depth preferred by many users seeking a hearty typing experience. In contrast, the KTT MoonRosa has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, appealing to those who prioritize quicker response times, particularly gamers. This shorter distance can contribute to a more responsive feel, which some users may favor, although it may come across as too abrupt for others. Therefore, if you're inclined towards a more substantial key press, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice, while the KTT MoonRosa caters to those looking for speed and efficiency with its reduced travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.

The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch is highlighted by its deep and thocky tone, which creates a rich auditory experience that many enthusiasts find satisfying, especially in a gaming context. This sound characteristic contributes to a sense of immersion, effectively providing feedback upon each key press. In contrast, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch produces a low-pitched sound signature that is characterized as mellow and bass-heavy. This results in an overall neutral sound experience that allows for extended typing without being overly intrusive or distracting. When using different boards and keycaps, both switches will still maintain their distinct sound qualities, but the 1989 will likely stand out for those seeking a more pronounced acoustic experience.

In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 offers a distinct typing experience that is widely favored by gamers and typists alike for its deeper response. While specifics on its tactile qualities haven’t been provided, the general sentiment is that it provides a more engaging typing experience compared to many other options. On the other hand, the KTT MoonRosa is crafted for a milder tactile feedback, making it approachable for a wider audience. It specializes in a buttery smooth operation that simplifies the typing experience due to its easy-to-press nature. This gentle resistance minimizes finger fatigue during longer sessions, making the MoonRosa an excellent choice for users who value comfort and ease of use.

Overall, both the HMX 1989 and KTT MoonRosa switches have their unique attributes that cater to different preferences in sound and feel. While the 1989 emphasizes a deeper and more pronounced auditory feedback, the MoonRosa leans toward a smoother and neutral experience. In terms of typing comfort, the MoonRosa offers a gentle touch that is appealing for long typing sessions, whereas the 1989 likely provides a more engaging experience for those who enjoy a pronounced acoustic signature. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on whether one prioritizes sound depth or a buttery smoothness in their mechanical keyboard experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, consider your typing preferences and usage scenarios. If you enjoy a thocky sound and a more pronounced tactile experience, the HMX 1989 with its medium-light bottom out force of 53 grams is a compelling choice. It is particularly well-suited for gaming and scenarios where a deeper auditory profile enhances immersion. On the other hand, if you are looking for a smoother, quieter typing experience for long extended sessions, the KTT MoonRosa, with its lighter 45-gram resistance and all-POM construction, will likely serve you better. The MoonRosa’s low-pitched, mellow tone and easy-to-press feel make it an excellent option for office work or any situation where you want to minimize finger fatigue and noise. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on whether you prioritize a rich acoustic feedback and a more substantial keystroke feel with the HMX 1989, or prefer the gentle, soft touch of the MoonRosa for a seamless typing experience.

Mentioned in this article