United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Grapefruit vs. Keygeek Keygeek Raw

An in-depth look at the KTT Grapefruit and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the KTT Grapefruit linear switch to the Keygeek Raw linear switch, it becomes clear that each offers unique features that cater to different preferences. The Grapefruit is known for its soft and light feel, paired with a distinctive "baritone" sound profile. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw stands out for its blend of materials, resulting in a creamy and lightweight switch with a slightly textured feel. While the Grapefruit is categorized as low-pitched, neutral, and polished, the Keygeek Raw falls under the textured, mild, neutral, and subtle categories. Both switches have their own appeal and strengths, making them suitable for different types of users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

57.5g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon & UPE blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

UMPE & Si blend

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT Grapefruit and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches offer different characteristics that can greatly impact the overall typing experience. The Grapefruit features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw utilizes a Nylon & UPE blend top housing, which may provide a different sound quality due to the unique blend exclusive to Keygeek Raw switches. While both materials offer clarity and resonance in sound, they may produce distinct tones that cater to different preferences.

Moving on to the bottom housing, the Grapefruit showcases nylon, a classic switch housing material known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile. In comparison, the Keygeek Raw incorporates a UMPE & Si blend bottom housing, which again, is exclusive to Keygeek Raw switches. The blend of materials used in the Keygeek Raw may offer a different typing experience in terms of sound and feel compared to the Grapefruit's nylon bottom housing. Both materials have their own characteristics in sound absorption and tactile feedback, providing users with a variety of options to choose from based on their preferences.

Overall, whether it's the polycarbonate top housing of the Grapefruit or the Nylon & UPE blend top housing of the Keygeek Raw, both switches aim to offer a unique typing experience that caters to different preferences. While the materials used in the top and bottom housings may differ between the two switches, they both contribute to the overall sound and feel of the switch when typing. By understanding the properties of each housing material, users can make an informed decision based on their preferences for sound profile, tactile feedback, and overall typing experience.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Grapefruit linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, it is evident that the Grapefruit has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Keygeek Raw, which has an unknown actuation force. However, in terms of bottom out force, the Keygeek Raw is heavier at 57.5 grams, while the Grapefruit has a bottom out force of 53 grams. Both switches fall within the medium-light to medium range, providing a satisfying typing experience for users. Those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Grapefruit, while those who enjoy a bit more resistance might opt for the Keygeek Raw. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing comfort and feedback.

Travel distance

The KTT Grapefruit linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is considered a more traditional distance, while the Keygeek Raw linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. Gamers may prefer the Keygeek Raw for its faster response times due to its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may opt for the KTT Grapefruit. Both switches offer a different feel in terms of travel distance, with the Grapefruit being slightly longer than the Keygeek Raw. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference for key press depth and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.

The KTT Grapefruit comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Grapefruit linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, providing a bass-heavy and mellow tone that is versatile for various uses. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw linear switch also offers a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for beginners and advanced users alike. Both switches offer a pleasant typing sound that can be further enhanced by the choice of keyboard and keycaps.

Moving on to feel, the KTT Grapefruit switch is described as polished, providing a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw switch offers a textured feel out of the box, perfect for users who enjoy a slightly scratchy sensation while typing. The Keygeek Raw switch also falls in the mild and subtle category, offering a gentle resistance and approachable sound and feel for a variety of users.

In conclusion, both the KTT Grapefruit linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Grapefruit switch boasts a low-pitched sound and a polished feel, the Keygeek Raw switch provides a neutral sound profile and a textured feel. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preferences for sound and feel, as they both offer distinct characteristics that can enhance the typing experience. Whether you choose the Grapefruit or the Keygeek Raw, you can expect a satisfying typing experience with either switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Grapefruit linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you are looking for a smooth and refined typing experience with a medium-light bottom out force, opt for the KTT Grapefruit switch. The Grapefruit offers a low-pitched sound profile and a polished feel, making it a great choice for those who value a lighter touch and a sleek typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly textured feel and a unique material blend, as well as a slightly higher bottom out force, the Keygeek Raw switch would be the better option. The Keygeek Raw switch offers a neutral sound profile with a touch of creaminess and is a great starting point for enthusiasts who enjoy hand-lubing their switches. Ultimately, both switches have their own distinct characteristics, so choose based on your personal preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience.

Mentioned in this article