KTT F2 vs. HMX Macchiato
An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the HMX Macchiato switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT F2 and HMX Macchiato both offer unique characteristics tailored to different typing preferences. The KTT F2 stands out with its distinct hollow sound signature, providing a subtle auditory profile that may appeal to those who seek a quieter typing experience. Its medium-light weight strikes a balance between ease of use and tactile feedback, enhanced by a lightly textured surface that adds a sense of refinement to each keystroke. Conversely, the HMX Macchiato, developed by YG Studio, caters to enthusiasts who prioritize a silky smooth typing sensation coupled with a bright, engaging sound profile. This switch underscores a fluidity that is often preferred for fast-paced or gaming environments. Ultimately, both switches present distinct advantages—whether you're drawn to the subdued yet satisfying texture of the KTT F2 or the enchanting smoothness of the HMX Macchiato. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The KTT F2 and the HMX Macchiato differ significantly in their choice of housing materials, leading to distinct auditory experiences for users. The F2 utilizes polycarbonate for both its top and bottom housings, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This stiffness allows for a more resonant sound, making it particularly appealing for users who enjoy a clear auditory feedback when typing. The translucency of polycarbonate also enhances the aesthetic appeal, especially in conjunction with RGB lighting, allowing for vibrant illumination through the housing. In contrast, the Macchiato employs nylon for both its top and bottom housings, which offers a distinctively different acoustic experience. Nylon is a softer material, which absorbs sound more effectively, leading to a deeper and fuller sound profile. This can provide a more muted auditory experience that some users may prefer for its smoothness and rounded tones.
When it comes to the impact of these materials on the overall keyboard experience, the differences between the KTT F2 and HMX Macchiato become more pronounced. The F2's dual polycarbonate construction maintains the same bright sound throughout the typing process, so when you press a key, you'll receive a consistent auditory feedback reflective of its stiffer properties. This contributes to a lively and engaging typing experience, especially when each keystroke resonates with clarity. Meanwhile, the Macchiato’s nylon constructions bring a more pronounced difference between the sound profiles created by each housing. The softer nylon material absorbs vibrations better, which influences the typing feel. Pressing a key produces a distinct sound that is rich and full, while releasing the key creates a softer sound that emphasizes the switch's design.
Ultimately, while both the KTT F2 and HMX Macchiato utilize different materials for their sound profiles and aesthetic qualities, they can be expected to yield similar results in terms of performance and user satisfaction, albeit in contrasting ways. Both switches are designed to offer engaging tactile feedback, and the distinct sound profiles of each can cater to different preferences. Users seeking a sharper and more vibrant auditory experience may lean towards the F2 with its polycarbonate housing, while those who prefer a more subdued and deeper sound might find the Macchiato's nylon construction more appealing. Thus, despite their material differences, both switches fulfill the essential purpose of providing an enjoyable typing experience, showcasing how housing materials can distinctly shape user interaction with mechanical switches.
Weight
When comparing the KTT F2 linear switch and the HMX Macchiato linear switch, notable differences in actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The KTT F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, classifying it as medium-light. In contrast, the HMX Macchiato features a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a lower bottom out force of 50 grams, designating it as a lightweight option. This means that, while the differences in actuation force are minimal, users will find the Macchiato easier to press down, making it more suitable for those who prioritize prolonged typing sessions. The bottom out force of the F2 is slightly heavier, offering a more substantial feel for users who enjoy a stronger push experience. Overall, while both switches provide a relatively light typing experience, the KTT F2 is the heavier switch, appealing to those who appreciate additional resistance, whereas the HMX Macchiato caters to users seeking a lighter touch.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT F2 linear switch and the HMX Macchiato linear switch, we find that they differ significantly. The F2 switch features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it a shorter option conducive to quick response times, which is often favored by gamers. In contrast, the HMX Macchiato has a longer travel distance of 4 mm, providing a more pronounced feel that some users may prefer for a richer typing experience. For those who appreciate depth in their keystrokes, the Macchiato's additional half millimeter offers a more satisfying tactile feedback. Therefore, if you prioritize speed and responsiveness in your typing or gaming, the KTT F2 would be the better choice, while the HMX Macchiato caters to those who desire a more traditional and deep keystroke.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Macchiato has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Macchiato for $2.99.
The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT F2 linear switch sets itself apart with its distinct hollow sound signature, which introduces a unique auditory depth to typing. It is characterized as having a neutral sound profile, making it versatile for various environments, from home to an office. Additionally, the subdued quality of the F2 results in a dampened sound when pressed, providing a subtle auditory experience that won’t disrupt those around you. In contrast, the HMX Macchiato linear switch is recognized for its bright sound profile; however, specific descriptors regarding its sound characteristics are not provided, leaving an unknown aspect when it comes to how it compares to the F2's nuanced auditory signature.
Feeling the switches under your fingers presents a noteworthy contrast between the F2 and the Macchiato, with the F2 excelling in delivering a feathery and mild tactile experience. The light actuation force required by the F2 reduces finger fatigue, making it ideal for long typing sessions and enhancing user comfort. This switch also has a subtly textured feel that adds dimension to each keystroke, striking a balance between comfort and touch feedback. However, the specific characteristics of the Macchiato's feel are not detailed, leaving its tactile nuances unspecified and preventing a direct comparison with the F2’s tactile qualities.
Overall, both the KTT F2 and HMX Macchiato linear switches cater to different auditory and tactile preferences. The F2 offers a subdued yet nuanced auditory experience combined with a light and feathery touch, making it approachable for all users. The Macchiato, on the other hand, promises a silky smooth typing experience with a bright sound profile, but lacks detail in its described qualities. As a newcomer, exploring both options can provide a rewarding typing experience, especially given that the aspects of sound and feel may vary depending on your keyboard setup and personal taste. Ultimately, if you're looking for a comfortable and quiet typing experience, the F2 is an excellent choice, while the Macchiato may appeal to those who prioritize a smoother feel and brighter sound.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the KTT F2 linear switch and the HMX Macchiato linear switch should be guided by your specific preferences and typing habits. If you find enjoyment in a balance of auditory and tactile sensations, the KTT F2 may be more suitable for you. Its unique hollow sound signature offers a slightly subdued auditory experience, while the medium-light bottom-out force provides a comfortable typing feel without much strain on your fingers. This makes it an excellent option for a mix of gaming and typing environments, whether at home or in an office setting where some noise is acceptable but not overwhelming. On the other hand, if you prioritize a silky smooth typing experience and the softest keystrokes with minimal auditory distraction, the HMX Macchiato is likely a better fit. The lighter bottom-out force combined with its bright sound profile facilitates effortless typing, making it ideal for long typing sessions or collaborative workspaces where you wish to maintain a quieter atmosphere. Ultimately, it comes down to whether you prefer a touch of tactile feedback with auditory nuance or a seamless, smooth experience that quietly glides beneath your fingertips.
Mentioned in this article
