United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Glimp vs. Huano Matcha Latte V2

An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Glimp and Huano Matcha Latte V2 present compelling options for enthusiasts seeking a linear experience, yet each caters to distinct preferences. The Glimp switch is renowned for its medium-light actuation force, providing a comfortable typing experience that combines a satisfying tactile feedback with a fairly clacky sound profile, making it ideal for users who enjoy both auditory feedback and a substantial feel during their typing sessions. On the other hand, the Matcha Latte V2 offers a smoother, understated linear typing experience that emphasizes minimal stem wobble and a solid bottom-out sensation, ensuring a consistently premium performance with each keystroke. While the Glimp is perfect for those who appreciate a bit more auditory and tactile involvement, the Matcha Latte V2 shines for users seeking a quieter and more refined typing experience at an accessible price point. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POK

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

18mm spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the KTT Glimp and the Huano Matcha Latte V2, distinct differences emerge in their top housings, while both utilize nylon for their bottom housings. The Glimp features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer nature, which enhances the resonance of notes produced when pressing the keys. Moreover, polycarbonate's translucency also makes it particularly advantageous for RGB lighting, as the light is able to pass through efficiently, creating a visually appealing effect. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 employs a POK (polyketone) top housing that, while also designed to promote a smooth typing experience, focuses on durability and low friction characteristics. The contrasting attributes of both top housings mean they deliver different auditory experiences, one being brighter and more resonant while the other leans towards a smoother, more muted sound.

Both the KTT Glimp and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 share a commonality in their choice of nylon for the bottom housing. This material is renowned for producing a fuller sound profile, as its softer plastic composition absorbs sound more effectively than harder alternatives. When engaging with either of these switches, users will experience a deeper and more rounded sound, which complements the acoustics offered by the respective top housings. While the nylon bottom housing contributes significantly to the bottom-out sound and feel, the differences between the polycarbonate and POK top housing still establish a distinctive sound signature for each switch overall. In this case, the characteristic warmth and resonance brought about by the nylon base combine with the differing effects of the top materials to create a multifaceted auditory experience.

Ultimately, the interaction between the distinct top housing materials and the shared nylon bottom housings dictates the overall performance and sound profile of each switch. For users drawn to a brighter and more defined sound, the KTT Glimp's combination of polycarbonate top and nylon bottom may be the preferred choice. Conversely, those seeking a smoother and tight sound, with an emphasis on durability, might favor the Huano Matcha Latte V2's POK top housing paired with nylon. In light of these contrasts, both switches offer unique auditory experiences, but each can deliver satisfying results depending on the user's preferences and typing style, further illustrating how different material qualities can be effectively utilized to achieve similar overall performance markers.

Weight

When comparing the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch, the actuation forces reveal subtle differences in typing experience. The Glimp requires an actuation force of 43 grams, whereas the Matcha Latte V2 has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams. This indicates that the Glimp may be more suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions, while the Matcha Latte V2 offers a firmer push that some may find more satisfying. In terms of bottom out force, the Glimp's bottom out is rated at 53 grams, indicating that it provides a more tangible feedback when fully pressed compared to the Matcha Latte V2, which lacks a specified bottom out force. This absence suggests that the feedback may be less defined for the Matcha Latte V2. Overall, the KTT Glimp is the lighter option, catering to those who prioritize comfort for extended use, while the Huano Matcha Latte V2 offers a heavier resistance, appealing to users who prefer a stronger tactile response.

Travel distance

The KTT Glimp linear switch and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch have different travel distances, which can significantly affect the typing experience. The Glimp features a travel distance of 4.0 mm, making it the longer of the two options. This depth may appeal to those who prefer a more pronounced feel when pressing the keys, as it provides a hearty response that many users find satisfying. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm, which makes it more suitable for gamers seeking quicker response times and less resistance while typing. While both switches cater to distinct preferences, individuals who favor a more abrupt and responsive actuation might gravitate towards the Matcha Latte V2, whereas those enjoying more depth will likely prefer the KTT Glimp for its traditional longer stroke.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.

The Huano Matcha Latte V2 comes in at $3.99 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When comparing the sound profiles of the KTT Glimp and Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches, the Glimp clearly stands out due to its clacky sound, characterized as crisp and percussive. This sharp auditory feedback can create a lively typing experience, making it quite enjoyable for those who appreciate a more expressive sound while typing. On the other hand, the Matcha Latte V2's sound characteristics remain unspecified, which leaves some uncertainty in terms of its auditory impact. However, it can be inferred that the Matcha Latte V2 aims for a more neutral or subdued sound, given its emphasis on a smooth typing experience and premium performance.

In terms of feel, the KTT Glimp offers a creamy and mild typing experience, resulting in a smooth and buttery sensation during use. This aesthetic is particularly appealing as it guarantees a silky typing experience where the keys almost melt under the fingers, providing both comfort and consistency. The mild aspect of the Glimp makes it approachable for all types of users. While specific descriptions for the Matcha Latte V2's feel are not provided, the switch is noted for its smooth operation due to generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble. This suggests a solid and enjoyable typing experience that complements the smooth nature often sought after in linear switches.

In conclusion, both the KTT Glimp and Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches cater to users looking for a satisfying typing experience, albeit with different focuses. The Glimp stands out with its enjoyable sound profile alongside its creamy feel, making it an engaging choice for those who appreciate auditory feedback. Meanwhile, while the Matcha Latte V2’s sound properties are not defined, its smooth and premium linear performance suggests it would appeal to users seeking a more minimalist auditory experience combined with a solid typing feel. Ultimately, while both switches promise a pleasurable experience, the choice between them may hinge on individual preferences for sound and tactile feedback during use.

Conclusion

To wrap up, choosing between the KTT Glimp and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switches ultimately depends on your typing preferences and environment. If you're looking for a switch that offers a balanced typing experience with a medium-light actuation force, the Glimp is an excellent choice. Its clacky sound profile and creamy feel provide a satisfying auditory and tactile element, making it ideal for those who enjoy a bit of feedback while typing, whether for gaming or general use. On the other hand, if you prefer a super smooth, almost buttery typing experience with minimal noise, the Matcha Latte V2 is likely more suitable for you. With its smooth linear action and premium feel, it caters well to users who value quiet, uninterrupted typing, especially in shared or office environments. Ultimately, make your choice based on whether you prioritize a responsive typing sensation with a bit of acoustics or a seamless, muted experience.

Mentioned in this article