United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Game1989 vs. Jerrzi Poseidon

An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Jerrzi Poseidon switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Poseidon offer unique features that cater to different user preferences, despite both being linear switches. The HMX 1989 is renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, delivering a satisfying auditory feedback that enhances the gaming experience and makes it a favorite among enthusiasts who appreciate rich acoustic feedback while typing. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Poseidon, while lacking a specific standout characteristic, is designed to provide smooth keystrokes ideal for fast-paced gaming and efficient typing without any tactile bumps or noise. Both switches have their merits, with the HMX 1989 appealing to users who value sound and feel, while the Poseidon attracts those prioritizing a more straightforward typing experience. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.60 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Box

Stem material

T5

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

stainless steel

Housing materials

The comparison between the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Poseidon reveals intriguing differences and similarities that influence their overall sound profiles and tactile experiences. The HMX 1989 uses a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for providing a sharper and more resonant sound. The benefits of polycarbonate include its rigidity and translucency, making it particularly advantageous for keyboards that utilize RGB lighting. Energetic vibrations escape more freely from this stiffer material, contributing to a crisper auditory experience. In contrast, the Poseidon features a polyoxymethylene (POM) top housing, which although shares some similarities with polycarbonate in terms of precision and aesthetic potential, actually produces a much deeper and more muted sound. This softening effect results from POM’s different acoustic properties, leading to a sound profile that is pleasing and distinct, albeit less bright than that of the 1989.

On the bottom housing front, the HMX 1989 employs a nylon material, a long-standing favorite in switch construction that complements its top housing by delivering a deeper, fuller sound. The softness of nylon contributes to its capability to absorb sound, thereby enhancing the duller, rounder audio experience, particularly when the switches bottom out. In comparison, the Poseidon utilizes POM for its bottom housing as well, which also lends itself to a deeper sound but is described as unique in its own right. While both switches have deeper sound profiles, the Poseidon's combination of POM for both top and bottom housings creates a more uniform auditory quality. Consequently, this leads to a notably distinct yet cohesive sound character compared to the varied sound contributions from the 1989's contrasting nylon bottom housing.

When evaluating the interaction between these materials, one understands that both switches can offer a rich sound experience, albeit with varied characteristics due to their construction. The HMX 1989's duality of materials introduces an interesting split, where the sharper resonance of the polycarbonate top housing contrasts with the muted, fuller sounds of the nylon bottom housing, resulting in a unique auditory signature. Conversely, the Jerrzi Poseidon manifests a relatively uniform sound experience, as both housing materials work together harmoniously to produce a singular deep sound profile. Therefore, while the 1989 presents a layered sound experience through its disparate materials, the Poseidon's synergy—thanks to its POM construction—allows for a unique yet cohesive auditory and tactile experience.

Weight

The HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch present a comparison of actuation forces that highlights their distinct characteristics. The HMX 1989 requires an actuation force of 45 grams, while the Poseidon has a slightly lighter actuation force of 40 grams. This suggests that users who prefer a lighter touch may favor the Poseidon for longer typing sessions, as the lower actuation force can reduce fatigue. On the other hand, the HMX 1989’s higher force may appeal to those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience, providing a bit more resistance that some typists and gamers might appreciate. When it comes to bottom out forces, the HMX 1989 has a bottom out force of 53 grams, which contributes to a defined tactile feel when keys are fully pressed. In contrast, the Poseidon lacks a specified bottom out force, making it difficult to compare this aspect directly. Overall, while both switches cater to different preferences—lighter for extended use and heavier for feedback—the HMX 1989 can be described as the heavier option due to its higher actuation and bottom out force, while the Poseidon stands as the lighter choice albeit with an unknown bottom out force.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch, we find that the HMX 1989 has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Jerrzi Poseidon measures a shorter 3.4 mm. This difference highlights a key contrast in the design intentions behind these switches. The longer 4 mm distance of the HMX 1989 aligns with traditional preferences, offering a more substantial feel and a greater actuation depth that some users might favor for its tactile feedback. On the other hand, the 3.4 mm travel distance of the Poseidon caters to a more modern approach, appealing particularly to gamers who prioritize responsiveness and quick actuation over the more pronounced depth. Therefore, if you lean towards a switch that provides a deeper keystroke experience, the HMX 1989 would be the better choice; conversely, if you seek quicker response times and a more immediate feedback, the Jerrzi Poseidon is ideal with its shorter travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.

The Jerrzi Poseidon has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poseidon for $3.59.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is best known for its deep, thocky acoustics, which provide a satisfying auditory experience during typing or gaming sessions. This characteristic enhances the overall feel of the switch and can contribute to a more immersive atmosphere. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch lacks any specific known sound qualities, making it challenging to directly compare its auditory performance with the 1989. However, the sound output of any switch can vary significantly based on other factors such as the choice of keyboard, materials, and keycaps utilized.

When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 is revered for its smooth and consistent keystroke, providing a reliable tactile experience that many users appreciate during both typing and gaming. The switch is designed to maximize comfort and responsiveness, making it an ideal choice for extended use. In contrast, the Jerrzi Poseidon does not have specific feel characteristics documented, leaving its tactile response largely unknown. As such, the 1989 is likely to offer a more predictable and satisfying sensation under the fingers, while the Poseidon remains a mystery in this area.

In summary, the HMX 1989 linear switch stands out with its thocky sound and smooth feel, appealing to those who prioritize auditory and tactile feedback in their typing experience. In contrast, the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch doesn't have defined sound or feel attributes available for comparison, making it harder to evaluate its overall performance. If you're looking for a switch with a well-established reputation for sound and feel, the 1989 is the clear choice; however, if you’re interested in exploring the Poseidon, you may still uncover a satisfactory experience, though it remains to be seen how it stacks up against the 1989.

Conclusion

To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and specific use cases. If you appreciate a tactile and satisfying typing experience with a medium-light feel, the HMX 1989 switch, characterized by its thocky sound and deeper actuation, is an excellent choice for both gaming and typing. Its 53 grams bottom-out force strikes a balance that can appeal to those who enjoy a bit of resistance without straining their fingers. On the other hand, while details about the Jerrzi Poseidon are scarce, if you’re in search of an innovative switch with unique characteristics—especially if you prioritize sound or feel that isn't overtly documented—you might want to explore that option further. If you're looking for a well-documented and reliable choice, the HMX 1989 is likely the better fit. Ultimately, your decision should align with how you intend to use your keyboard, whether for competitive gaming, casual typing, or a blend of both.

Mentioned in this article