HMX Game1989 vs. Cherry MX Red
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Cherry MX Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and Cherry MX Red offer two compelling yet distinct options for users seeking a linear typing experience. The HMX 1989, part of the HMX Film switch series, is celebrated for its "thocky" sound and deep actuation, making it an appealing choice for gamers and typists alike who appreciate a rich auditory feedback without tactile bumps. In contrast, the Cherry MX Red is revered as a classic linear switch that combines a slightly heftier feel with a deeper sound profile, delivering a robust and responsive experience that many gamers and casual users find satisfying. While both switches provide a smooth actuation ideal for rapid key presses, the HMX 1989 boasts a unique auditory character that sets it apart, while the Cherry MX Red stands as a tried-and-true option with its own well-established reputation. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Cherry MX Red switches, several notable differences can be observed, particularly in the top housing. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is attributed to polycarbonate's rigidity, which allows for a clear and resonant sound when typing. In contrast, the Cherry MX Red is constructed with a nylon top housing that yields a deeper, fuller sound due to nylon's softer characteristics. This difference in materials leads to distinct auditory experiences, with the HMX 1989 providing a more pronounced sound clarity, ideal for users who prefer a more dynamic auditory feedback while typing, whereas the Cherry MX Red presents a warmer, more muted sound profile that may be more appealing to those who favor a quieter typing experience.
Both the HMX 1989 and the Cherry MX Red utilize nylon for their bottom housings, which lends a consistency to the deeper sound profiles produced by both switches. Since nylon is a softer plastic, it tends to absorb sound effectively, resulting in a duller, rounder sound when typing. This feature is significant in both switches, as it enhances the overall typing experience by providing a pleasant auditory feedback that can be described as rich and satisfying. Therefore, while the two switches differ in their top housing materials, the shared nylon bottom housing contributes similarly to the sound quality, ensuring that both switches maintain a depth and fullness in sound during operation.
In summary, the distinct choice of materials in the HMX 1989 and Cherry MX Red switches affects their overall auditory profiles during typing. The polycarbonate top of the HMX 1989 creates a brighter and more resonant sound, while the nylon top of the Cherry MX Red softens the auditory feedback, resulting in a warmer sound experience. However, the similarity of the nylon bottom housing means that users will experience a comparable depth of sound from both switches, despite the contrasting qualities of the top housings. This duality allows users to select their preferred switch based on the top housing's sound profile while still enjoying the harmonious depth provided by the nylon material in the bottom housing of both switches.
Weight
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch both feature an actuation force of 45 grams, making them comparable in terms of the force needed to trigger a keystroke. This shared actuation force indicates that users can expect a similar level of tactile response when typing or gaming with either switch. However, the bottom out force differs significantly; the HMX 1989 bottoms out at 53 grams, while the bottom out force for the Cherry MX Red is unknown. This means that the HMX 1989 has a heavier bottom out force compared to the Cherry MX Red, which could lead to a more pronounced feedback sensation when fully engaging the switch. Consequently, those who enjoy a lighter feel may favor the Cherry MX Red due to its unknown, potentially lower bottom out force, whereas users who appreciate a more substantial typing experience may prefer the slightly heavier HMX 1989. Overall, while both switches possess the same actuation force, the HMX 1989 is designed for those who prefer a bit more resistance once the key is fully pressed down.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch, both switches exhibit the same travel distance of 4 mm. This similarity means that users can expect comparable typing and gaming experiences in terms of keypress depth and feel. Since both switches share this exact measurement, the result is a consistent actuation and bottoming-out experience, making either switch a viable choice for those seeking a linear feel in their mechanical keyboards.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Cherry MX Red has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Red for $4.00.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch is known for its deep and thocky acoustics, making it one of the most resonant options in the HMX Film switch series. This contrasts nicely with the Cherry MX Red, which is also celebrated for its deeply satisfying sound. The MX Red produces a thocky sound that is rich and resonant, often described as a deep "thud" or gentle "knock" when the key is actuated and released. Both switches deliver a qualitatively similar auditory experience, where the low-pitched and bass-heavy tones contribute to a satisfying typing environment. However, it’s important to remember that the sound can vary depending on factors like the keyboard's construction and the choice of keycaps.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 switch's characteristics remain undefined, which could leave room for personal interpretation and variation among users. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Red is noted for exhibiting a textured feel. This means that although it’s a linear switch, it possesses a subtle friction that some users may find appealing while typing. The sensation of pressure when engaging the keys could offer a robustness to the typing experience but may not suit everyone’s preference for a smoother, more frictionless actuation. Without the specific feel details for the 1989, it’s challenging to draw a direct comparison in this area.
Overall, both the HMX 1989 and Cherry MX Red switches share similarities in sound with their rich, thocky profiles that deliver an enjoyable auditory response during use. While the feel of the HMX 1989 remains unspecified, the Cherry MX Red provides a textured experience that may appeal to those who enjoy a bit of resistance during key presses. For newcomers choosing between these options, both switches promise a satisfying experience in terms of sound, and while the feel may vary, enthusiasts generally find something to appreciate in each linear design.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch, your choice should hinge on personal preference and typographical needs. If you prefer a slightly lighter touch without sacrificing responsiveness, the HMX 1989 may be your ideal option. Known for its deep sound profile and a more tactile "thocky" sound, it caters well to those who enjoy a satisfying auditory feedback when typing or gaming. On the other hand, if you appreciate a more robust and slightly heftier feel, the Cherry MX Red could be the better choice for you. This classic switch combines a deeper tone and a textured experience that many users find engaging. Its heavier bottom-out force adds to the overall typing satisfaction, making it suitable for users who might favor a more defined tactile experience. In summary, consider the HMX 1989 for its medium-light feel and thocky acoustics, or opt for the Cherry MX Red for its deeper sound and enhanced weight, depending on your specific preferences in tactile feedback and auditory satisfaction.
Mentioned in this article
