HMX EVA vs. KTT Kang White

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, enthusiasts often find themselves torn between options that offer distinct advantages tailored to different typing experiences. The HMX EVA, inspired by the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01, stands out for its resonant sound signature and silky smooth typing feel, making it a delightful choice for those who value aesthetics alongside performance. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White presents itself as a poppy linear switch with a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness thanks to its self-lubricating material. While both switches fall within the linear category, the EVA captivates with its striking sound profile, while the Kang White offers an exceptional typing experience through its unique construction. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX EVA Linear

KTT Kang White Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

$1.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX EVA and the KTT Kang White, it becomes evident that they each utilize distinct materials for their top housings, which in turn affects their resultant sound profiles. The EVA features a nylon top housing, known for its ability to absorb sound and deliver a deeper, fuller auditory experience. This characteristic is due to nylon's softer plastic properties, which create a more muted sound. Conversely, the Kang White utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which offers a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. The rigidity of polycarbonate enhances resonance, resulting in a clearer and crisper acoustic output. Thus, while both switches provide quality sound experiences, the EVA leans towards a more subdued resonance, whereas the Kang White presents a brighter and more pronounced auditory tone.

In terms of the bottom housing, both switches utilize nylon, which brings a layer of consistency in sound and tactile feedback. The nylon bottom housing in the EVA and the KTT Kang White replicates the deeper and fuller sound profile associated with the softness of nylon, allowing for muted auditory feedback during key presses. This shared material can create a similar bottom-out experience when typing on both switches, providing a satisfying and plush feel. Consequently, while the top housings diverge in their materials and the sounds they produce, the uniformity in the nylon bottom housing ensures that users will experience a comparable tactile sensation and a cohesive auditory experience at the lower end of the actuation.

Overall, the differences in top housing materials between the HMX EVA and KTT Kang White create distinct sound signatures, but both switches share the nylon bottom housing, which balances out the differences and offers a unified tactile sensation. Users seeking a pronounced sound profile will be drawn to the Kang White's polycarbonate top, while those preferring a more muted auditory experience will appreciate the EVA's nylon housing. Regardless, the nylon bottom housing acts as a common thread that ties the two experiences together, allowing for a satisfying result in terms of tactile feedback and deeper sound dynamics when bottoming out.

Weight

When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, there are notable differences that cater to various user preferences. The HMX EVA switch has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, making it well-suited for those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions or gaming marathons. In contrast, the KTT Kang White switch features a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, appealing to users who enjoy a more substantial push feel while typing. As a result, the EVA is the lighter option, providing a smoother experience, while the Kang White is the heavier switch, offering a more tactile response. This difference in force could influence a user's choice based on their typing style and comfort level, as those accustomed to lighter switches may find the Kang White's medium force less favorable for extended use.

Travel distance

The HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch exhibit distinct travel distances, measuring 3.6 mm and 4 mm, respectively. This difference highlights a key contrast in their design: the EVA with its shorter travel distance offers a more responsive feel, which can cater to gamers seeking quicker actuation for faster response times. On the other hand, the Kang White, with its longer travel distance, provides a more pronounced depth that some users may find preferable for a more tactile experience. Therefore, if you prioritize responsiveness, the EVA would be the better choice, while those who enjoy a deeper keystroke might lean towards the Kang White. Overall, the EVA offers a shorter travel distance compared to the longer travel distance of the Kang White.

Price comparison

Typing experience

The HMX EVA linear switch features a resonant sound signature, making it distinctive among its peers, while the KTT Kang White is noted for a dazzling typing sound that can be characterized as low-pitched and neutral. The EVA's sound profile is likely to provide a more bass-heavy and slightly mellow auditory experience, contrasting with the Kang White's balanced tone that resonates well in various settings, be it at home or in a professional environment. It's essential to remember that the sound from either switch can greatly depend on factors like the keyboard design and keycap material, but the EVA’s resonant quality sets it apart regarding overall auditory experience.

When it comes to feel, the EVA is renowned for its silky smooth typing experience, delivering a continual and seamless journey across the keypress. This smoothness contributes to a pleasant tactile sensation that encourages long typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White also promises unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material, which enhances comfort and reduces friction during typing. Both switches, while potentially offering different nuances, provide a comforting and seamless experience that encourages fluid typing.

In summary, while the HMX EVA and KTT Kang White linear switches both excel in delivering smooth typing experiences, they differ in their sound profiles—with the EVA offering a resonant and bass-heavy characteristic and the Kang White providing a more neutral, balanced tone. Regardless of these differences, users can expect a high-quality sensory experience from either switch, with the EVA likely appealing to those who appreciate a more unique auditory presence, while the Kang White caters to those who prefer versatility across various environments.

Conclusion

To conclude, your choice between the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and what you prioritize in your typing experience. If you prefer a lighter bottom-out force for a more effortless keystroke and appreciate a unique sound signature that resonates beautifully—perhaps inspired by the evocative design of Evangelion Unit-01—the EVA would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you lean towards a more substantial keystroke that provides a bit more resistance with a bottom-out force of 58 grams, and you value a smooth, low-pitched typing sound enhanced by self-lubricating materials, the Kang White is likely more suited to your needs. Their differing sound profiles and feel will cater to different typing styles and environments, so consider where and how you'll be using your keyboard. Whether you want a playful touch with the HMX EVA or a refined experience with the KTT Kang White, your comfort and enjoyment should guide your decision.

Mentioned in this article

HMX EVA Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more

KTT Kang White Linear

$1.99 per 10

Learn more