Bsun Guyu vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the Bsun Guyu and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Bsun Guyu and KTT Kang White both offer unique characteristics worth considering. The Guyu is celebrated for its exceptional auditory experience, featuring all-POM housings that enhance acoustics and a long pole stem for a bright, crisp sound upon bottoming out. With a medium weight and super-smooth keystrokes from the high-grade UPE stem, typing on the Guyu switch is effortless and resonant. In comparison, the Kang White stands out for its poppy linear switch design and dazzling typing sound, made even smoother by its self-lubricating material. While the Guyu is described as "clacky," "creamy," and "snappy," the Kang White is noted for being "low-pitched" and "neutral." Each switch offers a distinct typing experience, but diving deeper into their specific attributes will help you determine the best fit for your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
UPE
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
21mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Bsun Guyu features POM material for both its top and bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and more muted sound profile. In contrast, the KTT Kang White uses polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing. The polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and higher-pitched sound, while the nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound. This difference in housing materials gives each switch a unique sound profile, catering to different preferences based on sound preference.
In terms of aesthetics, the KTT Kang White's polycarbonate top housing allows for RGB lighting to shine through due to its translucency, adding a visual element to the switch. On the other hand, the Bsun Guyu's POM housing does not offer the same visual effect but focuses more on creating a pleasing sound profile. Both switches prioritize sound quality, with the choice of housing material playing a significant role in shaping the overall typing experience. While the Bsun Guyu and KTT Kang White may differ in their housing materials, both switches aim to provide an enjoyable typing experience tailored to different sound preferences.
When it comes to the tactile experience of typing on these switches, the choice of housing material impacts not only the sound but also the feel of the switch. The properties of polycarbonate and nylon influence how the switch responds to key presses, with the top housing affecting the sound when releasing a key and the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel. Despite the differences in housing materials between the Bsun Guyu and KTT Kang White, both switches offer a tactile typing experience that is enhanced by the unique properties of their respective housing materials.
Weight
Comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Bsun Guyu linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, we can see that they both have the same actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Bsun Guyu has a lighter bottom out force of 50 grams, while the KTT Kang White has a heavier bottom out force of 58 grams. This means that the Bsun Guyu would feel lighter and easier to type on, allowing for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White would provide a more substantial typing experience, with a stronger push feel that some users prefer for a more tactile response. Both switches offer a similar actuation force, so if that is the main consideration, users can expect similar results in terms of typing feel and responsiveness. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on whether a lighter or heavier typing experience is preferred.
Travel distance
The Bsun Guyu linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, which is shorter than the KTT Kang White linear switch's travel distance of 4 mm. The Bsun Guyu would provide a slightly quicker response time compared to the KTT Kang White due to its shorter travel distance. However, some users may find the shorter travel distance to feel too abrupt, while others prefer the faster response time. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and key feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Guyu has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Guyu for $3.70.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the BSUN Guyu linear switch offers a clacky typing experience with a sharp and snappy sound, providing a crisp, bright, and percussive tone. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White linear switch produces a low-pitched sound that is more bass-heavy and mellow, creating a neutral typing tone suitable for various uses. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Guyu showcasing depth and clarity, while the Kang White emphasizes smoothness and poppiness in its sound profile.
When it comes to feel, the BSUN Guyu linear switch is praised for its creamy, frictionless, polished, silky, and snappy typing experience. Users can expect a smooth and buttery sensation, with minimal resistance and effortless key presses, leading to a refined and sleek typing feel. On the contrary, information on the feel of the KTT Kang White linear switch is not available. Therefore, based on the descriptions provided for the Guyu, we can infer that the Kang White might offer a similarly smooth and frictionless typing experience, with a focus on fluid key travel and overall ease of use.
In conclusion, the BSUN Guyu linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch each offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Guyu provides a clacky sound profile with a creamy and polished typing experience, while the Kang White delivers a low-pitched sound and potentially a smooth and frictionless feel. Depending on personal preferences for typing feedback and tactile sensations, both switches have their own strengths that cater to different user needs. Ultimately, exploring these switches firsthand will help determine which one suits your typing style and preferences best.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the BSUN Guyu linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, consider the characteristics that best suit your preferences. If you value a unique auditory experience with a medium weight switch that offers super-smooth keystrokes and a distinctive sound signature, the Guyu may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a poppy linear switch with a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, the Kang White might be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prioritize the attributes of the Guyu or the Kang White that align with your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
