United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Game1989 vs. Cherry MX Orange

An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Cherry MX Orange switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts often find themselves comparing options that vary not only in feel and performance but also in their heritage and design philosophy. Take, for example, the HMX 1989 and the Cherry MX Orange, both linear switches offering smooth keystrokes but distinct characteristics. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep and thocky sound profile, reminiscent of a classic gaming experience, while incorporating modern enhancements that cater to tactile feedback lovers. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Orange switches have a storied past, having been originally developed by Hirose and now reissued with enhancements to meet the modern gaming and typing demands. Both switches provide advantages—such as reduced finger fatigue and a quieter operation—making them appealing for long typing sessions or gaming marathons. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

55g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

T5

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the HMX 1989 to the Cherry MX Orange switches, a key distinction lies in the top housing materials utilized. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its stiffness. This rigidity leads to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile that stands out, particularly when illuminated by RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange employs a nylon top housing that contributes to a deeper, fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs sound more effectively, creating a duller and rounder auditory experience. Thus, while the HMX 1989 is designed to deliver a bright and resonant sound, the Cherry MX Orange prioritizes a more muted and warm acoustic output.

Despite the differences in their top housings, both switches utilize nylon in their bottom housings, which creates a unique sonic experience when typing. The HMX 1989's nylon bottom housing similarly fosters a deeper, more absorbent sound profile, aligning it with the characteristics found in the Cherry MX Orange. Both incorporate nylon, allowing them to share a consistent bottoming-out sound and feel. This shared material enhances the overall typing experience by providing a complimentary balance between the top and bottom housings. Therefore, while the top housings diverge in material and the resulting sound profiles, the bottom nylon housings create a commonality that connects the two switches.

The integration of different materials in the top and bottom housings illustrates how each component contributes to the overall perception and performance of a switch. The HMX 1989's polycarbonate top housing offers a crisp release sound, giving it a unique clarity when keys are released, while the nylon bottom housing provides a more bass-rich end to the keystroke. On the other hand, Cherry MX Orange’s nylon top housing further emphasizes the softness of the typing experience and its accompanying sound profile. Ultimately, the variances in sound are shaped by the interplay between these materials, demonstrating how switching one component can significantly alter the characteristics of a mechanical keyboard experience.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch with the Cherry MX Orange linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation forces. The HMX 1989 has a moderate actuation force of 45 grams, making it a lighter option that may be preferable for those engaged in prolonged typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange requires a heavier actuation force of 55 grams, appealing to users who prefer a more substantial typing experience. However, the bottom out force for the MX Orange is listed as "None," indicating that this information is unknown, while the HMX 1989 has a defined bottom out force of 53 grams. This means that while the HMX 1989 provides a consistent feedback loop with a measurable bottoming out sensation, the Cherry MX Orange's bottom out characteristics remain unclear. Ultimately, those who favor lighter switches for extended use may lean toward the HMX 1989, while users who appreciate a firmer push should consider the Cherry MX Orange.

Travel distance

Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm, meaning they will provide a similar tactile experience when pressed. Since both switches have identical travel distances, users can expect the same level of key response and feel when typing or gaming. This similarity can lead to comparable performance in both switches, making them suitable options for those who prefer a uniform key press distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.

The Cherry MX Orange has an MSRP of $4.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Orange for $3.89.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is best known for producing a deep, thocky sound profile that resonates well with typists and gamers alike. This characteristic provides a satisfying auditory feedback that enhances the overall typing experience. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange switch, while also leveraging a refined version of the original Cherry MX Orange, typically produces a more subdued sound signature. The reissued MX2A Orange switches aim for a balance between auditory satisfaction and noise levels, making them well-suited for office environments while still providing an engaging sound. However, it’s essential to remember that the actual sound produced can vary significantly based on the type of keyboard plate and keycaps used.

In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 switch offers a smooth keystroke that promotes effortless typing, accompanied by a pronounced tactile response which many users find pleasurable. This quality makes it appealing for both casual typists and serious gamers who thrive on precise feedback. Conversely, the Cherry MX Orange has been adjusted through its reissue to optimize the linear feel, focusing on a consistent and smooth actuation that appeals to users who prefer an uninterrupted keystroke. While both switches deliver a satisfying linear experience, the 1989 may cater more to those who enjoy a deeper feedback sensation compared to the refined, smooth experience of the MX Orange.

In summary, both the HMX 1989 and Cherry MX Orange switches provide unique qualities that may appeal to different users, especially in terms of sound and feel. The HMX 1989's characteristic thockiness offers an immersive experience particularly suited for those who appreciate a deeper auditory feedback, while the MX Orange’s more subdued sound is ideal for quieter environments. In terms of feel, the smooth action of both switches caters to users who prefer linear switches, though their tactile feedback differs slightly. Ultimately, you can achieve satisfying results with either switch, depending on your preferences and the overall keyboard setup you choose.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Cherry MX Orange switch, it’s essential to consider your preferences for tactile feedback, sound, and the type of activities you'll be engaging in. If you're looking for a switch that offers a medium-light resistance with a deep, thocky sound profile, the HMX 1989 would be an excellent choice, especially if you enjoy gaming or require a comfortable typing experience with a satisfying bottom-out feel. On the other hand, if you have a preference for a more subdued typing experience where sound is less of a concern, the Cherry MX Orange switch's enhancements from the MX2A generation may appeal to you, particularly if you value the nostalgic characteristics of the original MX Orange. Ultimately, your choice should reflect whether you prioritize a heavier, enriching sound and feel with the HMX 1989 or a more refined and potentially quieter experience with the Cherry MX Orange. So reflect on your needs, and select the switch that aligns best with your typing and gaming style.

Mentioned in this article