HMX FJ400 vs. Jwick Taro

Overview

When it comes to selecting the ideal mechanical keyboard switch, the choice often comes down to personal preference, particularly between linear and tactile switches. The HMX FJ400 stands out as a well-rounded linear switch, offering a balanced sound profile that caters to those who favor a smooth and uninterrupted typing experience. This makes it an excellent option for gamers and typists who value speed and precision over tactile feedback. In contrast, the Jwick Taro presents a lovely tactile experience, complete with a snappy, medium-level tactility and a satisfying, crisp sound with each keystroke. This makes the Taro a delightful choice for users who enjoy a more pronounced feedback when typing, enhancing the overall feel of their keyboard. Ultimately, while both switches offer distinct advantages—smoothness and speed with the FJ400, and tactile responsiveness with the Taro—let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX FJ400 Linear

Jwick Taro Tactile

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$5.50

$4.25 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX FJ400 and the Jwick Taro, one notable difference lies in their top housing materials: POM for the FJ400 and polycarbonate for the Taro. POM, or polyoxymethylene, is known for producing a sound profile that is deeper and more muted, creating a unique auditory experience that emphasizes warmth. In contrast, the polycarbonate top housing of the Taro contributes to a higher-pitched and crisper sound profile, largely due to the inherent stiffness of the material that enhances resonance and clarity. This distinction in materials leads to different sound qualities when typing, with the FJ400 offering a more subdued experience compared to the brighter tone of the Taro.

However, both switches feature a nylon bottom housing, which serves as the classic material for mechanical switch for its ability to absorb sound. As a result, both the FJ400 and Taro deliver a deeper and fuller sound profile during typing, as the nylon housing dampens the vibrations and reduces harshness. Since the bottom housing has a significant impact on the overall sound and feel when bottoming out, users can expect a similar depth in auditory feedback regardless of the substantial difference in their top housing materials. This shared element allows both switches to maintain a consistent typing experience characterized by warmth and softness during key presses.

Ultimately, the combination of distinct top housing materials and a shared nylon bottom housing results in a unique interplay of sound profiles for each switch. While the FJ400 may provide a more muted and rounded sound due to its POM top housing, the sharper tone produced by the polycarbonate housing of the Taro creates a different typing sensation. Users seeking to balance the influences of both the top and bottom housings will find that, despite their differing top materials, the nylon bottom ensures that both switches remain grounded in the classic, fuller typing feel that mechanical keyboards are known for. Thus, one's auditory preferences ultimately dictate whether the warmer or brighter sound profile is more appealing, showcasing the distinct advantages of each design.

Weight

When comparing the HMX FJ400 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, there are notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces that cater to different typing preferences. The FJ400 features an actuation force of 50 grams, which makes it lighter than the Taro's unknown actuation force, but its bottom out force is significantly lower at 58 grams compared to the Taro's bottom out force of 67 grams, indicating that the Taro provides a heavier feel overall. This difference suggests that while the FJ400 may be easier to actuate, the Taro offers a more substantial push, appealing to users who prefer tactile feedback. Consequently, typists or gamers who enjoy a lighter switch might gravitate towards the FJ400 for longer typing sessions, while those who favor a firmer response might opt for the Taro despite its heavier bottoming out force. Ultimately, the choice comes down to personal preference in typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX FJ400 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, the FJ400 has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Taro has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.7 mm. This indicates that, although both switches fall within the shorter travel distance category, the FJ400 offers a more pronounced depth with its additional 0.1 mm. Gamers might appreciate the Taro switch's quicker actuation due to its shorter travel distance, which can enhance responsiveness during gameplay. On the other hand, someone who enjoys a more substantial feel while typing might prefer the HMX FJ400 due to its deeper travel distance, resulting in a more tactile experience. Thus, while both switches cater to modern preferences for shorter travel distances, the FJ400 provides a bit more depth compared to the Taro, which could influence user choice based on individual preferences.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX FJ400 linear switch is known for a balanced sound profile that provides a moderate acoustic experience while typing, making it versatile for various environments—ideal for those who appreciate a more neutral sound. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro tactile switch produces acute and crisp clacks, adding a lively auditory signature to key presses. The Taro switches' sound is particularly notable for being neither too loud nor overly soft, striking a balance that allows them to fit comfortably in both work and home settings.

In terms of feel, the FJ400 offers a smooth typing experience typical of linear switches, providing consistent resistance without tactile feedback at the actuation point. Comparatively, the Taro switches deliver a unique experience with their combination of buttery smoothness and a stepped tactile response. This means that while the Taro offers a noticeable tactile bump that can be felt during the key press, it does so in a manner that is less jarring than hypertactile switches, delivering a blend of pre-travel feedback and seamless keystrokes.

Overall, both switches cater to slightly different preferences. The FJ400 is an excellent choice for those seeking a smooth typing experience without much auditory distraction, while the Jwick Taro caters to users who enjoy a tactile sensation with playful sound dynamics. Choosing between them largely depends on whether you prioritize auditory feedback or a tactile feel in your typing experience.

Conclusion

To wrap up, when deciding between the HMX FJ400 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, your choice should align with your typing preferences and usage context. If you prefer a smooth, uninterrupted typing experience with a balanced sound profile, the FJ400 is an excellent choice, especially for those who want a medium actuation force that strikes a good balance and can be comfortable for prolonged use. Its design makes it suitable for both gaming and typing, catering to a variety of tasks without overwhelming your auditory senses. On the other hand, if you enjoy a tactile feedback with a snappy response and a slightly heavier actuation force, the Taro is the way to go. Its unique ‘buttery’ feel and stepped tactile feedback provide a satisfying sensation that enhances typing accuracy, ideal for writers or those who appreciate a bit of texture with their keystrokes. Furthermore, the Taro is characterized by its crisp acoustics, making it a great option for environments where sound matters, allowing you to enjoy typing without disturbing others. Ultimately, your choice depends on whether you prioritize a smooth, linear experience or a tactile and auditory engagement while you type.

Mentioned in this article

HMX FJ400 Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

Jwick Taro Tactile

$5.50

$4.25 per 10

Learn more