Huano Acacia vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the Huano Acacia and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Huano Acacia and KTT Kang White are two intriguing options for enthusiasts seeking a premium typing experience. The Huano Acacia, known for its medium-light weight, generous factory lubrication, and minimal stem wobble, delivers an exceptional feel right out of the box, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize smooth, responsive keystrokes in daily typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, the KTT Kang White stands out as an exquisite representation of a poppy linear switch, offering a dazzling typing sound that elevates the auditory experience while typing. Additionally, its self-lubricating material contributes to an unparalleled smoothness that many users adore. While both switches offer distinct advantages—such as the Acacia's smoothness and user-friendly setup and the Kang White's remarkable sound and luxurious feel—they cater to different preferences and styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials used in the Huano Acacia and the KTT Kang White switches exhibit notable similarities, particularly in their top and bottom configurations. Both switches feature polycarbonate as the material for the top housing, which is recognized for its ability to produce a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This sonic clarity is a result of polycarbonate's relatively stiff nature, allowing for a more resonant sound. Additionally, both types of switches benefit aesthetically from the translucency of polycarbonate, making them well-suited for RGB lighting applications. This consistency in top housing materials ensures that users will achieve similar sound characteristics when using RGB features, regardless of the switch type.
In contrast, the lower housings of both the Huano Acacia and KTT Kang White switches are made from nylon. This choice of material contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing, attributed to nylon's softer properties that absorb more sound compared to harder plastics. As a result, the bottom housing of both switches encourages a rounder sound that contrasts with the clarity produced by the polycarbonate tops. The combined use of polycarbonate for the top and nylon for the bottom in both switches creates a balanced auditory experience, bringing together the vibrancy of high-pitched sounds with the richness of deeper frequencies.
The interplay between the two housing materials in each switch mimics the effects of hybrid sound profiles that many typists seek. Since both switches utilize polycarbonate and nylon in the same configuration, users can expect comparable overall experiences from the Huano Acacia and KTT Kang White. The characteristics imparted by the nylon bottom housing having more influence on the bottom-out sound and feel, along with the top housing's impact on the release sound, contribute to a holistic tactile experience. Thus, while they are distinct products, the similarities in their materials lend themselves to achieving consistent sound profiles and typing experiences across both switch types.
Weight
The Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch exhibit some similarities and differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. Both switches have the same actuation force of 45 grams, which means they will provide a similar keystroke trigger feel, making them manageable for extended typing sessions without causing fatigue. However, the bottom out forces differ slightly: the Acacia switch has a bottom out force of 55 grams, while the Kang White switch has a firmer bottom out force of 58 grams. This indicates that while both switches are comparable in initial actuation, those who prefer a more substantial typing experience that comes with a higher bottom out force might lean towards the KTT Kang White. In terms of weight, both switches could be considered medium-light to medium, with the Acacia being marginally lighter due to its lower bottom out force. Thus, for users seeking a balance between comfort and feedback during long periods of use, the Acacia may be the better option, whereas those desiring a stronger push feel might prefer the Kang White.
Travel distance
The Huano Acacia linear switch offers a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the KTT Kang White linear switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This difference indicates that pressing the Kang White switch allows for a deeper engagement, which some users might appreciate for a more tactile feel during typing. In contrast, the Acacia switch, with its shorter travel distance, caters to those who favor responsiveness and quicker actuation, making it potentially more appealing for gaming. Therefore, if you prefer a snappier, more responsive keypress, the Acacia would be the better choice, while the Kang White would suit those who enjoy a more pronounced key travel. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches should reflect your personal preference for either a shorter or longer travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Huano Acacia comes in at $3.39, whereas the KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Huano Acacia linear switch is known for its smooth operation, but specific characteristics of its sound profile weren't provided. Meanwhile, the KTT Kang White switch boasts a low-pitched and neutral sound. The low-pitched nature of the Kang White contributes to a bass-heavy quality, providing a mellow and pleasant auditory experience. The neutral aspect means its sound profile is versatile and suitable for various environments, making it a good choice whether you’re working in an office or gaming at home. The Acacia's sound, while not explicitly detailed, is likely to be similarly pleasant given its overall design focus on a satisfying typing experience.
When it comes to feel, the Huano Acacia switch is noted for its medium-light weight, which should facilitate a comfortable typing experience, particularly due to its generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble. This combination typically leads to a consistent and enjoyable feel as you type. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White switch is celebrated for its exceptional smoothness, stemming from its self-lubricating material. This means that while both switches aim for a pleasant tactile experience, the Acacia may feel slightly different due to its specific weight characteristics compared to the silky smoothness offered by the Kang White.
In conclusion, while the Huano Acacia and KTT Kang White linear switches both offer excellent typing experiences, they cater to slightly different preferences. The Acacia provides a stable and smooth feel right from the box, making it accessible for newcomers. In contrast, the Kang White is designed to deliver superior smoothness and a pleasing sound profile, making it a standout choice for those who favor a poppy auditory experience. Ultimately, both switches will provide satisfying results, but your choice will depend on whether you prioritize a more straightforward typing feel or an enhanced acoustic performance.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing habits. If you favor a lighter touch with a bottom-out force of 55 grams, the Acacia switches offer a delightful typing experience straight out of the box, thanks to their medium-light weight, generous factory lubrication, and minimal stem wobble. These features can make them particularly appealing for prolonged typing sessions, especially if you value comfort and ease of use. On the other hand, if you appreciate a slightly more pronounced tactile feedback with a bottom-out force of 58 grams, the KTT Kang White switches stand out with their unique poppy sound profile and unparalleled smoothness. Their low-pitched and neutral characteristics contribute to an engaging auditory experience, making these switches a great choice for both home and work environments. In summary, choose the Acacia for effortless, comfortable typing with a smooth feel, and opt for the Kang White if you desire a more dynamic sound and a satisfying solid typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
