KTT Glimp vs. Outemu Lotus
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Glimp and Outemu Lotus offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Glimp switch stands out for its medium-light actuation force, providing a satisfying typing experience with tactile feedback and a fairly clacky sound profile. On the other hand, the Lotus switch remains a bit of a mystery with no specific standout feature mentioned. Those looking for a switch with a balance of resistance and responsiveness may lean towards the Glimp, while individuals seeking a more neutral typing experience may opt for the Lotus. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Glimp and the Outemu Lotus differ in terms of the top housing material used. The Glimp utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile due to its stiffness. In contrast, the Lotus features a nylon top housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound. While the Glimp's polycarbonate top housing may produce a clearer and resonant sound, the Lotus's nylon top housing offers a duller and rounder sound quality.
Both the Glimp and the Lotus have nylon bottom housings, which contribute to a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon. This similarity in housing materials means that the bottom-out sound and feel of both switches will be influenced by the nylon material. However, where they differ is in their top housing material. The Glimp's polycarbonate top housing creates a more resonant and crisp sound when the key is released, while the Lotus's nylon top housing produces a rounder sound profile upon key release. Overall, the combination of housing materials in both switches provides a unique typing experience based on the properties of the materials used.
In conclusion, the choice between the KTT Glimp and the Outemu Lotus ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound profile. The Glimp's polycarbonate top housing offers a sharper and more resonant sound profile, ideal for users who prefer a crisper typing experience. On the other hand, the Lotus's nylon top housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, which may be preferred by those seeking a softer and more muted typing experience. Despite their differences, both switches offer a high-quality typing experience thanks to the unique properties of their housing materials.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it becomes evident that the Glimp requires a slightly heavier touch than the Lotus. The Glimp has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it medium-light in terms of force required. In contrast, the Lotus has an actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, which is on the lighter side. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Lotus, as it requires less force for both actuation and bottom out. On the other hand, the Glimp provides a slightly more substantial typing experience with its heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Regardless of the differences, both switches offer smooth linear keypresses that are ideal for various typing and gaming tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for typing force.
Travel distance
The KTT Glimp linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Outemu Lotus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm. This means that the Lotus has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Glimp. The Glimp's 4 mm travel distance is more traditional, while the Lotus's 3.3 mm is shallower. Gamers might prefer the Lotus for its faster response time due to the shorter travel distance, while those who enjoy a more pronounced keystroke may opt for the Glimp with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The KTT Glimp linear switch is favored for its fairly clacky sound profile, providing a sharp and snappy auditory feedback during typing sessions. This sound profile adds a satisfying element to the overall typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus linear switch does not have a described sound profile, making it difficult to compare in this aspect. Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Glimp is known for offering a creamy typing experience, characterized by a smooth and buttery sensation that allows for effortless keystrokes. This tactile feedback, coupled with a comfortable actuation force, makes typing on the Glimp switch highly responsive and enjoyable. In contrast, the Lotus switch lacks a description of its feel, making it challenging to assess in this regard.
Overall, if the Glimp and Lotus switches were compared based on the available information, the Glimp switch would likely provide a more distinct and satisfying sound and feel during typing sessions. The clacky sound profile and creamy typing experience of the Glimp switch may appeal to users seeking a more tactile and responsive typing feel. However, without specific information on the sound and feel of the Lotus switch, it is uncertain how it would measure up against the Glimp. Ultimately, if you are looking for a switch with a unique sound profile and a smooth typing experience, the KTT Glimp linear switch may be the better option based on the currently available information.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prefer a medium-light switch with tactile feedback and a satisfying typing experience, along with a clacky sound profile, the Glimp switch would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter switch with a neutral sound profile and a gentle typing experience, the Lotus switch may be more suitable for your preferences. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal preference for actuation force, sound profile, and typing feel. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing style and preferences for an optimal mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
