United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red vs. Outemu Lotus

An in-depth look at the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus mechanical keyboard switches, both are linear switches, but they offer different features to cater to different preferences. The G Pro 3.0 Red is known for its budget-friendly nature and smooth typing experience, with a medium-light actuation force that strikes a balance between responsiveness and ease of use. It also boasts a frosted light diffuser for vibrant RGB lighting effects and a medium-high pitch for a satisfying auditory experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus does not have specific standout features mentioned but may appeal to those looking for a basic linear switch. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

35g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.30 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

20.5mm lengthened stainless steel spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus, it is evident that both switches utilize nylon for their bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, which absorbs more sound than harder plastics. This results in a duller and rounder sound when typing on switches that use nylon. Therefore, both the G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus will offer a similar typing experience in terms of sound when it comes to their bottom housing material.

However, when it comes to the top housing material, the G Pro 3.0 Red features a polycarbonate housing while the Outemu Lotus utilizes nylon. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, resulting in a more clear and resonant sound. On the other hand, nylon creates a deeper and fuller sound profile, absorbing more sound and producing a duller and rounder sound. This means that the G Pro 3.0 Red will offer a different sound experience compared to the Outemu Lotus due to the difference in their top housing materials.

Overall, the housing materials used in the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus play a significant role in the sound profile of each switch. While both switches share nylon as the material for the bottom housing, providing a similar typing experience in terms of sound, the differences in their top housing materials result in distinct sound profiles. The G Pro 3.0 Red, with its polycarbonate top housing, will offer a sharper and crisper sound, while the Outemu Lotus, with its nylon top housing, will provide a deeper and fuller sound. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on the user's preference for sound profile and typing experience.

Weight

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch both offer a light typing experience, with the G Pro 3.0 Red having an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, and the Lotus having an actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Lotus requires slightly less force to initiate a keystroke, which may be preferable for those looking for a lighter touch. However, both switches have the same bottom out force, providing a consistent typing feel when fully pressed. Ultimately, those who prefer a lighter keystroke may lean towards the Lotus, while those who prefer a slightly more substantial typing experience may gravitate towards the G Pro 3.0 Red.

Travel distance

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is considered a more traditional length. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm. This means that the G Pro 3.0 Red has a longer travel distance compared to the Lotus switch. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the Lotus switch due to its shorter travel distance. However, individuals who enjoy a deeper key press may opt for the G Pro 3.0 Red with its slightly longer travel distance. Both switches offer unique experiences based on their travel distances, so choosing between them ultimately comes down to personal preference.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Red for $2.77.

The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch is known for having a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for a wide range of users. This switch provides a moderate auditory experience that is not too loud or too quiet, allowing for a satisfying typing sound without being disruptive. On the other hand, information about the sound profile of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is not available. It's important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

When it comes to feel, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switch offers a creamy and polished typing experience. With a smooth and buttery feel, this switch allows for effortless keystrokes and reduced friction, resulting in a sleek and refined typing experience. Additionally, the G Pro Red switch provides a mild and silky sensation, enhancing the overall smoothness of typing and minimizing resistance. Conversely, details regarding the feel of the Outemu Lotus linear switch are currently unknown.

Overall, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch stands out for its balanced actuation force, vibrant RGB lighting effects, and satisfying auditory experience. With a smooth and creamy feel, this budget-friendly switch is a great option for those looking to elevate their typing performance without breaking the bank. While information about the Outemu Lotus linear switch is limited, it's possible to achieve similar results in sound and feel with both switches when paired with the right keyboard and keycap combination. Ultimately, the choice between the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red and the Outemu Lotus will depend on personal preferences and desired typing experience.

Conclusion

In closing, if you are looking for a budget-friendly linear switch with a smooth typing experience and medium-light actuation force, then the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch would be a great choice for you. It offers a balanced mix of responsiveness and ease of use, along with vibrant RGB lighting effects and a satisfying auditory experience. On the other hand, if you prioritize a creamy, mild, polished, or silky typing experience without breaking the bank, the Outemu Lotus linear switch might be the better option for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your preferences for actuation force, sound profile, and typing feel. Both switches have their own unique features and advantages, so choose the one that best suits your typing style and preferences.

Mentioned in this article