HMX Game1989 vs. HMX Swift
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the HMX Swift switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and HMX Swift offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The HMX 1989, celebrated for its deep, thocky sound, is the epitome of tactile feedback and sturdy construction, making it an excellent choice for gamers who thrive on a robust auditory experience during their sessions. In contrast, the HMX Swift boasts a smoother keystroke thanks to its full nylon housings, producing a deeper sound profile that deviates from the brand's typically brighter signature. With a lighter 42g actuation force, the Swift appeals to typists seeking a comfortable and effortless experience, characterized by its feathery and bouncy feel. Both switches present compelling options depending on your desired typing sensation and sound preference; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.90 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm extended spring
Housing materials
When comparing the HMX 1989 and the HMX Swift, the housing materials reveal significant differences that directly influence the auditory and tactile experience of each switch. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for creating a sharper and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer plastic composition. This translucency allows for optimal RGB lighting effects, enhancing the aesthetic appeal of the switch. In contrast, the HMX Swift uses a nylon top housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs sound more effectively than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder auditory experience. The material choice for the top housing thus distinctly shapes how the switches perform in terms of sound when releasing the keys.
Despite the differences in top housing materials, both the HMX 1989 and HMX Swift feature nylon bottom housings. This uniformity means that both switches will deliver a consistent sound experience regarding the bottom-out sound and feel, as the properties of nylon contribute to a similar depth and fullness. Since the nylon bottom possesses softer characteristics, it effectively rebounds when pressed, producing a rounded sound that remains constant across both models. This consistency in the bottom housing allows for an enduring familiarity in tactile feedback, regardless of the differences in the top housing.
Ultimately, if one desires the auditory characteristics of the HMX 1989's crisp sound combined with the HMX Swift’s warmer tones, the interaction between the two housing types offers a chance to blend both experiences. The sharpness of the polycarbonate top in the 1989 keeps the overall feel lively, while the nylon bottom remains the great equalizer, providing rich resonance in both switches. For users, this means they can appreciate the distinctive characteristics of each switch, whether it's via the more vibrant auditory feedback from the HMX 1989 or the smoother acoustics of the HMX Swift while still enjoying the consistent tonal depth granted by the nylon bottom housing across both models.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, we can see key differences that cater to varying user preferences. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, characterizing it as a medium-light switch. In contrast, the HMX Swift is lighter, featuring an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, which falls into the light category. This means that users who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing sessions or gaming may find the Swift more appealing, while those who favor a firmer feel in their keystrokes might opt for the 1989. Therefore, the Swift is the lighter option, while the 1989 is the heavier one, giving users distinct choices based on their typing preferences. Given these differences, while both switches have a relatively close actuation force, the differences in their overall bottom-out forces suggest that users may experience slightly varied feedback, enhancing their typing experience according to their desired tactile response.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, it is clear that the two options cater to different preferences. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, making it the longer option and potentially providing a more substantial feel during operation. In contrast, the HMX Swift has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.9 mm. While the difference may seem minimal, it could affect user experience, especially for those who prioritize a faster response time. Gamers, for instance, often lean towards the shorter travel distance of the Swift for quick actuation, whereas those who appreciate a fuller tactile experience may prefer the deeper travel of the 1989. Thus, the choice between these two switches depends largely on individual preferences for responsiveness versus depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Swift has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Swift for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is known for its deep and thocky profile, making it one of the quieter yet rich-sounding options in the HMX Film switch series. This quality can create a satisfying auditory environment, especially for those who appreciate a more muted yet impactful sound. In contrast, the HMX Swift linear switch is characterized by its clacky sound. With a sharper, snappy tone, it produces a crisper and brighter auditory feedback than the 1989. This difference in sound profile means that while both switches can provide a pleasing audio experience, the 1989 is more focused on depth and warmth, whereas the Swift offers a more pronounced and percussive sound.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 switch has not been explicitly described, making it challenging to provide a direct comparison. However, the HMX Swift stands out with its easy-to-press action, involving gentle resistance that requires minimal force. This quality makes it particularly comfortable for extended typing sessions, as it reduces finger fatigue. The Swift's light actuation force enhances the experience with a feathery touch, making every keystroke feel effortless. Additionally, users will enjoy the bouncy feedback that comes from the switch, and the creamy sensation provides a smooth typing experience that's akin to gliding across the keys. The blend of these attributes in the Swift makes it a highly enjoyable switch for both gaming and typing.
In conclusion, if you're deciding between the HMX 1989 and the HMX Swift linear switches, you'll find two distinct experiences. The 1989 is ideal for those who appreciate a deep, thocky sound profile, while the Swift offers a clacky sound that lends itself to a brighter auditory experience. Although the feel of the 1989 remains unspecified, the Swift clearly excels with its lightweight, spacious, and effortless typing characteristics. If you prioritize sound, the decision will hinge on whether you prefer the deepness of the 1989 or the sharpness of the Swift. On the other hand, if feel is your main concern, the Swift's extensive qualities in this area set a high standard. Ultimately, both switches can deliver enjoyable typing experiences, but they cater to different preferences in sound and touch.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch should hinge on your typing preferences and intended use. If you value a deeper, more resonant sound profile along with a thocky feel, the HMX 1989 is your go-to switch, especially if you enjoy a medium-light resistance that allows for a satisfying bottom-out experience at 53 grams. This can be particularly advantageous for gaming sessions where you want to hear and feel each keystroke distinctly. On the other hand, if you prioritize a feather-light typing experience with minimal resistance, the HMX Swift switch stands out with its 50-gram actuation force and clacky sound profile. These switches are exceptionally easy to press, making them ideal for extended typing or gaming sessions where comfort and responsiveness are key. With their bouncy and creamy feel, the Swifts provide a gentle yet engaging typing experience. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your personal typing style and any specific tasks you're aiming to enhance—whether you prefer a deeper thock or a more feathery, smooth stroke, both switches offer unique benefits tailored to different user experiences.
Mentioned in this article
