HMX 1989 vs. HMX Poro
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the HMX Poro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and HMX Poro linear switches each offer unique attributes that cater to different typing preferences and gaming styles. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep, thocky feedback, making it an excellent choice for users who crave a robust tactile sensation while typing. It's an ideal option for gamers and typists alike who appreciate a solid keystroke that can enhance their overall experience. On the other hand, the HMX Poro boasts silky smooth keystrokes and is meticulously lubricated to provide a seamless glide during use. With its ultra-light actuation force, the Poro offers a satisfyingly poppy and clacky sound profile, attracting users who prefer a lighter touch and a more responsive keypress. Both switches have their distinct advantages depending on one’s typing style and sound preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX Poro switches present an interesting study in contrasts, particularly in their top housings. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for enhancing sound clarity with its stiffer composition. This results in a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile that can be particularly advantageous when using RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the HMX Poro utilizes a nylon top housing, offering a softer composition that absorbs sound more effectively. Consequently, this leads to a deeper, rounder sound profile compared to the crisper tone produced by the polycarbonate material of the HMX 1989. As a result, the choice of top housing material plays a critical role in the auditory experience each switch provides, impacting users’ preferences based on sound characteristics.
When it comes to the bottom housing of both switches, however, the materials are similar as both utilize nylon. This classic switch housing material is celebrated for producing a fuller and deeper sound across both models. The nylon bottom housing absorbs sound more than stiffer plastics such as polycarbonate, contributing to a more muted and rounded auditory experience. Since both the HMX 1989 and the HMX Poro share this bottom housing material, they will likely provide similar sound profiles in terms of key presses and bottom-out sensations. This commonality in bottom housing helps create a consistent and familiar typing experience, regardless of the differences found in their top housings.
In combining the characteristics of each housing, user experience will vary depending on which aspect of the keystroke is being emphasized. The HMX 1989's polycarbonate top will deliver a clearer sound when releasing the key, while the nylon bottom ensures the deep and full sound remains consistent upon bottoming out. Conversely, the HMX Poro will present a rounder auditory profile throughout the entire keystroke due to the nylon top and bottom housings working synergistically. Understanding these differences allows users to select their preferred switch based on the desired sound and tactile feedback, ensuring satisfaction regardless of which model they choose.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, both exhibit the same actuation force of 45 grams, making them equally responsive in terms of keystroke activation. However, their bottom out forces differ slightly, with the 1989 registering at 53 grams while the Poro is lighter at 50 grams. This indicates that while both switches require the same initial force to register a keystroke, the Poro provides a slightly softer landing feel when bottoming out. Overall, the HMX 1989 can be considered the heavier option, given its higher bottom out force, which may appeal to users who prefer a more substantial typing experience. In contrast, the lighter feel of the HMX Poro, both in actuation and bottom out, might make it a better choice for those seeking comfort during extended typing sessions or gaming marathons.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, the HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Poro has a shorter travel distance of 3.7 mm. This makes the HMX Poro the shorter option, offering a more responsive feel that can be particularly appealing for gamers seeking quick response times. Conversely, the HMX 1989, with its longer travel distance, provides a deeper key press that some users might find more satisfying and less abrupt. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preference, with those favoring speed tending toward the HMX Poro and those who appreciate a more substantial feel gravitating towards the HMX 1989.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by a deep and thocky resonance, making it one of the most pronounced options in the HMX Film switch series. This rich sound adds an element of immersion during use, especially for gaming and typing sessions, where auditory feedback can enhance the overall experience. In contrast, the HMX Poro linear switch boasts a satisfying poppy and clacky sound profile, which is attributed to its ultra-light actuation force. This distinct auditory feedback provides a different auditory experience, appealing to users who appreciate a more lively sound with each keystroke. While both switches offer unique sound characteristics, factors such as the choice of keyboard and keycaps can significantly influence the resulting sound, so users might achieve different auditory experiences depending on their setup.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch is well-regarded for its deep and weighted feeling, providing a robust tactile response that many gamers and typists favor for a confident keystroke. This substantial feedback can be particularly satisfying during intense gaming sessions or prolonged typing tasks. Conversely, the HMX Poro linear switch is designed for an exceptionally smooth experience, featuring meticulous lubrication that allows for effortless gliding across the keypress. This silky sensation makes it a popular choice for those who prefer a lighter actuation force and seek a more comfortable typing experience. While both switches cater to distinct preferences, they provide experiences that are both enjoyable and tailored to different user needs.
In summary, the HMX 1989 linear switch is favored for its thocky sound and substantial feel, while the HMX Poro linear switch impresses with its poppy sound and silky smooth keystrokes. Each switch has its unique strengths, catering to various preferences in sound and tactile feedback. Whether you seek a deep auditory experience or a smooth glide, you’ll find that both switches can enhance your typing or gaming experience. The choice ultimately depends on your personal preferences and how you value sound and feel in your mechanical keyboard experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, choosing between the HMX 1989 and the HMX Poro linear switches ultimately depends on your personal preferences and how you plan to use your keyboard. If you enjoy a slightly heavier feel and appreciate a switch that delivers a deeper, thockier sound signature, the 1989 could be your go-to option. Its medium-light bottom-out force of 53 grams provides a satisfying tactile experience that many gamers and typists find appealing, especially for those long gaming sessions or writing marathons. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch and value a smooth and effortless keystroke, the HMX Poro is an excellent choice. Weighing in with a bottom-out force of just 50 grams, this switch offers an ultra-light actuation that makes typing feel seamless, while its lubricated design ensures minimal friction. Particularly, if you enjoy a more poppy and clacky sound profile, the Poro will enhance your typing experience with its delightful auditory feedback. In conclusion, both switches cater to different preferences; consider your style of use—whether it's for gaming, typing, or a mix of both—to decide which linear switch best suits your needs.
Mentioned in this article
