HMX FJ400 vs. Wuque Studio WS Dash
An in-depth look at the HMX FJ400 and the Wuque Studio WS Dash switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When delving into the world of mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX FJ400 and the Wuque Studio WS Dash stand out as two compelling choices that cater to distinct preferences and typing experiences. The FJ400, nestled comfortably in the middle of the HMX Film switch lineup, is celebrated for its balanced sound profile, making it an excellent option for users who crave a harmonious auditory experience without excessive noise. On the other hand, the WS Dash, a remarkable re-color of the acclaimed Magnetic Jade, showcases a vibrant and clacky sound signature, perfect for those who appreciate a lively typing ambiance and the enjoyment of a silky smooth keystroke, thanks to its innovative Hall Effect technology. Each switch offers its unique strengths: the FJ400’s versatility appeals to users seeking stability and consistency, while the WS Dash provides a more dynamic and rich sound for those who prioritize character and flair in their typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs and preferences.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
30g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
3.80 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX FJ400 and the Wuque Studio WS Dash, a notable contrast emerges from their top housing components. The FJ400 features a polyoxymethylene (POM) top housing, which is known for producing a unique sound profile that leans toward the deeper end of the spectrum while maintaining a muted quality. This characteristic inherently creates a smoother auditory experience, appealing to those who prefer a more subdued sound while typing. In contrast, the WS Dash utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, renowned for its ability to generate a sharper and more vibrant sound profile. The stiffness of polycarbonate allows for greater clarity and resonance, courtesy of its ability to project sound, which is particularly advantageous in setups featuring RGB lighting due to its translucent nature. Therefore, users can anticipate distinctly different audio feedback while typing on these switches, with the FJ400 offering a more rounded sound in comparison to the crisper tones produced by the WS Dash.
Both the FJ400 and WS Dash share a similarity in their bottom housing, as both employ nylon. This classic material is revered for its its ability to deliver a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, which absorbs more sound than harder plastics. Consequently, regardless of the differences in their top housings, both switches provide a consistent bottom-out feel that resonates with a duller and rounder sound. This consistency is particularly important to typists who appreciate a solid and pleasant acoustic response while engaging with their keyboards. Hence, while the top housing materials instigate different sound characteristics, the nylon bottom housing harmonizes their sound experiences, ensuring that both switches can produce a satisfying auditory response when pressed down.
Overall, the interplay between the different housing materials in the HMX FJ400 and Wuque Studio WS Dash highlights a fascinating balance between design and acoustics. While the FJ400's POM top lends itself to a deeper, more muted sound, and the WS Dash’s polycarbonate top accentuates higher-pitched, crisper sounds, their shared nylon bottom housing reconciles these differences, resulting in a fuller typing experience. This variance showcases how different materials can cater to distinct preferences while still allowing for a coherent overall sound when utilized. The result is that users can enjoy their unique auditory profile, whether they opt for the FJ400 or the WS Dash, demonstrating how thoughtful design choices in switch materials can create a wide range of tactile and acoustic experiences.
Weight
When comparing the HMX FJ400 linear switch to the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch, notable differences emerge in their actuation and bottom out forces. The FJ400 has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, indicating a medium resistance that's more suitable for those who enjoy a substantial typing experience. In contrast, the WS Dash features a lighter actuation force of 30 grams and a slightly lower bottom out force of 55 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. This lighter feel is ideal for users seeking comfort during prolonged use, making it a great choice for long working hours or intense gaming sessions. Consequently, while both switches provide a satisfying typing experience, the FJ400 leans towards a heftier feel, appealing to those who prefer a more tactile feedback, while the WS Dash caters to those who prioritize a lighter and more effortless keystroke. Overall, users will find that their choice between the two switches hinges on personal preference toward key weight and typing dynamics.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX FJ400 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch, the FJ400 features a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the WS Dash has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the FJ400 provides a more pronounced key press, giving users a deeper feel, which may be preferable for those who enjoy more tactile feedback. In contrast, the WS Dash’s shorter travel distance allows for quicker actuation, making it a suitable choice for gamers seeking faster response times. While both switches offer modern travel distances that cater to different preferences, if you favor a more responsive experience, the WS Dash might be the ideal option. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches comes down to personal preference for depth versus speed.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX FJ400 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the FJ400 for $3.29.
The Wuque Studio WS Dash has an MSRP of $8.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Dash for $7.49.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the HMX FJ400 linear switch is characterized by a balanced tonal quality, making it a versatile option that can complement a wide range of setups without overwhelming the auditory senses. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Dash hall effect switch, while also delivering a pleasant auditory experience, is noted for its bright and clacky sound signature, providing a vibrant acoustic presence that can enhance the typing experience. Both switches' sound is influenced by external factors like the keyboard construction and keycap material, but the FJ400 will generally offer a more subdued sound compared to the lively tones of the WS Dash.
When it comes to feel, the FJ400 linear switch is recognized for its smooth keystrokes, providing a satisfying and consistent experience with each press. This switch is ideal for those who prioritize a linear actuation with minimal resistance. Meanwhile, the WS Dash excels in delivering a silky smooth keystroke, thanks to its hall effect technology, combining responsiveness with an exceptionally fluid typing experience. While both switches offer smoothness, the tactile feedback differs, with the WS Dash potentially providing a unique sensation due to its different actuation method.
Overall, both the HMX FJ400 and the Wuque Studio WS Dash switches present compelling options for different types of users. The FJ400's balanced sound and consistent feel make it a reliable choice for general use, while the WS Dash stands out with its vibrant acoustics and a smooth typing experience that elevates the act of typing. Depending on your preferences for sound and feel, you can choose between a more understated and versatile option or one that adds a lively character to your keyboard setup. Ultimately, either switch can yield an enjoyable typing experience, with nuances that cater to various typing styles and auditory preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX FJ400 linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Dash Hall Effect switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you prefer a slightly heavier but still balanced switch with a bottom-out force of 58 grams, the FJ400 is an excellent option, especially if you're looking for a solid middle ground in terms of sound and feel. Known for its balanced sound profile, this switch minimizes distractions and is ideal for both typing and gaming, making it a versatile choice for various use cases. On the other hand, if you’re drawn to a lighter touch with a bottom-out force of 55 grams, the WS Dash will suit you well, particularly if you value a lively and clacky sound signature combined with a silky smooth keystroke. This makes it an appealing option for those who enjoy an acoustically engaging experience alongside responsive performance. In the end, consider what aspects matter most for your typing or gaming needs, and choose the switch that aligns with your desired experience.
Mentioned in this article
