HMX Game1989 vs. Gazzew U4T
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Gazzew U4T switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and Gazzew U4T offer distinct experiences for users, catering to different preferences and typing styles. The HMX 1989, renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, delivers a pure linear feel that appeals to gamers and typists who favor smooth keystrokes without tactile bumps. This switch is perfect for those seeking a seamless and fluid typing experience, especially during high-intensity gaming sessions. In contrast, the Gazzew U4T strikes a balance between satisfying auditory feedback and tactile sensation, offering a bassy 'thock' with sharp, assertive tactility. This makes it an excellent choice for individuals who appreciate a more pronounced tactile experience, adding an extra layer of satisfaction to each keystroke. Both switches bring unique strengths to the table; the 1989 excels in fluidity and speed, while the U4T offers a gratifying tactile response. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel 17.5mm Korean spring
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and Gazzew U4T switches feature distinct top housing materials that significantly influence their acoustic characteristics. The HMX 1989 employs a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its stiffness and translucency. This allows for a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile that resonates well, particularly with RGB lighting, providing both aesthetic appeal and auditory clarity. In contrast, the U4T utilizes a proprietary blend of plastics often referred to as "boba plastic," which is softer in nature. As a result, the U4T's sound profile is richer and deeper, appealing to those who prefer a more subdued auditory experience. Thus, while the 1989's polycarbonate top contributes to a crisper sound, the U4T's blend offers a warmer tone, allowing users to choose based on their sound preference.
Examining the bottom housings of both switches reveals similarities in the materials utilized, which play a vital role in shaping the overall sound experience. The 1989's nylon bottom housing is recognized for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer composition, which absorbs sound more effectively. Similarly, the Gazzew U4T's bottom housing is also crafted from the proprietary "boba plastic," celebrated for its softness and ability to contribute to a rich auditory profile. This parallel in material choice indicates that both switches are likely to produce a deep sound, particularly at the point of bottoming out, a critical moment in keyboard usage that impacts tactile feedback and user satisfaction.
Ultimately, the overall auditory and tactile experience of the HMX 1989 and Gazzew U4T switches will be determined by the interplay of their respective top and bottom housing materials. Since both switches showcase a nylon or similar soft plastic in their bottom housings, they promise a fuller sound experience upon keypress. However, the differing properties of their top materials will create distinct sound profiles when keys are released. Consequently, users who favor a sharp, bright sound might prefer the 1989, while those leaning towards a warmer, rounder experience may gravitate toward the U4T. This exploration of materials underscores how nuanced the crafting of keyboard switches can be, catering to the diverse auditory preferences of the mechanical keyboard community.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The HMX 1989 features a medium-light actuation force of 45 grams, making it easier on the fingers during extended typing sessions, while its bottom out force is 53 grams. In contrast, the Gazzew U4T has an unknown actuation force but a heavier bottom out force of 65 grams. This indicates that while the U4T may provide a satisfying tactile feel, it requires a stronger push to fully engage compared to the HMX 1989. Therefore, for users seeking a lighter switch for prolonged typing or gaming, the HMX 1989 is the preferable option, while those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience might lean towards the U4T despite not having clear data on its actuation force. Overall, the 1989 offers an easier press, while the U4T demands more effort, especially in terms of bottoming out.
Travel distance
Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm, meaning that when you press down on either switch, you will experience an identical distance of movement from the top to the bottom. This similarity ensures that users will experience comparable feedback and actuation, making both switches suitable for those who prefer a consistent keypress feel. Since the travel distances are equal, users can expect similar results in terms of key responsiveness and typing experience when using either of these switches.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Gazzew U4T comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, which creates a satisfying auditory experience reminiscent of a soft thud or knock as the key is pressed and released. This characteristic sound is noted for being rich and profound, particularly in contrast to sharper or more high-pitched switches. The Gazzew U4T tactile switch also features a thocky sound, but it is complemented by a bassy resonance. This combination yields a sound profile that is equally deep and rich, making the U4T a pleasure to listen to as well. Both switches create a resonant auditory experience, although the layering of the bassy quality in the U4T adds an additional dimension that might appeal to those who prefer a fuller sound during key presses.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch is particularly valued, but the specific descriptions of its tactile feedback and characteristics are not provided in the given information. In contrast, the U4T is characterized by its sharp tactility, offering a strong and crisp tactile bump that delivers high intensity feedback with every keystroke. This tactile feature allows typists and gamers to feel distinctiveness with each press, promoting confidence in their input. While it's unknown how the feel of the 1989 would compare, the U4T’s sharpness distinctly stands out for those who favor tactile switches.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch deliver satisfying sound qualities, but with slight variations in their auditory character. The 1989 offers a deep thockiness, while the U4T combines that with a bassy undertone, enhancing the overall acoustic experience. On the feel front, the U4T is identified as sharp and intense, whereas the tactile and feedback qualities of the 1989 remain undefined, leaving a comparative gap for potential users. Ultimately, your choice may hinge on whether you prioritize the deep sound of the 1989 or the tactile feedback of the U4T, but both switches promise a rewarding experience in their own right.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Gazzew U4T tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you favor a switch that offers a lighter, smooth keystroke with a deep, satisfying sound, the HMX 1989 is an excellent option. Its medium-light force of 53 grams means it’s designed for rapid keystrokes, making it ideal for gamers who need to react quickly and efficiently without finger fatigue. On the other hand, if you appreciate a tactile experience paired with a more assertive bottom-out force and a bassy 'thock' sound, then the Gazzew U4T is likely the better fit for you. With its medium-heavy force of 65 grams and a sharp tactile bump, it provides a distinctly satisfying feedback that can enhance typing accuracy and enjoyment, especially for those who enjoy the tactile sensation of every keystroke. Consider how you’ll be using your keyboard—whether for gaming where speed is key, or typing where tactile feedback might enhance your experience—and make your switch choice accordingly.