HMX Game1989 vs. Bsun Tomcat

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and the Bsun Tomcat stand out as two noteworthy linear options, each boasting unique characteristics that cater to different user preferences. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep, thocky sound profile, making it an excellent choice for gamers and typists who appreciate a solid auditory feedback without the clicky noise, which can enhance the satisfaction of keystrokes. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat features Ly stems that create an exceptionally smooth typing experience, appealing to those who prioritize fluidity in their tactile interaction. Both switches offer their own resonant sound profiles, contributing to the overall typing experience in distinct ways. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX Game1989 Linear

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

Both the HMX 1989 and Bsun Tomcat switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, yielding similar acoustic characteristics. As a comparatively stiffer plastic, polycarbonate contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, ensuring a clear and resonant auditory experience when the switches are activated. The translucency of polycarbonate not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the switches, making them particularly effective for setups featuring RGB lighting, but it also reinforces the sound clarity, which is essential for users who prioritize both function and style in their keyboard setups. As a result of this shared material choice, users of both switches can expect an enhanced lighting effect alongside a crisp sound signature, making them an apt choice for customizable keyboard enthusiasts.

Conversely, the bottom housing of both switches is made from nylon, which introduces a marked contrast in sound quality that complements the polycarbonate tops. Nylon is traditionally recognized for its ability to absorb sound, resulting in a deeper, fuller sound profile. This characteristic leads to a softer auditory experience compared to the high-pitched clarity facilitated by the polycarbonate housing. Since the bottom housing primarily influences the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed, both the HMX 1989 and Bsun Tomcat should ideally deliver a satisfying thocky sound that many users enjoy, although it inherently differs from the sharper note produced by the top housing.

In summation, while both the HMX 1989 and the Bsun Tomcat incorporate common materials in their designs, they intricately balance sound profiles by combining the clear tones of polycarbonate tops with the muted yet rich tones of nylon bottoms. This design philosophy allows each switch to leverage the strengths of both materials—creating an overall auditory experience that can be tailored according to user preference. Ultimately, whether someone opts for the HMX 1989 or the Bsun Tomcat, they will benefit from a versatile sound profile that merges the crisper highs of polycarbonate with the deeper resonance of nylon.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, we see noteworthy similarities and slight differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. Both switches feature an actuation force of 45 grams, allowing for a comparable typing experience in terms of keystroke activation, which is beneficial for lengthy typing or gaming sessions. However, the Tomcat has a marginally higher bottom out force of 54 grams compared to the 1989's 53 grams. This means that while both switches feel medium-light when actuated, the Tomcat switch provides a slightly firmer ending feel upon bottoming out. Consequently, those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Tomcat due to its heavier bottom out force. Thus, while the actuation forces are identical, the difference in bottom out forces will create a subtle contrast in user experience between the two switches.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, the HMX 1989 offers a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Tomcat features a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. This difference of 0.4 mm makes the 1989 a better choice for those who appreciate a more pronounced key press, providing a more substantial feel when typing. In contrast, the Tomcat's shorter travel distance could appeal to gamers or users who favor quicker response times, allowing for rapid actuation during gameplay or fast typing. In summary, if you prefer a more traditional feel and depth in your keypress, the HMX 1989 is the preferable option, whereas the Bsun Tomcat is suited for those seeking a faster and more responsive experience.

Price comparison

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by a deep and thocky profile, which can create a satisfying audio experience while typing or gaming. This resonance adds a level of richness that many enthusiasts find appealing, making each keystroke feel impactful. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch is noted for its resonant sound profile, which is achieved thanks to its unique design. This resonance may result in a smoother, less jarring auditory phenomenon compared to some more typical linear switches, enhancing overall typing enjoyment. It's worth noting, however, that sound can vary significantly depending on the keyboard build and keycap material you pair with these switches.

When evaluating the feel, the HMX 1989 offers a plush tactile response that emphasizes its thocky character, making it pleasant for prolonged use in typing or gaming scenarios. This tactile quality can help in providing a feedback loop that users appreciate. The Bsun Tomcat, featuring Ly stems, is designed for an exceptionally smooth typing experience, which may appeal particularly to those who prioritize effortless keystrokes. The smoothness of the Tomcat can lead to minimal resistance and friction, enhancing the overall fluidity of typing. While both switches deliver distinct experiences, the 1989 prioritizes a thicker response, while the Tomcat emphasizes a buttery smooth action.

Overall, both the HMX 1989 and Bsun Tomcat linear switches provide unique auditory and tactile experiences that cater to different preferences. The 1989 excels in delivering a thocky sound and plush feel that many enthusiasts cherish, while the Tomcat stands out with its smooth action and resonant audio profile. Depending on your personal preferences, you can find enjoyment and satisfaction in either switch, whether you lean towards a deeper, thocky sound or a silky-smooth typing experience.

Conclusion

To conclude, when choosing between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences in sound and feel. If you find yourself drawn to switches that offer a deep and thocky sound profile, along with a more pronounced tactile feel while maintaining a medium-light actuation force, the HMX 1989 would be the ideal choice for your setup. This switch excels in providing a satisfying auditory experience and a fuller bottoming out sensation, which is particularly enjoyable for gamers and typists who appreciate a more substantial feedback upon keypress. Conversely, if you prefer an exceptionally smooth typing experience and a more resonant sound characteristic, the Bsun Tomcat would likely be your best bet. It’s perfect for those who value glide and fluidity in their key presses, making it well-suited for extensive typing sessions or gaming marathons where speed and response are paramount. Therefore, when selecting your switch, consider which aspects you prioritize more: the depth and thockiness of the 1989 or the smoothness and resonance of the Tomcat. Each switch offers a unique experience tailored to different typing styles and sound preferences.

Mentioned in this article

HMX Game1989 Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$2.99 per 10

Learn more