HMX Game1989 vs. Bsun Tuzi (Bunny)
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, both the HMX 1989 and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switches stand out for their unique characteristics and typing experiences. The HMX 1989 is celebrated for its deep and thocky sound profile, making it a favorite among gamers and typists who appreciate a pronounced acoustic feedback and a solid feel. In contrast, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) offers a more refined typing experience, featuring a modified LY stem that combines a smooth touch with a satisfying clack, thanks to its PC top and PA bottom construction, which delivers a high-pitched and silky sensation upon keystroke. While the HMX 1989 caters to those who revel in a robust auditory experience, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) appeals to users seeking a balance of smoothness and pleasant sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
42g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) both feature polycarbonate in their top housings, allowing for similar acoustic properties. The polycarbonate material contributes to a bright, crisp sound profile characterized by its rigidity and translucency. This stiffer plastic quality aids in achieving a higher-pitched sound, making both switches potentially appealing for users who value auditory feedback in their typing experience. Moreover, the clear design of the polycarbonate housing enhances the aesthetics of the switches, especially when paired with RGB lighting, as it beautifully diffuses colors and creates an engaging visual display.
On the other hand, the bottom housing of both switches is made from nylon, which contrasts with the properties of polycarbonate. Nylon is known for its softer characteristic, which permits sound absorption and results in a deeper, fuller sound profile. This inherent softness allows for a more muted resonance when bottoming out compared to a stiffer material. As a result, while the top housing of both the HMX 1989 and the Tuzi (Bunny) produces sharper and crisper sounds, the nylon bottom housing contributes to a rounder and more holistic sound, providing a layered acoustic experience that is characteristic of the switches.
Overall, the interplay of materials between the top and bottom housings in both the HMX 1989 and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) creates a balanced sound profile that caters to varied typing preferences. Given that both models utilize the same materials for each portion of the switch, users can expect a synergy in auditory feedback that merges the crispness of polycarbonate with the fullness of nylon. This combination underscores how varying housing materials can influence the final acoustic output, while similarities between the two models assure that they will lead to comparable results in sound quality and typing feel.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, notable differences in actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The HMX 1989 boasts an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) features a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 42 grams. This difference means that the Tuzi (Bunny) is overall lighter, making it potentially more comfortable for extended typing or gaming sessions, while the HMX 1989 may provide a more substantial feel for users who prefer a stronger push. Both switches demonstrate that as you press down, the force required to actuate and to bottom out varies, with the HMX 1989 requiring more force throughout the keystroke. Ultimately, users looking for a lighter experience should gravitate towards the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny), while those seeking a heavier, more tactile feedback might prefer the HMX 1989.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch differ in their travel distances, with the HMX 1989 having a travel distance of 4 mm and the Tuzi (Bunny) measuring at 3.6 mm. This means that the HMX 1989 offers a longer travel distance, which may provide a more pronounced tactile feedback and a sense of depth when typing, appealing to users who favor a more substantial keypress experience. In contrast, the shorter 3.6 mm travel distance of the Tuzi (Bunny) switch caters to gamers and users looking for quicker response times and faster actuation, making it a preferable choice for those who prioritize speed over depth. Ultimately, your choice between these two switches will depend on your personal preference for either a more responsive feel or a more traditional and hearty typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Tuzi (Bunny) for $3.49.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch stands out with its reputation for producing a deep, thocky sound that can create a satisfying auditory experience, often favored by those who appreciate a rich, bassy profile in their typing. This switch’s auditory character may contribute to a sense of sturdiness during use. In contrast, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) produces a clacky sound characterized as sharp, bright, and percussive, with high-pitched tones that resonate crisply when keys are engaged. For users who prefer a more pronounced sound without the deeper bassy undertones, the Tuzi (Bunny) is an excellent choice. However, the final sound profile will also rely on the keyboard's construction and the type of keycaps used, which can blend or elevate the switches' inherent acoustic qualities.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch provides an experience that is notably deep and firm, although specific tactile characteristics aren't highlighted in the provided information. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch is defined by its silky smoothness, which minimizes resistance during both key presses and releases, resulting in an effortless typing experience. This enhanced smoothness makes the Tuzi (Bunny) appealing for users looking for a fluid typing sensation. Hence, while the 1989 may have a more substantial tactile presence, the Tuzi (Bunny) emphasizes smoothness, offering a different dimension to the typing experience.
Both switches cater to distinct preferences, with the HMX 1989 excelling in a deep, thocky sound and providing a firm typing feel, whereas the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) focuses on a sharp, clacky audio profile combined with exceptional smoothness. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on whether you prioritize a more bass-heavy auditory feedback and a potentially firmer feel with the 1989, or if you seek a bright and crisp sound coupled with a silky typing experience from the Tuzi (Bunny). Each switch offers unique qualities that can enhance your mechanical keyboard experience, making them worthy contenders individualized by user preference.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch should be guided by your specific preferences and use case. If you prefer a slightly heavier bottom-out force, a more pronounced thocky sound, and a rich typing experience that provides a deeper resonance, the HMX 1989 is an excellent option for you. It offers a satisfying tactile response suitable for both gaming and typing tasks, especially if you enjoy the feeling of solid feedback with each key press. On the other hand, if you lean towards a lighter touch and crave a more lively, clacky sound with an exceptionally silky feel, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) may be your ideal switch. Its lighter actuation makes it easy to press, which could be particularly advantageous for fast-paced gaming and extended typing sessions, where comfort and smoothness are critical. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value a weightier, auditory response or a light, smooth typing experience. Both switches have their unique appeal, so consider what aspects matter most to you as you make your choice.
Mentioned in this article
