HMX 1989 vs. HMX Xinhai
An in-depth look at the HMX 1989 and the HMX Xinhai switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and HMX Xinhai represent two appealing options, both classified as linear switches yet offering distinctly different experiences. The HMX 1989, renowned for its deep and thocky sound profile, promises a robust tactile experience reminiscent of classic gaming keyboards and is ideal for users seeking that satisfying, resonant feel with each keystroke. In contrast, the HMX Xinhai features a unique PA12 top housing that enhances acoustics, pairing it with a POM stem to deliver a sharper, higher-pitched resonance. Described as 'Bouncy,' 'Clacky,' and 'Creamy,' the Xinhai switch appeals to those who prefer a more nuanced typing sound and a responsive touch. Both switches cater to different preferences in gaming and typing scenarios, inviting users to consider their individual needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials used in the HMX 1989 and the HMX Xinhai present a compelling comparison, highlighting the technological and acoustic philosophies embedded in each design. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its stiff structure and translucent properties. This material choice results in a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile that resonates clearly, making it particularly well-suited for applications where RGB lighting is utilized. The clear polycarbonate not only contributes to the aesthetic appeal of the switch but also enhances its acoustic performance, ensuring that the sound generated is crisp and well-defined. On the other hand, the HMX Xinhai opts for a nylon top housing, which is renowned for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon allows it to absorb more sound, leading to a duller and rounder auditory experience compared to its polycarbonate counterpart.
When examining the bottom housing materials, both the HMX 1989 and HMX Xinhai utilize nylon, promoting a sense of auditory consistency despite the differences in their top housing materials. As noted, the nylon bottom housing plays a crucial role in shaping the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, delivering that fuller sound profile characteristic of switches that utilize this material. The dual use of nylon in both models' bottom housings indicates a shared understanding of how this material contributes to tactile feedback and auditory experience, regardless of the differing acoustic traits imparted by the respective top housings. Thus, while the HMX 1989 and HMX Xinhai diverge in their top housing components, they converge in their nylon bottom housings, ensuring a similar foundational experience in terms of auditory depth and keyboard impact.
In summary, the distinct characteristics of the HMX 1989's polycarbonate top housing and the HMX Xinhai's nylon alternative emphasize their unique approaches to sound design. The polycarbonate's clarity and sharpness contrast with the fuller, rounder tones delivered by nylon, presenting keyboard users with varied auditory experiences based on their choice of switch. However, the unifying component of nylon in the bottom housing ensures that both switches maintain a level of consistency when it comes to tactile feedback and sound dampening. As a result, while users may experience different qualities during gameplay or typing due to the top housing variations, both models are likely to lead to an enjoyable experience with an emphasis on the sound profiles that their users prefer.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces that cater to varying preferences among users. The HMX 1989 requires an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, positioning it as a medium-light switch. In contrast, the HMX Xinhai features a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a more suitable choice for those who favor a softer touch and lighter typing experience. Consequently, users who type for extended periods or engage in prolonged gaming sessions may find the Xinhai more comfortable. The heavier HMX 1989, with its stronger force requirement, can provide a more substantial feedback during typing, appealing to those who prefer a greater resistance. Overall, while both switches enable effective key activation, the Xinhai's lower forces make it the lighter option, whereas the 1989 provides a heftier feel.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, it is evident that the 1989 model has a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Xinhai switch features a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. This difference in travel distance influences the overall feel and response of each switch. With its 4 mm distance, the 1989 switch offers a more pronounced depth that many users may find comfortable, as it provides a more tactile feedback that can be preferable for those who enjoy a traditional feel. On the other hand, the Xinhai switch's 3.4 mm travel distance caters to users seeking quicker response times, particularly favored by gamers and users who prioritize speed. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches hinges on personal preference: those who appreciate a deeper key press may lean towards the 1989, whereas those who desire a more responsive and rapid activation might opt for the Xinhai.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX 1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the 1989 for $3.29.
The HMX Xinhai has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Xinhai for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch stands out for its deep, thocky acoustics, characteristic of a heavy thump when keys are pressed, which gives the typing experience a foundational and robust quality. This deep sound profile is particularly favored by gamers and typists who appreciate a more pronounced auditory feedback. On the other hand, the HMX Xinhai switch is known for its clacky nature, producing a sharp, crisp, and bright sound with a percussive quality upon actuation. The unique PA12 top housing allows the Xinhai to deliver a higher-pitched resonance that can create an engaging soundscape. While the 1989 provides a richer sound that resonates through the typing experience, the Xinhai offers a crisper and more articulated auditory feedback, leading to different preferences among users.
Regarding feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch is lauded for its smooth operation, which is reminiscent of traditional linear switches that allow for fluid keystrokes without any tactile bump or resistance. This seamless movement lends itself to a consistent typing rhythm, though specific feedback on its finer tactile characteristics is not provided. In contrast, the HMX Xinhai switch features both bouncy and creamy attributes, creating a sensation that combines spring-like feedback with a buttery smoothness. The bounciness provides a delightful rebound effect, adding a lively dynamic during typing, while the creamy texture streamlines the experience, making key presses feel luxurious and effortless. The Xinhai's unique feel sets it apart, promoting a more engaging typing experience for those who appreciate tactile feedback.
In summary, both the HMX 1989 and HMX Xinhai linear switches bring their own distinct qualities to the table. The 1989 excels in delivering a satisfying, deep sound and a smooth feel, perfect for those who favor a solid and grounded typing experience. Conversely, the Xinhai charms with its crisp, clacky sound and a delightful, lively feel, combining bounciness with a silky smoothness. When choosing between the two, it ultimately comes down to personal preference—those who enjoy a deep and thocky response may lean towards the 1989, while those seeking brightness and a more dynamic feedback experience may gravitate towards the Xinhai.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch ultimately depends on your typing preferences and the types of activities you'll be engaging in. If you appreciate a medium-light bottom-out force with a deeper, thocky sound profile, the HMX 1989 might be the ideal fit for you. Its distinctively rich acoustics make it well-suited for gaming and long typing sessions, where a more substantial keypress can add to the tactile satisfaction and feedback. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch with a snappier, clacky sound and an engaging bouncy feel, the HMX Xinhai would be the better choice. Its softer actuation and higher-pitched resonance are perfect for those who enjoy a lively typing experience and crisp sound feedback, especially in fast-paced scenarios like gaming or coding. In the end, evaluating how each switch aligns with your personal preferences in sound, feel, and actuation force will guide you toward the switch that enhances your typing experience the most.
Mentioned in this article
