Gateron CJ vs. HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U
An in-depth look at the Gateron CJ and the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron CJ and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U mechanical keyboard switches, it becomes apparent that both switches offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The CJ is well-loved for its higher-pitched clacks and smooth push feel, making typing on it a truly enjoyable experience. On the other hand, the Hyacinth V2U stands out with its fuller 3.9mm travel distance and bouncy 22mm spring, providing a nod to traditional typing experiences while incorporating modern elements. The CJ is categorized as 'Chirpy', 'Neutral', 'Mild', 'Low-pitched', 'Thocky' whereas the Hyacinth V2U is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Polished', 'Silky', 'Subdued'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal, making them suitable for different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
52g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.90 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The Gateron CJ and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U both offer unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The CJ utilizes a proprietary INK blend for its top housing, which results in a satisfying thin and higher-pitched sound, often described as clacky. In contrast, the Hyacinth V2U features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. While both materials offer a clear and resonant sound, the CJ's sound may lean towards a slightly softer tone compared to the Hyacinth V2U's more defined sound.
Moving on to the bottom housing materials, the CJ incorporates a POM housing that creates a deeper and relatively more muted sound profile. On the other hand, the Hyacinth V2U utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which elicits a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. The CJ's POM housing may provide a more subtle typing experience compared to the bolder sound produced by the nylon bottom housing of the Hyacinth V2U.
In conclusion, while the Gateron CJ and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U offer contrasting housing materials, they both bring their own unique qualities to the table. The CJ's blend of INK in the top housing creates a slightly softer and clacky sound, while the POM bottom housing adds a muted depth. In comparison, the Hyacinth V2U's polycarbonate top housing delivers a sharper and crisper sound, complemented by the fuller and rounder sound produced by the nylon bottom housing. Ultimately, users can expect a distinct typing experience with each switch based on the housing materials chosen.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch, we can see that the CJ has a slightly heavier actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Hyacinth V2U's 45 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the CJ requires 60 grams, whereas the Hyacinth V2U only needs 52 grams. Both switches fall into the medium category in terms of actuation force, but the Hyacinth V2U is on the lighter side when it comes to bottom out force, making it more suited for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. The CJ, on the other hand, provides a slightly heavier feel when fully pressed. Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preference in terms of typing feel and weight preference.
Travel distance
Comparing the travel distances of the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch, the CJ has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Hyacinth V2U's 3.9 mm. While the 0.1 mm difference may seem insignificant, it can make a noticeable impact on the typing or gaming experience for some users. Gamers looking for faster response times may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Hyacinth V2U, while those who enjoy a more substantial key press may lean towards the CJ. Both switches offer a comfortable and responsive typing experience, so ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CJ for $5.35.
The HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U for $2.91.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gateron CJ linear switch offers a chirpy and high-pitched sound, giving it a unique acoustic signature that sets it apart from other switches. On the other hand, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch produces a softer, bassier sound due to being crafted from nylon. While the CJ provides a more distinct and lively sound with its chirpy nature, the V2Us offer a more subdued and mellow tone, catering to those who prefer a quieter typing experience.
When it comes to feel, the Gateron CJ linear switch provides an impossibly smooth push feel, offering a mild typing experience that is approachable to most users. In contrast, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch features a fuller travel distance of 3.9mm and a 22mm spring, providing a bouncier feel. The V2Us also boast a polished and silky finish, ensuring a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and minimized resistance.
Overall, the Gateron CJ linear switch is characterized by its chirpy sound and mild typing feel, while the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch presents a softer, bassier sound and a bouncier, polished feel. Both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences in terms of sound and feel. Depending on whether you prefer a more distinct and lively typing experience or a quieter and smoother one, you can choose between the CJ and V2U switches to achieve your desired results.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you are looking for a unique and enjoyable linear switch with a medium bottom out force and distinctive higher-pitched clacks, the CJ may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a fuller travel distance, softer bassier sound signature, and added bounciness with a medium-light bottom out force, the Hyacinth V2U could be the better option. Additionally, if you appreciate a switch with a chirpy or low-pitched sound profile, you may lean towards the CJ, while a neutral or subdued sound profile may attract you to the Hyacinth V2U. Lastly, if you value a mild typing experience or are seeking a switch with a polished or silky finish for smooth key travel, the CJ or Hyacinth V2U respectively may be the ideal fit for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences and typing style to find the perfect match for your mechanical keyboard setup.
Mentioned in this article
