Gazzew Bobagum vs. Wuque Studio WS Jade
An in-depth look at the Gazzew Bobagum and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gazzew Bobagum and the Wuque Studio WS Jade mechanical keyboard switches, it becomes evident that they both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Bobagum is lauded for its unparalleled smoothness and nearly silent sound profile, making it a perfect choice for those who prefer a muted and subtle typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Jade stands out for its metallic insert in the stem base, creating a bright and resonant sound profile, along with a light diffuser for a captivating RGB display. The typing experience on the WS Jade is described as creamy and smooth, with a rock-solid bottom-out. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel 14.5mm Korean spring
Spring
18mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
The Gazzew Bobagum and the Wuque Studio WS Jade both have unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The Bobagum features a proprietary Gazzew blend top and bottom housing, known for delivering a rich and deep sound due to its softness. On the other hand, the WS Jade utilizes a POM top and bottom housing, which creates a pleasing and unique sound profile that is deeper and more muted. While both switches aim to provide a rich sound experience, the Bobagum's boba plastic blend may offer a slightly softer and more resonant tone compared to the WS Jade's POM material.
In terms of construction, both the Gazzew Bobagum and the Wuque Studio WS Jade have differing top and bottom housing materials. This allows for a split in the qualities each housing material brings to the switch. The bottom housing, whether it be the Bobagum's Gazzew blend or the WS Jade's POM material, has a more significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on a key. Conversely, the top housing material, whether it be the Gazzew blend or POM, will have a greater influence on the sound produced when letting go of a key. This split in housing materials allows for a more nuanced sound profile for both switches.
While the housing materials used in the Gazzew Bobagum and the Wuque Studio WS Jade may differ, both switches aim to provide a rich and deep sound profile. The Gazzew blend in the Bobagum offers a soft and resonant tone, while the POM material in the WS Jade creates a more muted and deep sound experience. Despite these differences, both switches are designed to enhance the overall sound quality of mechanical keyboards. Whether you prefer the softer tones of the Bobagum or the deeper sound of the WS Jade, both switches offer a unique and enjoyable typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gazzew Bobagum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, it can be seen that the Bobagum has a slightly lighter actuation force of 46 grams compared to the WS Jade's 50 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Bobagum requires 62 grams while the WS Jade needs 60 grams, making the WS Jade slightly lighter in this aspect. Both switches fall into the medium range in terms of actuation and bottom out forces. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience to prevent fatigue during long typing sessions or gaming, the Bobagum might be the better choice. On the other hand, individuals who enjoy a slightly more substantial typing feel may lean towards the WS Jade. Ultimately, the differences in actuation and bottom out forces between the two switches are minimal, and users can expect similar results in terms of overall typing experience with either option.
Travel distance
Both the Gazzew Bobagum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch have a travel distance of 3.6 mm, making them identical in this aspect. When comparing their travel distance, it can be concluded that they will provide a similar typing experience in terms of key travel. This means that whether you choose the Bobagum or the WS Jade, you can expect to feel the same distance when pressing down on a key. In terms of travel distance, the two switches are both equal in length, offering a consistent typing experience regardless of the choice between the two.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Gazzew Bobagum comes in at $6.50, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gazzew Bobagum linear switch offers a muted typing experience, producing a softer and quieter sound compared to regular switches. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch provides a clacky and resonant sound profile with a bright metallic tone. Depending on personal preference, the Bobagum may be more suitable for those seeking a quieter typing experience, while the WS Jade may appeal to individuals who enjoy a crisp and percussive sound when typing.
Moving on to feel, the Bobagum switch is described as having a subtle resistance, providing a gentle typing feel without being too light or too heavy. This switch is also noted for its unparalleled smoothness and unique tactility. In comparison, the WS Jade switch offers a silky and creamy typing experience, enhancing the overall smoothness of the keystrokes and minimizing resistance during key presses. Both switches aim to provide a comfortable and pleasant typing experience, with the Bobagum focusing on smoothness and tactility, while the WS Jade emphasizes a silky and buttery feel.
In conclusion, the Gazzew Bobagum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch offer distinct qualities in both sound and feel. The Bobagum switch stands out for its muted sound profile and gentle resistance, ideal for those seeking a smoother and quieter typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Jade switch features a clacky and resonant sound with a silky and creamy feel, providing a unique typing experience with a bright metallic tone. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience. If you prefer a particular quality in one switch over the other, you can expect similar results based on the provided details to guide your decision.
Conclusion
In summary, when considering whether to choose the Gazzew Bobagum linear switch or the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, your decision should be based on your preferences for typing experience and sound profile. If you are looking for a switch that offers a unique tactility with a smooth and almost 'matte' feel, as well as a nearly silent sound profile, then the Bobagum may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a bright metallic and resonant sound profile, paired with a creamy and smooth typing experience, then the WS Jade could be the better option. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal preference for how you want your typing experience to feel and sound.
Mentioned in this article
