Zuoce Bubblegum vs. Invyr Holy Panda
An in-depth look at the Zuoce Bubblegum and the Invyr Holy Panda switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The Zuoce Bubblegum switch, a linear switch, is a striking offering from Gold Grain with two eye-catching colorways. It provides a satisfyingly clacky typing experience, making it a prime choice for keyboard enthusiasts looking to explore the innovative frontier of their hobby. On the other hand, the Invyr Holy Panda switch, a tactile switch, is known for its sharp tactility and satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. With a blend of pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance, it stands unmatched in the hearts of tactile switch enthusiasts. While the Bubblegum switch is categorized as 'Clacky' and 'Bouncy', the Holy Panda switch is categorized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', and 'Snappy'. Each switch offers a unique typing experience, but to best decide on the ideal switch for you, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM+SL
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Zuoce Bubblegum and the Invyr Holy Panda switches offer distinct sound profiles due to the use of different materials. The Bubblegum's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the Holy Panda's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and higher-pitched sound. Similarly, both switches feature nylon bottom housings that result in a deeper and fuller sound profile. However, the Bubblegum's nylon bottom housing absorbs more sound than the Holy Panda's, creating a duller and rounder sound.
In terms of aesthetics, the use of polycarbonate in the Holy Panda's top housing allows for RGB lighting to shine through, adding a visual appeal to the switch. On the other hand, the Bubblegum's POM top housing may not offer the same level of visual customization. Both switches utilize nylon bottom housings, which are classic switch housing materials known for their sound absorption properties. This results in a similar deep and full sound profile for both switches, with the nuances of the top housing material providing the main differences in sound.
When considering the impact of the housing materials on the overall typing experience, it's important to note that the qualities of each housing material are split between the top and bottom of the switch. The bottom housing plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the key, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing the key. This means that the POM top housing of the Bubblegum and the polycarbonate top housing of the Holy Panda will have different effects on the typing experience, providing users with unique tactile and auditory feedback.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch differ significantly. The Bubblegum has a light actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a lighter option overall. On the other hand, the Holy Panda has an unknown actuation force but a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams, providing a more substantial typing experience. Those who prefer a lighter touch may favor the Bubblegum for longer typing sessions, while those who enjoy a more robust push feel may opt for the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, we can see that the Bubblegum has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Holy Panda has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This means that the Bubblegum will require less force and distance to actuate compared to the Holy Panda. For those who value fast response times, the Bubblegum may be the preferred choice due to its shorter travel distance. On the other hand, the Holy Panda may be more suitable for users who prefer a deeper key press feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style. Both switches offer different experiences due to their varying travel distances, but users can expect a similar level of performance from both if they are comfortable with the specific travel distance of each switch.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Zuoce Bubblegum has an MSRP of $3.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Bubblegum for $2.30.
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch is known for its clacky nature, producing a sharp and snappy sound that can be described as crisp, bright, and percussive. On the other hand, the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch's sound qualities are not specified in the provided information, so it is difficult to make a direct comparison. However, it is worth noting that the sound of a switch is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used, so the overall sound experience may vary depending on the setup.
In terms of feel, the Bubblegum switch is described as bouncy, providing a spring-like and elastic feedback sensation that gives the keys a lively feel with rebound when pressed. In contrast, the Invyr Holy Panda switch is described as accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy, showcasing pronounced feedback, moderate to firm actuation force, a crisp tactile bump, and super responsiveness. The Holy Panda offers a different tactile experience compared to the Bubblegum, with a more prominent and defined tactility that is neither overwhelming nor subtle, creating an immersive and reactive typing sensation.
Overall, while the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch offer distinct experiences in terms of sound and feel, both switches cater to keyboard enthusiasts seeking a satisfying typing experience. Whether you prefer the clacky and bouncy nature of the Bubblegum or the sharp and invigorating feedback of the Holy Panda, both switches have their unique qualities that can enhance your typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preferences in sound, feel, and typing style.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing style. If you prefer a lighter and bouncy typing experience with a clacky sound, the Bubblegum switch may be the perfect choice for you. However, if you enjoy a medium-heavy switch with pronounced, sharp tactility and a snappy, invigorating feel, the Holy Panda switch is likely more your speed. Consider the sound and feel descriptions provided and choose the switch that aligns best with your preferences and typing needs. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences in the mechanical keyboard community.
Mentioned in this article
