HMX Game1989 vs. Wuque Studio WS Pearl
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting mechanical keyboard switches, two notable options stand out: the HMX 1989 and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl, both of which are linear switches but offer distinctly different typing experiences. The HMX 1989 is renowned for its deep, thocky sound profile, making it an attractive choice for gamers and typists who appreciate a more pronounced acoustic feedback during their keystrokes. Its unique characteristics lend themselves to a satisfying tactile experience that many find appealing for extended typing sessions. In contrast, the WS Pearl gains attention for its innovative use of ball bearings, which significantly reduce friction and result in an exceptionally smooth keystroke. This feature caters to users who prioritize a seamless and fluid typing experience, and its medium-high pitched sound signature adds a unique auditory element that distinguishes it from other switches. Ultimately, the choice between the HMX 1989 and the WS Pearl can depend on individual preferences, such as the desire for a thocky sound versus a butter-smooth feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
30g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
16mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The comparison between the HMX 1989 and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl reveals distinct differences in the materials used for their top housings, which significantly influence the acoustic profiles of each switch. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, known for its stiffness and ability to create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This characteristic is advantageous for users who prefer more pronounced auditory feedback and clarity, particularly when RGB lighting is in use, as the translucency of polycarbonate enhances the visual effects of the lighting. In contrast, the WS Pearl utilizes a nylon top housing, which is softer and absorbs sound more effectively, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This difference means that while the HMX 1989 may be better suited for a bright and vivid sound experience, the WS Pearl caters to those who prefer a more subdued and rounded auditory feedback.
However, both switches share a commonality when it comes to their bottom housings, with both the HMX 1989 and the WS Pearl featuring nylon. The qualities of nylon in the bottom housing contribute to a deeper, fuller sound that is characteristic of this classic switch housing material. Consequently, when users engage these switches, they experience a similar bottoming-out sound and feel due to the nylon's ability to absorb sound and create a smoother actuation experience. This coherence in the bottom housing allows for a consistent auditory experience when typing, despite the differences in the upper sections of the switch.
Ultimately, the diverging materials for the top housing and their similar bottom housing create a multi-faceted tactile experience for both the HMX 1989 and WS Pearl. For users who value a bright, resonant sound when pressing keys, the polycarbonate top of the HMX 1989 stands out, while the WS Pearl delivers a richer, warmer sound with its nylon material. Nonetheless, the shared nylon bottom housing ensures that both switches will provide a satisfying typing experience, with each housing material contributing uniquely to the overall sound signature of the respective switch. By understanding these dynamics, users can choose a switch that aligns with their personal preferences, knowing that each offers distinct yet complementary qualities.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch, there are distinct differences in their actuation forces, although both switches provide substantial bottom-out forces. The HMX 1989 features a medium-light actuation force of 45 grams, while the WS Pearl has a lighter actuation force of just 30 grams. This means that users looking for a less tiring experience during prolonged typing or gaming sessions may prefer the WS Pearl due to its lighter actuation force. However, the bottom-out forces present an interesting contrast; the 1989's bottom-out force measures 53 grams, whereas the WS Pearl has a slightly higher bottom-out force of 58 grams. This difference suggests that while the WS Pearl requires less force to register a keystroke, it still offers a more substantial feel when bottoming out. Thus, for those who enjoy a lighter switch for actuation but still prefer a firmer bottom-out experience, the WS Pearl may be an optimal choice. In summary, the HMX 1989 is the heavier option regarding actuation force, while the WS Pearl is lighter, providing a distinct tactile experience for users based on their preferences.
Travel distance
The HMX 1989 linear switch features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This difference of 0.5 mm highlights the varying preferences for switch responsiveness and tactile feedback. The 1989's 4 mm travel distance aligns with the more traditional approach, providing a deeper feel that some users may appreciate for its sturdiness. On the other hand, the WS Pearl's shorter 3.5 mm travel distance caters to those who prioritize quicker response times, making it an appealing choice for gamers or those who prefer a more rapid keystroke. Therefore, if you're in search of a switch that delivers a more pronounced depth, the HMX 1989 would be the ideal choice, whereas if you're looking for a brisker actuation, the WS Pearl would better suit your needs.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Wuque Studio WS Pearl comes in at $6.00 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for producing a deep and thocky sound signature, offering a satisfying auditory feedback during typing that many enthusiasts find pleasing. This characteristic makes it particularly enjoyable for gaming and typing tasks, as it can enhance the overall experience of using the keyboard. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch has a medium-high pitched sound that may seem less bass-heavy than that of the 1989. While both switches offer distinct auditory experiences, the choice may ultimately depend on personal preference, as the sound can also be influenced by various factors, such as the keyboard construction and the keycaps used.
Regarding feel, the HMX 1989 is celebrated for its rich tactile engagement, providing a sense of depth with each keystroke that makes it particularly responsive during intense typing or gaming sessions. On the other hand, the WS Pearl's unique feature of ball bearings greatly enhances its smoothness, resulting in an incredibly fluid keystroke experience that many users describe as surreal. This design reduces friction, leading to a different physical sensation when typing, where each actuation feels almost effortless, contrasting with the more tactile presence of the 1989.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch offer unique auditory and tactile quality that caters to different preferences. The 1989 is a robust option for those who enjoy a deeper sound and tactile feedback, while the WS Pearl appeals to those seeking a smoother and more fluid typing experience. Both switches, while distinct in their characteristics, provide ample opportunity for users to enjoy a satisfying mechanical keyboard experience tailored to their individual taste.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl switch, consider your personal preferences regarding actuation force and overall typing experience. If you favor a lighter feel and a thocky sound profile that provides a satisfying tactile punch with each keystroke, the HMX 1989 switch is an excellent choice. Its bottom-out force of 53 grams makes it an appealing option for extended typing sessions or gaming, where a lighter switch can reduce fatigue. On the other hand, if you prioritize an ultra-smooth, frictionless keystroke and don’t mind a slightly heavier actuation force, the WS Pearl with its unique ball-bearing design will enhance your typing experience significantly. This switch's medium actuation force of 58 grams can offer more stability and responsiveness, ideal for users who crave a refined typing experience paired with a unique sound profile. Ultimately, your selection should reflect your typing style—whether you prefer the thocky resonance of the HMX 1989 or the silky-smooth motion of the WS Pearl, each switch provides a distinctive mechanism to elevate your mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
