Akko Botany vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the Akko Botany and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the Akko Botany and KTT Kang White offer two distinct experiences in the realm of linear switches. The Akko Botany is celebrated for its vibrant and crisp clacky sound, which brings a lively auditory feedback that many users find satisfying right out of the box. Its engaging acoustic performance can be particularly appealing for those who enjoy a bit of sound while typing. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White stands out as a superb poppy linear switch, delivering an exquisite typing experience characterized by its dazzling sound profile. Additionally, it features a self-lubricating material that ensures unparalleled smoothness, making it a fantastic option for users who prioritize a fluid typing feel. Both switches cater to different preferences, whether one leans towards an engaging audio experience or seeks a silken typing sensation. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
38g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Nylon Pro
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Akko Botany and the KTT Kang White switches, one immediately notices a significant distinction in the choice of materials for the top housings. The Akko Botany features a nylon top housing, which is known for its ability to produce a deeper and fuller sound profile. This characteristic stems from nylon’s inherently softer properties, allowing it to absorb more sound vibrations and create a softer auditory experience. In contrast, the KTT Kang White employs a polycarbonate top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile because of polycarbonate’s stiffer nature. This material enhances the clarity and resonance of the switch's sound, leading to a more vivid auditory feedback when typing.
However, both switches demonstrate consistency in their bottom housing materials, as both the Akko Botany and KTT Kang White utilize nylon for this component. As a classic switch housing material, nylon retains its reputation for producing a deeper sound experience, contributing significantly to the overall acoustic profile. This alignment means that even though the two switches have differing sound characteristics in the top housing, the use of nylon in the bottom housing provides a shared quality that results in a fuller sound during typing. The impact of the bottom housing on the bottom-out sound and tactile feel is significant, creating a harmonious balance in acoustic properties between both switches despite their top housings being dissimilar.
Considering the overall sound profile when both types of switches are utilized, it is essential to recognize how the characteristics of each housing interact with one another. The polycarbonate top housing of the KTT Kang White would provide a lively sound when a key is released, while the nylon bottom housing in both switches ensures a rich depth when keys bottom out. This means that while the Akko Botany conveys a full, round sound profile overall, the KTT Kang White's combination can generate a distinct appeal through the clarity of the top housing. The contrasting materials ultimately impact the typing experience uniquely, showcasing how the interplay of different housing materials influences the acoustic nature of mechanical switches.
Weight
When comparing the Akko Botany linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, we see notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces. The Botany switch has a lighter actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it suitable for users who prefer a softer touch, especially for prolonged typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, the Kang White requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, appealing to those who favor a more substantial typing feel. This means that while both switches are designed for linear responsiveness, the Botany is the lighter option, promoting easier keystrokes, whereas the Kang White offers a heavier and arguably more tactile experience. Therefore, if a user prioritizes comfort and ease during extended use, the Akko Botany would be the preferred choice, while the KTT Kang White caters to those who enjoy a stronger push feel.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Akko Botany linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, the differences are clear. The Botany features a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Kang White has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This means that if you choose the Botany switch, you'll experience a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, which is particularly advantageous for gamers who prioritize fast actions. Conversely, the Kang White offers a more traditional and deeper feel, which may appeal to those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. Thus, if you prefer a more responsive touch, the Botany would be the better choice, while the Kang White is suited for those who appreciate a more pronounced key press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Akko Botany has an MSRP of $3.89 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Botany for $3.11.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Akko Botany linear switch produces a crisp and lively clacky tone straight out of the box, making it ideal for those who appreciate an auditory feedback while typing. In contrast, the KTT Kang White switch has a low-pitched sound profile that leans towards a bass-heavy and mellow tone, paired with a neutral sound characteristic. This balance in tone allows the Kang White to be versatile enough for various typing environments, whether they are casual or professional. While both switches offer distinct auditory experiences, the Botany may appeal to those seeking a sharper sound, while the Kang White suits users who prefer a smoother auditory experience. It's worth noting that the overall sound of each switch can also heavily depend on keyboard components like the board and keycaps used.
When it comes to the feel of each switch, the Akko Botany's tactile characteristics aren't explicitly described, but its lively sound hints at a potentially engaging typing experience. The KTT Kang White, however, boasts an exquisite smoothness attributed to its self-lubricating material. This feature not only enhances the typing experience but also contributes to a more pleasant overall feel. Users will likely find the Kang White to be exceptionally smooth and fluid, making it a standout choice for those who prioritize a seamless keystroke.
In conclusion, while the Akko Botany linear switch is ideal for those who enjoy a crisp and lively typing sound, the KTT Kang White balances a soft and mellow tone with an exceptionally smooth feel due to its self-lubricating properties. Both switches cater to different auditory and tactile preferences, allowing users to choose according to their typing style and environment. Their unique characteristics ensure that both can provide satisfying experiences, whether for gaming or professional typing. If you appreciate sound and feedback, both switches can yield enjoyable results while complementing your keyboard setup.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Akko Botany linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, you should consider both your typing preferences and the environment in which you'll be using the keyboard. Choose the Akko Botany if you prefer a lighter actuation force at 45 grams, which can offer a more relaxed typing experience for extended use, especially if you enjoy a lively and crisp sound profile that immediately catches your attention. This makes it ideal for those who appreciate a more pronounced auditory feedback while typing. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier and firmer feel with a bottom out force of 58 grams, the KTT Kang White is likely more suited to your needs. It provides a smooth typing experience thanks to its self-lubricating material and has a low-pitched sound that may be more pleasing in quieter environments or workplaces, allowing for a balanced performance whether you are a beginner or an experienced typist. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your comfort in typing feel and sound preference, as both switches cater to distinct experiences that can enhance your productivity and enjoyment.