HMX Game1989 vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and KTT Phalaenopsis offer distinct experiences suited for different typing preferences. The HMX 1989, known for its deep and thocky sound profile, provides a smooth linear experience that many gamers and typists appreciate for its uninterrupted key travel, making it ideal for rapid input without any tactile distractions. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis features a tactile bump at 50g, which not only enhances typing satisfaction but also helps reduce finger fatigue due to its lighter actuation force of 37g. This combination makes it an appealing choice for those who enjoy tactile feedback and a more engaged typing experience. While the 1989 caters to users looking for a silent and fluid operation, the Phalaenopsis is perfect for individuals who value a more pronounced response with each keystroke. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your unique typing style.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the KTT Phalaenopsis both utilize polycarbonate in their top housing, which impacts their sound profiles favorably. Polycarbonate is known for its clarity and resonance, contributing to a sharper, higher-pitched sound that many users find appealing. This characteristic is particularly valuable for those who enjoy a more pronounced keystroke when typing or gaming. Both switches benefit aesthetically from this material, as polycarbonate’s translucency allows for effective RGB lighting effects, enhancing the visual appeal of the keyboard. Since both models share this material for the top housing, users can expect a similar auditory experience due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which results in that crisp sound profile.
However, the bottom housing materials of the two switches contrast significantly. The HMX 1989 employs nylon, which results in a fuller and deeper sound profile due to its softer nature, allowing it to absorb more sound and create a more rounded auditory experience. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis features polycarbonate in the bottom housing as well, meaning it continues to project that sharper sound associated with a stiffer material. This difference plays a crucial role in how the switches perform; the 1989's nylon bottom housing lends a deep resonance when bottoming out, whereas the Phalaenopsis maintains its higher-pitched character throughout both the press and release phases.
Ultimately, the combination of these materials has implications for the overall typing experience. Users of the HMX 1989 will enjoy a distinctive sound due to the nylon bottom that contrasts with the brightness of the polycarbonate top. Conversely, those who choose the KTT Phalaenopsis will experience a more consistent high-pitched sound profile from both top and bottom housings being made of polycarbonate. Each switch's performance is a testament to how the differing bottom housing materials can create varied auditory experiences, illustrating the intricate balance that different materials bring to mechanical switches and how they influence typing feel and sound.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch to the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we can observe notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it the lighter option of the two. This distinction means that users who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions may favor the Phalaenopsis switch. Additionally, while both switches exhibit a close bottom out force, with the HMX 1989 being slightly higher, the overall experience differs, as the HMX offers a more substantial typing sensation due to its heavier actuation force. This contrast highlights that users looking for an easier keystroke may opt for the KTT Phalaenopsis, whereas those desiring a firmer push might gravitate towards the HMX 1989 for a more robust tactile response.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch both feature a travel distance of 4 mm, indicating that they offer the same keypress experience in terms of depth when pressed down. This consistency means that users will feel a similar amount of resistance and key engagement with both switches, leading to a comparable tactile response. Since neither switch is longer or shorter than the other in this aspect, users can expect uniform results when utilizing either the HMX 1989 or the KTT Phalaenopsis in their keyboard setups.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is known for its deep and thocky profile, producing a rich auditory experience as the keys are pressed. This sound can be described as a satisfying low-frequency thud that gives a sense of depth and quality, making it particularly pleasing in a gaming or typing scenario. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch also offers a unique sonic signature, characterized as bassy and thocky. The bassy quality lends a deeper richness to the sound when typing, while the thocky nature aligns closely with the HMX 1989's auditory profile, resulting in a similarly enjoyable sound experience overall. However, the final sound characteristics will depend on the keyboard build and keycap choices.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 does not have specific qualities noted, making it difficult to provide a direct comparison. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis features a stepped tactile feel that makes it distinct. This type of feedback allows typists to experience a clear, discernible tactile bump at the actuation point, which can enhance typing satisfaction. The 50g tactile force provides enough resistance to ensure that each keypress is both rewarding and comfortable, effectively minimizing finger fatigue during long typing sessions. Without the specific feel profiles for the HMX 1989, a direct comparison in this area remains elusive.
In conclusion, while both the HMX 1989 and KTT Phalaenopsis switches excel in delivering a rich sound experience characterized by deep and thocky qualities, the tactile feel of the Phalaenopsis offers a unique stepped tactile feedback that distinguishes it from the HMX 1989, which lacks detailed description in that aspect. If one prioritizes the auditory quality, they can expect similar results from both switches; however, for a well-rounded typing experience with precise tactile feedback, the KTT Phalaenopsis may be the more suitable choice.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch will largely depend on your typing preferences and intended use. If you enjoy a deeper, richer soundscape while typing and prefer a smoother keystroke without tactile feedback, the HMX 1989 would be an excellent fit for you. It's particularly suitable for gamers or those who appreciate a soft "thock" sound with its medium-light force of 53 grams, lending a satisfying yet controlled feel during fast-paced gaming or intense typing sessions. On the other hand, if you prioritize a lighter touch and enjoy distinct tactile feedback, the KTT Phalaenopsis is the way to go. With a bottom-out force of just 50 grams and a delightful tactile bump, these switches are ideal for prolonged typing sessions where minimizing finger fatigue is key. The "bassy" sound they generate, paired with the ergonomic stepped feel, ensures each keystroke is both engaging and comfortable. Ultimately, your decision should reflect what you value most in a switch—be it the subtle tactile nuances and light actuation of the Phalaenopsis or the rich auditory and fluid experience of the HMX 1989.
Mentioned in this article
