KTT Matcha vs. Outemu Lotus
An in-depth look at the KTT Matcha and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Matcha and the Outemu Lotus offer unique typing experiences. The Matcha is celebrated for its tactile feedback, providing users with a satisfying and responsive typing sensation. On the other hand, the Lotus is a linear switch, offering a smooth keystroke without any tactile bump. While the Matcha appeals to those who enjoy a more pronounced typing feel with a crisp bottom-out sound, the Lotus may be preferred by those seeking a quieter, more consistent typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Matcha and the Outemu Lotus, the use of polycarbonate in the Matcha's top and bottom housings creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile compared to the Lotus's nylon housing, which elicits a deeper and fuller sound. Polycarbonate's stiffness leads to a more clear and resonant sound profile, whereas nylon's softer nature absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound. Aesthetically, polycarbonate's translucency makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, while nylon is a classic switch housing material known for its performance.
While the Matcha utilizes both polycarbonate top and bottom housings, the Lotus features nylon top and bottom housings, offering distinct sound profiles for each aspect of typing on the switches. The differences in material properties between polycarbonate and nylon result in a noticeable variation in sound profiles, with the Matcha showcasing a sharper and crisper sound compared to the Lotus's deeper and fuller sound. Both housing materials bring unique qualities to the switches, catering to different preferences in sound and feel for mechanical keyboard users.
Overall, the choice between the KTT Matcha and the Outemu Lotus housing materials ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and feel. The polycarbonate housing of the Matcha delivers a sharper and crisper typing experience, especially when paired with RGB lighting, while the nylon housing of the Lotus offers a deeper and fuller sound profile. Whether one prefers the clear and resonant qualities of polycarbonate or the absorbing nature of nylon, both switches provide different tactile experiences that cater to individual preferences in mechanical key switches.
Weight
The KTT Matcha tactile switch has a slightly lighter actuation force of 40 grams compared to the Outemu Lotus linear switch, which has an actuation force of 35 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Matcha is also lighter at 45 grams, while the Lotus has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 50 grams. Both switches have relatively light actuation forces, making them suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch when typing or gaming for extended periods. The slight difference in bottom out force between the two switches may result in a slightly different typing experience, with the Lotus providing a bit more resistance when fully pressing down the key. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the individual's preference for a lighter or slightly heavier typing feel.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is clear that the Matcha has a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Lotus has a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm. The Matcha's travel distance falls within the realm of traditional switch distances, providing a more substantial key press feel, which may be preferred by some users. On the other hand, the Lotus offers a shallower travel distance, which can be advantageous for those seeking quicker response times, such as gamers. Both switches offer unique advantages based on their travel distances, catering to different preferences among users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for key press depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Matcha tactile switch is known for its clacky nature, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, creating a crisp, bright, and percussive sound that is satisfying to many typists. On the other hand, information about the Outemu Lotus linear switch sound quality is currently not available. It's important to note that the sound produced by a switch is also influenced by other factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the KTT Matcha tactile switch is described as stepped, snappy, accented, feathery, and subtle, offering a unique typing experience with a blend of tactile feedback and responsiveness. The stepped nature of the switch provides a two-stage feel, while the snappiness adds a lively touch to each keystroke. Additionally, the feathery and subtle aspects make typing on the Matcha switch comfortable and less fatiguing over extended periods. Unfortunately, information regarding the feel of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is currently unavailable.
Overall, the KTT Matcha tactile switch excels in providing a tactile typing experience with a distinct sound profile and a comfortable feel. However, without information on the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is challenging to make a direct comparison between the two. If the qualities of the Lotus switch are similar to those of the Matcha, users can expect a tactile and snappy typing experience with a unique sound profile. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, consider your typing preferences. If you value a comfortable, snappy tactility with a clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha may be the better choice for you. Moreover, if you enjoy a switch with a light actuation force and a distinctive feel such as stepped, snappy, accented, feathery, or subtle, the Matcha could enhance your typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a slightly higher bottom out force and a linear feel, the Lotus may be more suitable for you. Ultimately, choose the switch that aligns with your typing style and preferences for the best experience.
Mentioned in this article
