HMX Game1989 vs. Wuque Studio WS POM+
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to the world of mechanical keyboards, choosing the right switch can significantly enhance your typing experience. The HMX 1989 switch is renowned for its remarkable depth and "thocky" acoustics, making it a favorite among gamers and typists who appreciate a profound audio feedback while typing. Its linear design ensures a smooth keystroke throughout, providing a consistent experience without any tactile bump or click. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switch offers an advanced all-POM construction, which contributes to its exceptionally smooth keystrokes and a unique sound profile that also emphasizes a satisfying "thock." Both switches cater to users seeking a linear type feel, but they each provide distinctive auditory and tactile experiences that can influence one’s typing preference. Ultimately, choosing between the HMX 1989 and the WS POM+ depends on personal taste in sound and feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm extended double-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX 1989 and Wuque Studio WS POM+ present distinct auditory experiences due to their diverging compositions. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing that promotes a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is attributed to polycarbonate’s stiffer nature, which enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound produced. Furthermore, the translucent quality of polycarbonate is particularly advantageous for RGB lighting setups, as it allows light to emanate beautifully through the switch, creating a visually appealing aesthetic. In contrast, the WS POM+ employs POM (Polyoxymethylene) in both its top and bottom housings, which contributes to a uniquely muted and deeper sound profile. The sound characteristics of POM differ significantly from polycarbonate, as it yields a more subdued auditory experience that lacks the crystalline brilliance offered by polycarbonate.
When analyzing the bottom housing materials, both switches incorporate synthetic plastics that provide distinct advantages, albeit with different outcomes. The nylon bottom housing of the HMX 1989 produces a deeper and fuller sound profile, benefiting from nylon's softer plastic composition which absorbs sound more effectively. This leads to a sound that is rounder and less sharp. On the other hand, the WS POM+ features a POM bottom housing that also cultivates a pleasing and deeper sound, though it retains a muted quality that aligns with the overall tonality of the POM material. Though both the HMX 1989 and WS POM+ bottom housings contribute to enriched sound experiences, the nylon in the 1989 offers a slightly different texture compared to the dampened yet pleasing profile of the POM in the WS POM+.
Ultimately, while the HMX 1989 and WS POM+ each employ different materials in their top and bottom housings, resultantly influencing their sound profiles, it is possible to achieve comparable results by considering the synergies of these components. Sound characteristics will be split between the top and bottom housings, with the top affecting the release sound and the bottom playing a significant role in the bottom-out sound. Switches utilizing POM in both the top and bottom housing, like the WS POM+, will yield a different auditory sensation than a switch with a polycarbonate top and nylon bottom, like the HMX 1989. However, both setups can still be enjoyable depending on user preference, with each providing unique auditory feedback and tactile experiences, ultimately leading to personal choices in sound and feel that enrich the typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, both exhibit similar actuation forces. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams, which matches the WS POM+, making both switches equally responsive to keystrokes for users who prefer a lighter touch. In terms of bottom out force, the HMX 1989 measures 53 grams, while the WS POM+ has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 55 grams. This indicates that while both switches provide a medium-light typing experience, the WS POM+ offers a marginally more substantial feel at the bottom. Consequently, users who favor a stronger push feel might gravitate towards the WS POM+ for that extra resistance when bottoming out, while those looking for a lighter touch may prefer the overall experience of the HMX 1989. Overall, both switches could appeal to users who prioritize moderate actuation forces, but the WS POM+ edges out with a heavier bottom out sensation.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, there is a notable difference. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the WS POM+ has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. The longer travel distance of the HMX 1989 aligns with more traditional switch designs, providing a more substantial feel when pressed, which may appeal to those who prefer a deeper actuation. Conversely, the WS POM+, with its shorter travel distance, is likely to offer quicker response times, catering to gamers and others who value speed and efficiency in their keystrokes. Ultimately, choosing between these two switches depends on whether you lean towards the more pronounced actuation of the HMX 1989 or the snappier response of the WS POM+.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Wuque Studio WS POM+ comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deep and thocky sound, making it a favorite among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts who appreciate a pronounced auditory feedback during typing. This switch produces a rich, resonant sound that enhances the tactile experience, providing a satisfying auditory cue with every keystroke. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch also delivers a deep "thock" sound signature, contributing to a full-bodied acoustic experience that resonates with users seeking a robust typing environment. While both switches aim for a similar auditory profile, the final sound performance will still be influenced by factors such as the specific keyboard layout and keycap materials used.
In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 offers a uniquely plush and cushioned keystroke, designed to provide a deeply satisfying tactile experience that encourages extended typing sessions without fatigue. Users often find the actuation smooth and plush, facilitating a type of keystroke that many describe as "luxurious." The WS POM+ switch is characterized by its buttery-smooth keystroke, which promises an equally enjoyable typing experience while maintaining a linear feel. This switch emphasizes a seamless transition with no tactile bump, catering to typists who prefer a fluid keystroke. While both switches may appeal to different preferences regarding overall typing dynamics, they share a common goal of delivering comfort and ease during use.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch provide a satisfying auditory and tactile experience, appealing to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. While they both feature a deep, thocky sound profile, the HMX 1989's plush keystroke contrasts with the WS POM+'s buttery smoothness, allowing users to choose based on their specific typing preferences. When paired with suitable keycap and board combinations, you can achieve gratifying results with either switch, making them excellent choices for anyone seeking to enhance their typing experience.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prioritize a deep, thocky sound and a unique typing experience reminiscent of nostalgia, the HMX 1989 is likely the better option for you. Its slightly lower bottom-out force of 53 grams can also make it more suitable for extended typing sessions, particularly if you enjoy a softer touch. On the other hand, if you seek an unparalleled smoothness with a robust and satisfying sound signature that enhances your overall experience, the WS POM+ is a fantastic choice. The build of the all-POM switch coupled with a 55-gram bottom-out force ensures a refreshing tactile feel that many users find desirable. In essence, your decision should be guided by whether you lean towards the robust thockiness of the HMX 1989 or the superior smoothness and satisfying feedback of the WS POM+.
Mentioned in this article
