HMX 1989 vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switches can significantly enhance your typing experience, and two prominent options to consider are the HMX 1989, a linear switch, and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring, a tactile switch. The HMX 1989 is known for its deep, thocky sound profile, often described as the most robust of the HMX Film switch series, making it an appealing choice for gamers and typists who appreciate smooth, uninterrupted keystrokes without any tactile feedback. In contrast, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring excels with its medium-high tactility, providing satisfying feedback during typing sessions. This switch features a long, two-staged spring that delivers not only a pronounced tactile bump but also deep, resonating thocks, catering to those who enjoy a more responsive feel while typing. Both switches offer unique auditory and tactile experiences that can influence your workflow and gaming performance. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
63g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20mm dual-stage spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring switches share a commonality in their top housing, both utilizing polycarbonate material. This choice in housing results in a sound profile characterized by a sharp, higher-pitched, and crisp auditory experience. Polycarbonate, being a stiffer plastic, enhances resonance, making it ideal for producing clearer sounds compared to softer alternatives. Additionally, both switches benefit from the aesthetic appeal of translucent polycarbonate, which is particularly advantageous for RGB lighting applications. Users will notice similar sound characteristics emanating from both switches upon pressing, thanks to the consistent top housing material.
In contrast, the bottom housing materials diverge significantly between the two switches. The HMX 1989 employs nylon for its bottom housing, a material known for its softer properties that generate a deeper and fuller sound profile. This absorbs more sound, leading to a more muted and rounded auditory effect when compared to the bottom housing of the Shadow (Ink), which also uses polycarbonate. The use of polycarbonate for the bottom housing in the Shadow (Ink) reinforces the sharper and more resonant sound profile typical of this material. The difference in bottom housing materials means that the typing experience will feel distinct when bottoming out; thus, while the top housing contributes to the initial sound on release, the bottom housing shapes the feeling and sound experienced when the key is fully pressed down.
Ultimately, the differing materials in the bottom housings of the HMX 1989 and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) lead to a unique typing experience with varied sound profiles. Those seeking a full and mellow sound will likely prefer the nylon bottom of the 1989, while users desiring a sharper and more resonant experience might gravitate towards the Shadow (Ink) with its dual polycarbonate housing. This demonstrates how even though both switches share a similar top housing material, the diverse bottom housings create contrasting characteristics, influencing the overall sound and feel when typing. As a result, each switch offers a distinct experience while potentially satisfying different user preferences.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch, notable differences emerge in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 linear switch features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring has a heavier actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom out force of 63 grams, positioning it as a medium-weight option. This means that the HMX 1989 is the lighter switch, making it potentially more comfortable for extended typing sessions, whereas the Aflion Shadow offers a more substantial feel, which may appeal to users seeking a firmer push on each keystroke. Overall, users looking for a lighter switch for ease during prolonged use may prefer the HMX 1989, while those valuing a heavier and sturdier typing experience might gravitate towards the Shadow (Ink).
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch both feature a travel distance of 4 mm, which means they share the same keypress feel in terms of the distance traveled when pressed. This identical travel distance allows users to experience a similar tactile feedback and actuation depth when typing or gaming. As a result, regardless of your preference for linear or tactile switches, both options will provide a comparable experience in terms of key travel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring for $3.57.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When comparing the sound profiles of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch, distinct qualities emerge. The 1989 is best known for an exceptionally deep and thocky sound that resonates with a rich, bassy thump, making it ideal for those who appreciate acoustics with a heavy, satisfying punch. In contrast, the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring provides a clacky and sharp auditory experience characterized by a high-pitched crispness that can feel bright and percussive. It is important to note that the overall sound produced by any switch is influenced by the keyboard's construction and materials, as well as the choice of keycaps, which means users of either switch can potentially achieve pleasing results based on their overall setup.
When it comes to feel, the two switches present different tactile experiences. The HMX 1989, while not explicitly described in the provided information, is likely to be smooth and linear, offering a direct keystroke with a consistent feel through the entire keypress. In contrast, the Shadow (Ink) Double Spring offers a multifaceted tactile response. Its sharp tactile bump is pronounced, delivering a strong feedback sensation that can be felt distinctly with each keypress. Additionally, its dual-staged spring design contributes to a snappy and bouncy feel, enhancing responsiveness and creating a lively typing experience. The tactile qualities of the Shadow make it exceptionally engaging, while the lack of specific details on the 1989's feel suggests it may be more muted in comparison.
In conclusion, the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch cater to different preferences among keyboard enthusiasts. The 1989 excels in producing deep, thocky sounds that resonate significantly, while the Shadow (Ink) offers a sharp, clack-like auditory experience. In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 likely maintains a smooth linearity, whereas the Shadow incorporates a pronounced tactile feedback with its sharp bump and responsive nature. Together, these switches provide varied yet satisfying tactile and auditory experiences, enabling users to select a switch that aligns with their typing style and preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, choosing between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring tactile switch ultimately depends on your individual preferences and typing needs. If you prefer a smooth typing experience with a medium-light actuation force, the HMX 1989 is an excellent choice, especially if you enjoy a deep, thocky sound that adds to the auditory satisfaction of your keystrokes. This switch is ideal for gaming or general typing, where a fluid motion can enhance your experience. On the other hand, if you’re inclined towards tactile feedback and enjoy a more pronounced tactile bump with medium resistance, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Double Spring is perfect for you. Its sharp and snappy feedback, combined with the satisfying clacky sound, makes it an excellent option for typing enthusiasts who appreciate strong feedback and a lively feel in each keystroke. Ultimately, your choice should resonate not only with how you handle your keyboard during various tasks but also with the auditory and tactile satisfaction you seek in your typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
