Aflion Blush vs. Wuque Studio WS Jade
An in-depth look at the Aflion Blush and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Blush and the Wuque Studio WS Jade both offer unique features and characteristics to enhance your typing experience. The Blush is praised for its smooth and snappy feel, thanks to its longer two-stage spring and poppy sound signature. On the other hand, the WS Jade stands out for its bright metallic sound profile and enchanting RGB display, as well as a creamy and smooth typing experience. While the Blush is categorized as 'Low-pitched', 'Creamy', 'Silky', and 'Buttery', the WS Jade is described as 'Clacky', 'Marbly', 'Resonant', 'Silky', and 'Creamy'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal, but determining the best choice for you may require a closer look into their specific features and functionalities. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Dual-stage stainless steel spring
Spring
18mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The Aflion Blush and the Wuque Studio WS Jade both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The Blush utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound compared to the POM top housing of the WS Jade, which has a deeper and more muted sound. However, both switches offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences. The translucency of the polycarbonate in the Blush's top housing is also ideal for use with RGB lighting, adding an aesthetic appeal to the switch.
In terms of the bottom housing material, the Blush features a nylon bottom housing that produces a deeper and fuller sound profile, while the WS Jade's POM bottom housing also creates a deeper and more muted sound. Both switches provide a unique typing experience due to the characteristics of their bottom housing materials. The softer nylon material in the Blush absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound, whereas the POM material in the WS Jade contributes to its pleasing sound profile.
Although the housing materials of the Aflion Blush and Wuque Studio WS Jade differ, they both aim to enhance the typing experience with their unique sound profiles. While the Blush prioritizes a sharper and crisper sound with its polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, the WS Jade offers a deeper and more muted sound with its POM housing materials. Despite their differences, both switches are designed to provide an enjoyable typing experience for users seeking distinct sound profiles in their mechanical keyboards.
Weight
The Aflion Blush linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch have differences in their actuation force and bottom out force. The Blush has a lighter actuation force of None grams, while the WS Jade has a slightly heavier actuation force of 50 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Blush requires 58 grams, while the WS Jade requires 60 grams. Both switches fall into the medium force category. The Blush offers a lighter typing experience due to its lower actuation force, making it easier for longer typing sessions, while the WS Jade provides a slightly stronger push feel for those seeking a more substantial typing experience. Overall, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
Comparing the travel distance of the Aflion Blush linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, we can see that the Blush has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm compared to the WS Jade's 3.6 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, which are often preferred by gamers for faster response times. However, the slight difference in travel distance may result in the Blush feeling slightly more responsive than the WS Jade. On the other hand, some users may prefer the slightly longer travel distance of the WS Jade for a more substantial keypress feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference for travel distance and keypress feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Blush has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Blush for $4.07.
The Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Aflion Blush linear switch offers a low-pitched and poppy sound profile, providing a bass-heavy and mellow tone with a snappy and full feel. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch is characterized by a clacky, marbly, and resonant sound profile, producing a sharp, bright, and percussive sound when pressed. The inclusion of a metallic insert in the stem base creates a unique metallic and resonant sound, adding to the overall typing experience. Depending on personal preference and setup, the sound produced by these switches can vary and be further influenced by the choice of keyboard and keycaps.
When it comes to feel, both the Blush and WS Jade switches offer a creamy and silky typing experience, enhancing the overall smoothness of the feel and minimizing resistance when pressing and releasing keys. The Aflion Blush switch is described as creamy, silky, and buttery, providing a smooth and buttery typing sensation that feels like gliding your fingers effortlessly across the keys. Similarly, the WS Jade switch is also described as silky and creamy, offering a uniquely creamy and smooth typing experience with a rock-solid bottom-out that adds to the typing feel. With both switches offering a similar smooth and silky feel, users can expect a consistent and enjoyable typing experience regardless of their choice.
Overall, both the Aflion Blush linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch provide unique sound and feel qualities that cater to different preferences. The Blush switch excels in offering a low-pitched, poppy sound with a creamy and smooth feel due to its two-stage spring design, while the WS Jade switch stands out with its clacky, marbly, and resonant sound profile, paired with a creamy and smooth typing experience. With a variety of subjective qualities to consider, such as sound pitch and typing smoothness, newcomers to the mechanical keyboard world can experiment with these switches to determine which best suits their preferences for an optimal typing experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Aflion Blush linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, consider the characteristics that align with your preferences. If you prioritize a smooth and snappy typing experience with a poppy sound, the Blush may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a creamy and silky feel with a bright metallic and resonant sound profile, the WS Jade could be the ideal option. Remember to also factor in the slight differences in bottom-out force, with the Blush at 58 grams and the WS Jade at 60 grams. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal typing style and sound preferences.
Mentioned in this article
